Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Texas Skyways C182 310hp STC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2015, 13:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Texas Skyways C182 310hp STC

A chap I know who is a farmer type and C182 owner recently asked me about the STC by Texas Skyways for installation of a Continental IO-550N with 310hp. According to the video you also get a new engine mount in the package.

Has anyone had any experience with higher hp STC's on the 182, especially as its about 50 lbs heavier. I have heard they put a 4 lb weight in the tail cone which helps with the C of G.

Since I don't know any more than what the website & video tell me, I thought I'd try here.

Is a G1000 S model harder to apply STC's?
Guptar is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2015, 15:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gupta,
Your friend should do a bit more research, there is more than one STC to put a IO-550 in a C-182.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2015, 20:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great work flower pot man.
the guy ask for help and you give one of your smuk answers.
yr right is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2015, 21:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No engine upgrade STC's for any G1000 Cessnas of any model as Garmin / Cessna have them locked up by licence preventing software upgrade for the engine display.
edsbar is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2015, 22:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
C-182 RG Air Plains 300 HP SN#R18201314-R18202041

Air Plains IO-540 conversion.

Hauls arse. Just watch CofG issues with any conversion that hangs extra metal off the front.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2015, 04:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How about an IO-568 with AX50 cylinders

Could probably wind up lighter an an existing engine.
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2015, 09:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great work flower pot man.
the guy ask for help and you give one of your smuk answers.
yr' wrong,
A little bit of self help never did anybody any harm, after all, it is the Internet Age, but maybe you haven't caught up with that just yet??

A great advantage of a bit of "do-it-yourself" research is that you will finish up mostly with facts, as opposed to the strange, wild, wacky and just plain weird ideas peddled by persons such as yourgoodself.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2015, 10:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An article from Avweb regarding 5 engine conversions.

http://www.avweb.com/news/maint/181623-1.html
captjns is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2015, 10:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think for a C182, the best upgrade is the 260HP IO540 STC.

The parallel valve 540 is probably the most reliable of the entire fleet, you get enough extra HP to transform the aircraft and I guess (too lazy to look) less weight than the 550.

There is one in Sydney and its been an outstanding success.

I know I always say too much HP is almost enough, but really the 260 is probably the better balance of HP for the airframe.

Happy to be proven wrong though if someone has some real world data.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2015, 19:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-182 RG Air Plains 300 HP SN#R18201314-R18202041

Air Plains IO-540 conversion.

Hauls arse. Just watch CofG issues with any conversion that hangs extra metal off the front.
The RG's have O-540's anyway so fitting a higher horsepower one shouldn't be all that difficult as opposed to swapping out a Continental on a fixed gear 182.
27/09 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2015, 21:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Not all 540s are the same.

The OP didn't specify an RG. The RG I fly with this conversion definitely needs the CofG to be watched. There is definitely more metal further out front. Start with the heavier prop, the cowls are extended out further.
Chieftains and P-Navajos both have 540's but they are definitely not the same engine.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2015, 11:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: where ever they tell me
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do it properly with a IO 580. 340 hp!

Modifications for the Cessna 182
OCTA is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2015, 01:23
  #13 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,445
Received 230 Likes on 122 Posts
At US$181,010 plus freight for the C182 conversion OCTA, one would need to be real keen!!
tail wheel is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2015, 02:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: where ever they tell me
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

He said its for a Farmer... they have lots of money!!
OCTA is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2015, 05:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could buy two Comanches with two IO540s for that.
Virtually There is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2015, 00:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearedtoreenter:True enough.... But they'd be write offs it if they were anywhere near TBO.
Why do you say that?
27/09 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2015, 00:31
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gods Country
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew a skydive C182 with the Texas conversion. Awesome for climbing fast. 2 tandems to FL140 faster than any other C182, over 1000fpm thru to about 8000'
BUT the extra HP does nothing for it's long range cruise, high fuel flows for not much faster. IMHO.
Could get the VSI off the gauge climbing at 80kts with only or 2 POB
Lancair70 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.