Magneto calendar overhauls - the thin end of the wedge?

[LeadSled]

A simple question about magneto overhauls segues to CASA are Cnts, way to go leadsled et al

Eddie,
Are you really suggesting that CASA and it predecessors are NOT the major reason for the state of the regulations.

Whatever you're smoking, it must be No.1 Good Sh1t.

I would say it's actually going the other way,

Would Part 61 (all 2200 pages and growing) be an example of "going the other way" ??
Or Part 173
Or Part 139
and so it goes on.

Tootle pip!!

PS: "Piper regards ----" but if they incorporate the SBs in the airframe manufacturer's MM, then it is required, just like Cessna SIDs. There are very good regulatory reasons why SB/SL (particularly when they are from component OEMs) are not automatically mandatory,( have not been incorporated in the airframe MMM) despite what the OEM might say, or what the airframe manufacturer might say, and Australian aviation regulation has never addressed this issue.

Hence, lots of heat, but not much light in this whole thread.

And still no takes as to why the C of A of your pride and joy may be invalid, or why you, as a LAME, might have signed a MR for an aircraft that does not have a valid C. of A.

[Perspective]

It least it's a nice day!
We better form a committee!
Are you suggesting there was a time SIDS wasn't mandatory?
It was only an AWB which "clarified" it after all.
Think I need a lay down....