Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Does low capacity RPT AOC still exist under the new regs?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Does low capacity RPT AOC still exist under the new regs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2015, 11:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does low capacity RPT AOC still exist under the new regs?

i ask as the command requirements for such companies required you to have 500 multi command to be upgraded to Capt. Is this still the case?
pilotchute is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2015, 20:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,467
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Check the CASA website under the reg reform section. The split between RPT and charter will be removed and rebranded Air Transport, regardless if the operator uses an A380 or a Cessna 172. Part 121 will be for the heavy aircraft and 135 for the light aircraft.

The hours requirements have/are being replaced with competency based requirements which in my opinion gives the operator and crews more flexibility, in terms of grading pilots with the onus left on the operator. Thereby if a pilot displays a high level of competancy they can be released from training earlier, opposed to having to wait for their hours to hit a magic figure that means nothing. Part 61 and the respective new regs will cover these requirements.
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2015, 01:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
CAO 82.3 & 82.5

The CAOs still dictate the rules for RPT AOCs until the new CASRs come in. I hope/suspect that the new brooms in CASA will cause a delay in the introduction of 91, 121 and 135 because the Part 42/145 rule set as it stands is going to wipe out small GA charter.

We live in interesting times, comrades.
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2015, 05:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks,
Believe me, Horatio is spot on about what Part 42/145 maintenance will do to Part 135, unless there are major changes ie: A Part 43 much like FAR Part 43, plus consequential changes.
Mind you, Part 135 aerodrome standards are going to wipe out most of what we now call "charter" in light singles and twins, so maybe the Part 42/145 will not matter all that much.
Tootle pip!!

Last edited by LeadSled; 18th Jul 2015 at 05:45.
LeadSled is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.