VH- vs. RA-Aus and CASA license vs. RPC, can help connect the dots?
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: singapore
Is it possible to achieve PPL on a recreational aircraft (RPC, sling)?... I suspect RPC aircraft will need to be VH registered...? As I saw some school advertise possibility of achieving CPL on a recreational aircraft....!
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Yes, as long as the aircraft is on the VH register, then you're good to go. For a CPL flight test you'll need a TAS of at least 120 kts though, which is usually beyond what recreational aircraft are capable of.
Moderator

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Yep and as long as the book says it can crack 120...who gives a damn what it will actually do.
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
To qualify for CPL flight test, you need and aircraft with a cruising speed of 120KTS and a Manually Adjustable Pitch Control (MAPC).
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
Moderator

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne
Errr... no. Not correct sorry. There are plenty that fit that criteria. The fact that they aren’t VH is a different kettle of fish and a different conversation.

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 602
From: Australia
I think you'll find there is no Archer that meets those specifications either
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
RA-Aus aircraft used to achieve RPC + Nav Endorsement.
RPC+Nav is converted to RPL+Nav and flight review to activate.
Student completes Command building in RA or VH aircraft
VH registered complex (MPPC+120kts) aircraft used for around 30 hours of dual CPL training, and final flight test.






