VH- vs. RA-Aus and CASA license vs. RPC, can help connect the dots?
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: singapore
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it possible to achieve PPL on a recreational aircraft (RPC, sling)?... I suspect RPC aircraft will need to be VH registered...? As I saw some school advertise possibility of achieving CPL on a recreational aircraft....!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, as long as the aircraft is on the VH register, then you're good to go. For a CPL flight test you'll need a TAS of at least 120 kts though, which is usually beyond what recreational aircraft are capable of.
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep and as long as the book says it can crack 120...who gives a damn what it will actually do.
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To qualify for CPL flight test, you need and aircraft with a cruising speed of 120KTS and a Manually Adjustable Pitch Control (MAPC).
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
There is NO RA aircraft that meets those specifications. Try Piper Archer III or Cessna 182RG.
Errr... no. Not correct sorry. There are plenty that fit that criteria. The fact that they aren’t VH is a different kettle of fish and a different conversation.
I think you'll find there is no Archer that meets those specifications either
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Sydney
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RA-Aus aircraft used to achieve RPC + Nav Endorsement.
RPC+Nav is converted to RPL+Nav and flight review to activate.
Student completes Command building in RA or VH aircraft
VH registered complex (MPPC+120kts) aircraft used for around 30 hours of dual CPL training, and final flight test.