Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

VH-AFZ Accident Warnervale NSW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2015, 12:50
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you do the following you'll never go wrong:

RELAX backpressure (no need to stand it on the nose)

SMOOTHLY increase power (increases forward airspeed, reduces AOA)

slight wingdrop you can pretty much ignore

Moderate or greater wing drop, apply a firm amount of opposite rudder as you do the above two steps, but only to counteract yaw.

The rudder needs to be only applied until Stall disappears - a matter of seconds.

If the wing starts to come up, you have really gone too far, as it could cause it to spin the other way with the forced increase of AOA you have caused on the other wing.
Once the stall is over with (as I said in a matter of only seconds), you can very safely use aileron to level the wings.

In reality, on most wings with washout incorporated into the design, aileron can almost always be used throughout unless it is the most savage and deliberate stall entry with high power and a lot of flap out for example.

Still probably safer to recommend leaving the ailerons alone until unstalled though in my opinion.

I am happy for others to correct me on this, but have been teaching it for many years on many types with success.
Sir Instructalot is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2015, 00:19
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Is this conversation based on practising stalls at altitude for fun or teaching people how to recover from a stall safely in the most dangerous and possibly most likely time, after take=-off or in the approach landing phase?

Stalls aren't taught to be "fun" are they? While that be a secondary result its not the reason.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2015, 11:53
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TinselTown
Age: 45
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the engine handling issue being discussed applicable to opposed engines only?
How the cylinders are arranged around the crankcase has no bearing on mixture management. If it sucks squeezes Sparks and blows it's all the same.

I fly two different aircraft (vintage/military trainer) that have a flange on the throttle that richens the adjacent mixture lever when the throttle is moved back (in these aircraft, mixture lever back equals 'rich'). Obviously the designers wanted a richer mixture for descent.
The flange/gate on the cj6/dhc1 etc is a weird and silly concept - dont assume because it is there the engine is somehow different. It is there for dumb dumb Air Force cadets and in the cj is actually translated as the 'altitude' control lever. The little symbols are 500m, 1000m etc. the gate strikes me as an engineering solution to a non-existent problem. Or really bad pilot training...

Last edited by Lumps; 18th Jun 2015 at 11:54. Reason: chippie
Lumps is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2015, 21:25
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lumps, very well said (and correct)
Jabawocky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.