Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

C208/C172 flight review question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Apr 2016, 01:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C208/C172 flight review question

Just a quick one about single engine flight reviews.

Will doing a review in a C172 cover me for a C208? I am getting a wide variety of answers ranging from being told I have to do a full review in a 208 to I don't have to do anything extra after the 172 flight. The inability of anyone to give me a definite answer I find a little concerning.

Can anyone without a financial interest help me out?

Cheers
pilotchute is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2016, 04:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Form 61-9FR lists only single engine class and multi engine class. As both the C208 and C172 are in the single engine class I would say doing it in a 172 would cover it. There is no turbine box
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2016, 09:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: melbourne australia
Posts: 96
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Para 24 of “Prescription of aircraft and ratings — CASR Part 61 (Edition 1)” dated 23 December 2014 reads “Aircraft types for which flight training and flight review are required for exercise of privileges of a class rating — single-engine aeroplanes For regulation 61.062 of CASR 1998, each single-engine aeroplane model mentioned in a cell of column 2 of the table in Schedule 12, is a model for which flight training and a flight review are required under regulation 61.747 of CASR 1998 to exercise the privileges of the single-engine aeroplane class rating in the model”.
The Cessna 208 is listed in Schedule 12, so I suggest you draw your own conclusions!
blackburn is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2016, 09:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 556
Received 79 Likes on 38 Posts
The only time you have to do a flight review in a C208 is after your initial training in that aircraft. From then on, any single engine flight review will cover the C208.
Cloudee is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 03:49
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks Bob and Cloudee. After looking at the form Bob referenced it was pretty clear that no seperate flight was required for the GTE endorsement.

Cheers
pilotchute is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 10:05
  #6 (permalink)  
QFF
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: , Location, Location
Posts: 154
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pilotchute - CASR 61.062 and 61.747 has already been quoted by blackburn (above). 61.745 further clarifies that you need a flight review every 24 mths (or so).

Putting it all together, because the C208 is mentioned in Schedule 12, presuming you have already have done the necessary training, you will still need to do a flight review in the C208 every 24mths, which will cover you for the C172 but not vice versa.
QFF is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 10:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dog House
Age: 49
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would help if you guys put links with your comments, to search any thing on a CASA Web Page is imposble to do as they run 3 or more at a time.

A simple google "casa schedule 12" and I should find a list(in any normal country) but it seems a secret even with new CASA Website.
Band a Lot is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 11:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Pilotchute, it looks like you may have to peruse Part 61, sorry if I gave you a bum steer. At this stage of my career, picking up Part 61 and flipping between regs that reference other regs holds zero interest to me. What QFF has written could well be correct, but then again what Cloudee has written may be correct too. I am not type rated on a 208 and I just dunno.

Such is life under Part 61. What I do know under this new ****forregs is that after renewing my instructors rating in a single engine aircraft I lost the ability to do multi engine training until I do a multi AFR and I cannot fly at night until I do a night AFR, so it now looks like I am expected to do three flight reviews where, once upon a time I only needed to do one (renew instructor rating). I guess I could have renewed my instructors rating in a multi at night but finding an ATO willing could have proved difficult.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 12:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: in the air
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the plain english interpretation by casa of the regulations are here:

https://www.casa.gov.au/regulations-...3Apc=PC_101937

Such is life under Part 61. What I do know under this new ****forregs is that after renewing my instructors rating in a single engine aircraft I lost the ability to do multi engine training until I do a multi AFR and I cannot fly at night until I do a night AFR
Ironically you can still do an instructor proficiency check (SEA), and instrument proficiency check (MEA) all during the day, and be ticked off to fly at night... (insofar as proficiency checks are concerned)

Last edited by vh-foobar; 1st May 2016 at 17:45. Reason: grammar
vh-foobar is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 14:55
  #10 (permalink)  
QFF
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: , Location, Location
Posts: 154
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by vh-foobar
the plain english interpretation by casa of the regulations are here:

https://www.casa.gov.au/regulations-...3Apc=PC_101937
Interesting reading. From the document referenced above:

Do I have to do training AND a flight review to fly certain types of aircraft?

Yes. Before flying these types of aircraft, you must complete initial training and a flight review on that type. Once you have completed the training and flight review, the aircraft type is covered by the flight review requirements for the class rating.

Which sounds like you only have to do the first flight review on your C208, then subsequent AFR's in the C172 would cover you for the C208 as well. I stand corrected...
QFF is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 19:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
I just read your link QFF and I think you are correct. A type rating must include a flight review on the type. After that a class rating will cover it. Very plain and simple. It could well prove impossible to keep type ratings without this provision.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 20:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: in the air
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its made even clearer here:

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...ugLmYw&cad=rja
vh-foobar is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 20:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
So, after 12 posts it looks like your good to go in a 172 Pilotchute. Thanks Foobar and QFF for enlightening an instructor. It seems Cloudee nailed it back at #4
Aussie Bob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.