Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

CPL Flight Test under Part 61 - CSU Requirements

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

CPL Flight Test under Part 61 - CSU Requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 05:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CPL Flight Test under Part 61 - CSU Requirements

Under the Pre part 61, you needed to do a CPL Flight Test in an aeroplane capable of 120 kts with a traditional CSU.

I've been looking at Part 61 and the MOS for the new requirements. Is the CSU & 120 KTAS requirements still in effect...I just can't find it.

Just brainstorming for an academy type fleet(overseas cadets). Diesel is the way of the future. Piper Archer DX for every thing up to CPL test and Diamond DA 62 for IFR. Could CASA issue a dispensation for this Archer DX for CPL.
Guptar is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 08:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guptar the CSU, 120kt requirement is still there, (I'm heading out for a beer, reference later). Cirrus qualifies even though there's no pitch control, (straight from an FOI)
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 12:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AUS
Posts: 42
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by The name is Porter
Guptar the CSU, 120kt requirement is still there, (I'm heading out for a beer, reference later). Cirrus qualifies even though there's no pitch control, (straight from an FOI)
At the place I last worked a candidate had a CPL test form sent back by CASA as he didn't have MPPC.
This was just before P61.

(This test was done in an SR20)

Last edited by AmarokGTI; 3rd Sep 2016 at 00:19.
AmarokGTI is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 00:22
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok I found it

Appendix I.1 CPL Aeroplane category rating flight test

1. Flight test requirements

1.1 An applicant for a commercial pilot licence with aeroplane category rating flight test must demonstrate her or his competency, in the units of competency mentioned in clause 3, by performing manoeuvres in an aeroplane, within the flight tolerances specified in table 2 in Section 1 of Schedule 8 of this MOS.

1.2 For subclause 1.1, a sustained deviation outside the applicable flight tolerance is not permitted.

1.3 For Schedule 2 elements A2.3 and A4.2, if sufficient cross-wind conditions do not exist at the time of the flight test then, providing the examiner is satisfied the applicant’s achievement records indicate that competency has been achieved during training, the element may be excluded from the flight test.

1.4 The aircraft used for a flight test for the aeroplane category rating must have the following characteristics:

(a) cruise true airspeed of not less than 120 kts;

(b) a powerplant with one of the following:

(i) turbine engine with propeller; or

(ii) piston engine with variable pitch propeller.


Now questions that this poses.

They have no reference to MMMC so does this automatically mean a next gen aircraft with a single power lever is acceptalble.

The 120 TAS speed requirement. Casa don't specify a power setting or altitude. If an aircraft can make the 120 KTS TSAS only at 75% power and optimum altitude does it qualify.

I have to say some Arrows I have flown in the past would struggle to make 120 KTAS except in a dive.
Guptar is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 01:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 556
Received 79 Likes on 38 Posts
We have had several people pass their CPL flight tests in a Cirrus SR22 so MPPC was clearly not a requirement. This was pre pt 61. As with all things CASA, probably open to individual interpretation. Always ask for a specific reference when CASA knock something back.
Cloudee is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 04:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The 120kt TAS used to be on aircraft POH performance figures, not achieved figures. I doubt that changed for the new rules. Mind you, I think it was a step backwards from the previous CSU/retractable/180 HP requirement.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 09:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Redfern
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Retract wasn't previously required.
olm8tyrone is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 22:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes, it was. Go back some years earlier, to before the 120kt requirement was introduced. That's the period to which I referred. Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 23:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They have no reference to MMMC so does this automatically mean a next gen aircraft with a single power lever is acceptalble.
I have got it confirmed by an FOI that Cirrus is acceptable for the CPL test.
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2016, 09:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 379
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
I have got it confirmed by an FOI that Cirrus is acceptable for the CPL test.
Presumably someone would still need an MPPC endorsement to get into something like a 182 after passing their CPL having only flown a Cirrus?
mikewil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.