Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Metro versus Cessna C150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 05:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
One of the issues that I have found is that VFR & IFR pilots speak different languages and have different maps. VFR pilots tend to reference their position compared with ground features. IFR pilots tend to use distance & bearing from airports, aids or intersections. Intersection names used to frequently give clues to where they are, but post the ground based aid shutdown they are meaningless. A VFR pilot might understand 10nm from Cowes, but is unlikely to have any idea what 10nm from Sunti means. Conversely, an IFR flight may not even have a WAC chart on board and may not really understand something like abeam Egg Lagoon (a real place on track on King Is).
Isn't this a training issue?

When doing an approach during an IR renewal, if I give a position report in "IFR speak" I would expect to get chatted by my ATO for not using language that should make sense to a VFR pilot in the circuit area or environs.

Dr

Last edited by ForkTailedDrKiller; 3rd Aug 2016 at 08:23.
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 06:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Abeam Alice Springs
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't this a training issue?
IT CERTAINLY IS!

Trouble is those that conduct the training are not across the subject. You only have to look at the differences of what is taught between flying schools and even RPT operators and how in practice they interact in the system.

Some years ago it was proposed by one segment of industry that all reports on CTAFs etc relating to inbound and outbound calls should use compass quadrants rather that bearings or radials so as to keep it simple. CASA did not understand and did not take up the recommendation. Same seems still to apply. Not the same since the days when the FOI's actually went flying!

CASA fail to understand these procedures and many operators have developed their own to cater for the situations that they encounter every day. Trouble is those procedures are not all the same and others think because the RPT do or say something it is correct and copy. If they understood the system they would know.

On the other side of the coin, many pilots talk far too much, which in itself shows a degree of ignorance of how it is all meant to work. Another failure of the training schools/departments.
triadic is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 07:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, am I the only one who thinks that a guy who regularly flies a C150 from Barwon Heads to King Island is a bit of a legend? He's a bolder man than me!


No, its not just you, I definitely wouldn't do it..!!


While we're on the topic of the guy and his C150 perhaps CASA need to look into his W&B and fuel planning. He is always two up and that thing has an O-320.


What are you getting at here tyrone..? Do you know the people involved..? A C150 can easily make it that far without being overloaded. Even with a headwind its only going to take him about 1.5hrs + 45min reserve = 135mins. If he has long range tanks, tabs fuel will give him around 200-220mins (from memory) and provided he and his passenger aren't chubsters, they won't be overloaded. If they are a bit on the 'solid' side, they can take less fuel and still make it comfortably.

Last edited by IFEZ; 3rd Aug 2016 at 07:53. Reason: Adjusted line spacing
IFEZ is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 11:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,300
Received 425 Likes on 212 Posts
Let's pile on to the C150 pilot.

I'd be scared to do what he's been doing, therefore it follows that it's dangerous and illegal. If it's not illegal, CASA should make some rules to make it illegal, because it scares me.
Lead Balloon is online now  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 19:21
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree lead balloon, lets pile more and more rules and regulations into the nanny state. Let's take more and more personal responsibility from the individual. The less you have to think for yourself the happier you'll be.

Remember: donot scratch your arse until you have written approval and have paid the appropriate fee.
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 21:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
I have experienced what Old Akro observes. As a lowly PPL transiting Avalon, Centre asks something like "XYZ your position?" I answer: "Over the salt works, tracking for Point Henry". Response: "range and bearing from Avalon please, our screens don't have topography".
Sunfish is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 23:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,883
Received 194 Likes on 101 Posts
BTW, am I the only one who thinks that a guy who regularly flies a C150 from Barwon Heads to King Island is a bit of a legend? He's a bolder man than me!
It's not that bad really, it's only 50 miles or so from Cape Otway if I'm not mistaken. Take the old girl up to 10,000ft and you've only got about half an hour of s*hitting bricks @ 90 knots :-)
Squawk7700 is online now  
Old 4th Aug 2016, 00:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
I have experienced what Old Akro observes. As a lowly PPL transiting Avalon, Centre asks something like "XYZ your position?" I answer: "Over the salt works, tracking for Point Henry". Response: "range and bearing from Avalon please, our screens don't have topography".
That is why both groups of pilots should use eg: "10 miles South East Avalon heading West at 3000' " for instance.
The only landmarks ATC, or IFR pilots are likely to know are those marked as entry/exit points on a VTC (or whatever acronym maps we have now)
Tankengine is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2016, 17:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sunfish, your reply should be as follows:

'I'm over the salt works tracking for Point Henry'

The radar doesn't have topography but their VTC's do.
The name is Porter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.