Upper air flight levels
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Scotland
Age: 75
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Upper air flight levels
Hi All - as recent SLF UK-S.A. and user of Flight Radar, I have noticed that UAS traffic occasionally cruises at intermediate flight levels (e.g. FL 315).
Does Australia allow use of cruise-climb technique heading up towards India/ME, and if so, under what conditions ?
Could it be to avoid turbulence ?
Tks in advance
Does Australia allow use of cruise-climb technique heading up towards India/ME, and if so, under what conditions ?
Could it be to avoid turbulence ?
Tks in advance
Due to lots of space and little traffic Oz allows block altitudes. Where you can fly at any Altitude within the cleared block. With RVSM it's not really needed, but some like to do it.
What halas said.
Nunc est bibendum
Oz ATC directive a few years back to not permit non standard levels. So now everyone gets a block clearance so they can flys at the non standard level due furbulencd or efficiency.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The majority of Australians live on the east and southeast coastal fringe. Continuous radar coverage exists from north of Cairns, down the coast to west of Adelaide. When coverage is seen on a map, it is often called the J curve. Apart from radar cover around Perth and Darwin, the rest of the country is sparsely populated and sometimes referred to as the GAFA.
They used to allow it until there was a loss of separation around Darwin I believe. They seem fine with giving it when it suits them though, we were given non-standard FL250 today.
Non-standard levels may still be given, but ATC need to know that you are asking for the right reasons, so you have to include the phrase ‘due operational requirement’ with the request. If you say ‘for ****s and giggles’ instead, the request will probably be denied.
Nunc est bibendum
Just prefer the block level myself these days. If it’s rough it allows me to bounce around different levels without having to bug ATC every few minutes.
The stupid thing is that a non standard level if requested was always ‘operationally required’ anyway. Either for smooth air or to save fuel. Insisting on it being ‘operationally required ‘ (without defining what that was) was as smart as some of the ‘climb via SID’, ‘descend via STAR’ stuff.
The stupid thing is that a non standard level if requested was always ‘operationally required’ anyway. Either for smooth air or to save fuel. Insisting on it being ‘operationally required ‘ (without defining what that was) was as smart as some of the ‘climb via SID’, ‘descend via STAR’ stuff.
The stupid thing is that a non standard level if requested was always ‘operationally required’ anyway. Either for smooth air or to save fuel. Insisting on it being ‘operationally required ‘ (without defining what that was) was as smart as some of the ‘climb via SID’, ‘descend via STAR’ stuff.
