Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Suitable 'Replacement' for a C-172RG...?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Suitable 'Replacement' for a C-172RG...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2016, 05:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Queensland
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although a little pricey the Socata Trinidad is a great little plane. Also still a few Rockwell 112/4s floating around which may fit the bill
Nick 123 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 07:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pricey yes but heck, what other options are there…..172/182….210?

Rather a nice Bo or a retard vehicle, but they don't fit the bill.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 07:57
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
Hi Jab,

I think the decision may well be to repaint so it looks 'smicko', and as time permits, upgrade the Txpdr to Mode S, and maybe later, a little little bit of glass
maybe.
I still prefer the 6-pack (Old Habits die hard...) and most charter acft that the wannabees will fly will be similar I reckon.

Donk is good, and SIDS all done.

Interesting exercise though....sometimes as has been said,
'The only replacement for a DC-3 is........

Similarly the ole 'Cutlass'...for now.

Cheers
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 13:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aggregating some marginal gains.
Age: 45
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Griffo, I have scratched my head something chronic over the last few days, trying to think of a viable alternative to your RG. Honestly, I think you are bang on the money when you say another one will be the best replacement. Everything else I can find will either be too complex for CPL students, to costly to run, purchase or maintain, or is simply not suited to the role or has added and less obvious considerations. A recently refurbished 172 RG realy is the best candidate. A rather sad indictment of the progress in GA aircraft manufacturing over the last 30 years.
2EggOmelette is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 15:09
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
Thanks for the head scratching Mate.

A 'panel' of us couldn't come up with anything we could afford and which would do the job either.

And for the CPL wannabees, the job they go to initially, will, no doubt, be of the same vintage - and will have a 6-pack!
So, they might as well get used to it.

As much as the new 'computer whiz kids' get excited over lots of 'glass',
in the real world of 210's and the like, it ain't gunna happen....generally speaking.

Still, I'll continue to 'scratch away', you never know.....??

Cheers
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 01:25
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How about the Pipistrel Panthera. Only thing you can't do is shade yourself under the wing, but you will still look cool!
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 10:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond NSW
Posts: 1,345
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Ah yes.. The great C172RG gutless Cutless! Lots of fun trips that I've had in those over the years!


One that I particularly remember was flying in FCV during 1998 from overhead Eucla to YFRT. Best groundspeed available that day was 85Kts at 500'..
gerry111 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 22:23
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 606
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
I love the Rockwell commander 114. Built like the proverbial brick outhouse, particularly now the wing problems are sorted.

IO540 engine, big cabin, plenty of weight lifting capability, a really nice aeroplane with a really great pedigree.

There are some in the US which have been tarted up with flash new panels etc and they look really nice.
Snakecharma is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 02:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
So what is wrong with a Mooney? I see Fred Gassit made the suggestion but no one has commented. Are they just a private toy or good for the odd charter too? I see the newies have two doors but most have one door which could be a hassle. The price on second hand ones does look attractive.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 04:06
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what is wrong with a Mooney?
Nothing really except they are a bit labour intensive to open up for maintenance and I'm not sure how well they would handle stalling in from from 10 ft with their rubber donuts for springs. The Cessnas seem to manage OK. Don't ask me how I know.
rutan around is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 08:07
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
Hi Bob,

A certain 'local' mob having a lot of trouble with their Mooneys, costing lots of money, corrosion in wing spars, not good.....still, they must have paid for themselves by now....

Cheers
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 12:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
General Avia F22.


sure, it cant lift 4 big blokes, but for a CPL aerobatic trainer...

i know, not a serious replacement for a 172Rg, but just as a trainer.
Ultralights is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.