Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

CAGRS now established at BNK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2017, 02:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
No Clive Wilson no longer provides any service at Lord Howe Island. I will quote from the front page of The Australian newspaper, June 13, 2015.

“Then, last year, CASA would not renew what is known as his CAR 120 licence, which allowed him to provide detailed weather observations to pilots in a more proactive fashion, unless he took at $20,000 meteorological training course.”

A little later it says:

“Of aviation authorities’ efforts to smother Mr Wilson, Air Vice Marshal Evans said: “It is a great safety enhancement that isn’t part of the official safety environment so the bureaucracy tries to kill it.” An Airservices spokesman said Sir Angus was not available to comment.”
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 03:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Traffic. I introduced the Unicom as an important part of AMATS in1991.

It was to be non prescriptive. Just like the USA and Canada .

Very quickly CAA people said such a non prescriptive system could not be safe.

It's gone downhill since then. In the US unicoms give weather and traffic information with no limitations. They are fantastic.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 17:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
And it's now 26 years later, and the only one who seems to care about Unicoms is you Dick.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 20:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Yes. Even after 15 were killed at Lockhart River where the groundsman had a radio but was not allowed to advise the aircrew that it was CAVOK to the east of the airport.

One day we will get North American type Unicoms. They are totally non prescriptive and work really well. The operator can give local WX and traffic . Fantastic
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 21:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
OK..now you are drawing a pretty long bow, Dick.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 21:41
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,254
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Dick you are the Donald Trump of Australian aviation. You just say outrageous things as though its the truth. Lockhart River was always an accident that was going to happen because of poor regulator oversight, no TAWs fitted and a PIC who had previously admitted to "shooting the hole" to get below cloud. Nowhere in that report does it state that the accident would not have occurred if a Unicom operator was at Lockhart River airport.

Last edited by Lookleft; 21st Mar 2017 at 10:58.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 12:21
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond NSW
Posts: 1,345
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Why is it that some of the Australian very wealthy, expect those not to work for free?
gerry111 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 06:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Certainly not me. The groundsman was already being paid. Same as the Firies at Ballina .

By not allowing US style Unicoms it's not as if we have lots of paid people performing the service . Most of our non twr airline airports have no Cagro or Unicom.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 06:23
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Most of our non twr airline airports have no Cagro or Unicom.
Because they're not needed! You just don't get it, Dick. You need to move on from the 1950's USA mindset of friendly FBOs and follow-me girls.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 07:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Most of our non twr airline airports have no Cagro or Unicom.
Make that practically all.
But I'll bet that all those airlines have a company frequency that they use to communicate company info and maybe local conditions on. They just won't sit there all day doing it for everyone else, because it's NOT THEIR BUSINESS!
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 21:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Yair. Whatever we do make sure we don't copy the best from other countries. Those Unicoms that all US and Canadian airports have giving traffic and weather are not needed here. Our pilots are just that much better,!
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 23:25
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
UNICOMs can be approved without any training or qualification of the operators except for a radio operator certificate.

Ive run one, also flown into some very good ones but also seen some real shockers. Such as a certain SW airport where the ground operator thought he had some ATC authority and directed a GA aircraft to hold to the south to let a larger RPT or charter in.

Or another one who used to like to use the term "clear to land".

then another operator who didn't understand how to interpret a windsock and gave a pilot completely wrong information about which rwy the wind was favouring.
YPJT is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 01:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Yp. Good points. It's our Unicom operators that are incompetent compared to Unicom
Operators in the USA and Canada.

We will have to stick with the requirement that any operator who dares give WX or traffic info must have held an ATC or FS licence and gets paid I mint to provide the service .

Aussies are clearly inferior.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 12:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you mean superior Dick? Because what I've always known is what an Australian doesn't know about aviation, isn't worth knowing. Clearly world leaders in everything aviation
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 12:46
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting Dick how you tell blatant mistruths to the uninformed to try and push your point. The FAA regs clearly forbid your fantastic USA Unicoms from giving traffic information. They are allowed to do basically what a Unicom in Australia can do and no more.


I still remember very clearly when you spoke in the Hilton ballroom and talked about "Affordable Safety" and "Full cost recovery" and how the industry would have to pay.


Now you make out like it is someone else's doing and responsibility. Dick, you directly started the ball rolling on the demise of GA and services to the aviation industry. Step up be a man and take it on the chin instead of the crap you pedal on these forums.
renegade154 is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 22:37
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
It is worth noting the US is toying with the idea of privatising their ATC services. Interesting times ahead! I am not familiar with the level of charging for RPT service (or, even if there is any...or, how it is levied now) but will be very interested in this outcome.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 22:38
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
By the way...Renegade
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 22:46
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,318
Received 135 Likes on 98 Posts
And Dick, at the BBQ who held for Sydney ATC one of the wife's of a controller asked you some pointed questions about affordable safety which you struggled to answer. Afterwards you came up to her to ask "why did you give me such a hard time".
sunnySA is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 22:51
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Interesting Dick how you tell blatant mistruths to the uninformed to try and push your point. The FAA regs clearly forbid your fantastic USA Unicoms from giving traffic information.
Dick! Is this true?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 23:17
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Renegade154, I can see why you post anonymously. You simply don’t have the guts to put your real name behind what you are actually saying.

I can assure everyone that the myth propagated for over 20 years that you can’t give traffic information in the USA is just that – a myth.

Have a look at the US Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) under ‘UNICOM Communications Procedures’:

“Phraseology – Frederick UNICOM Cessna eight zero one Tango Foxtrot (location on airport) taxiing to runway one niner, request wind and traffic information Frederick.
While the FAA procedures are non-prescriptive, traffic information can be given – and is given all the time.

I find it amazing that people can keep anonymously posting disinformation to stop us from copying the best in the world.
Dick Smith is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.