The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Windfarms 3

Old 20th May 2015, 01:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Close
Posts: 233
Windfarms 3

I see that the current Select Committee on Wind Turbines sat again yesterday in Canberra. I also see that this matter would appear to be far from over with some 471 submissions provided thus far for the committee's consideration.

From reading some of these submissions it is quite clear that the issue of wind turbines and the varying positive and negative benefits or detractors relating to same are being taken quite seriously. From an aviation perspective in particular submission 30 provides some insight into the issues surrounding the Crookwell aerodrome (NSW). The author of this submission, (who is well known and highly respected within the industry) has certainly put the committee on notice as set out in the following quote from the closing page of his submission...

It is my firm belief that it is not a matter of “if”, it’s a matter of “when” there will be a fatal accident involving the collision of an aircraft or helicopter operating from a rural airport.


I read somewhere in another post that someone alluded to the fact that there are no "old or bold" pilots. I'm not so sure about that as quite clearly such pilots have alot to offer.....

No doubt there'll be more to come regarding this topic as the hearing continues.....

Stiky

Last edited by Stikybeke; 20th May 2015 at 02:26.
Stikybeke is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 03:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,933
At 432 metres elevation I'm surprised that nobody has ever run into the Omega tower in Gippsland, Victoria, based on the comments in the article above.

It had been there for 32 years and has just been demolished. It was harder to see than a wind farm turbine is exponentially, plus it had guide wires that gave it a significantly large footprint, as much as several wind turbines and it was even adjacent an RAAF low flying area.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 03:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 50
Posts: 6,879
I would imagine there is some other motives, it can't be just the hazard.

I am not defending wind farms either….I think they are an eyesore and not a particularly good energy solution.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 04:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
As a pilot who works below 500ft everyday, i think that the wind turbines themselves arent a huge hazard. Its the monitoring towers placed on or in the general area (or just at random wherever they thought was a good site) that pose the greatest risk to safe aviation. These things are basically unmarked (except the smallest of marker balls that you have to be within 100m of to see) and unlit. On any given day the are almost invisible to the human eye, even when you know they are there......somewhere!!!!

Whether they are a safe, environmentally friendly way to produce power, well......................depends on which 'expert' you believe.
robm is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 08:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,866
If anyone hits a wind turbine, the first post accident action is that they should have their licence taken off them!
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 10:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,522
Oh god. Who cares?
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 11:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SYD
Posts: 89
Alright, which one of you gave Don Quixote a licence?
MTBUR is offline  
Old 20th May 2015, 20:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,866
Alright, which one of you gave Don Quixote a licence?
................
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 21st May 2015, 00:16
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,002
Originally Posted by Jabawocky View Post
I would imagine there is some other motives, it can't be just the hazard.

I am not defending wind farms either….I think they are an eyesore and not a particularly good energy solution.


From a house and hangar a community that had preistage views to a community that is devided by those that have and those that don't. To now poeple that won't them of their land. Poeple that are now sick can't sleep can't work on their own property's can't sell their places can't live in their places have their places devalued by half .

Yep vested interest.

One word.
Moron
yr right is offline  
Old 21st May 2015, 01:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,002
Crookwell wind turbine facts.

Each turbine is 450 feet agl. Dia of the blades is 100 meters.

100 meters is a foot ball field.

Now work out at a 12 knot wind speed tip speed.

Look at take off speed of say a 747. Wing length.
Tip vortices

8 deaths in the USA from a direct hit from a blade/ tower
18 accidents from guild wire hits.

Now these don't produce power more than 30% of the time.




These turbines are constant vortices.
yr right is offline  
Old 21st May 2015, 01:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,002
Definition of vested interest.

Get on a forum let's say aviation.
Convince everyone they need a product.
Let's say Mmm run lop.
Oh I run a course on lop.
Charge people to go to the course.
Provide no data lead with miss truths about engine o/h time etc.
not have the course recognized because it's not approved.
Not approved because the data not approved.
Next time shite comes out of your mouth get your facts first. The gentleman you refer too have more credibility in his little toe than you will ever have.
But because you live in Sydney Melbroune or Brisbane f anyone that lives in the bush. F them as they have no rights. Well f u.
You think I'm up set well yes. Do I have a right. F yes I do.
When you have done what he has done or just part off it then feel free to make comment.
As for vested interest he didn't wish to see anyone hurt.
yr right is offline  
Old 21st May 2015, 03:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 582
You imbecile
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 21st May 2015, 04:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 72
Spelling mistakes and punctuation errors. Malapropisms. Yay, Yr right is back!

Surely if you wanted people to agree with a point of view you would want to make it easy for them to comprehend this with a reasonable standard of English rather than this barely decipherable rubbish.

I teach English and I still can't work out from the context what you mean by the misspelt word, "devided." Do you mean "divided" or "derided?"

How about some sympathy for the readers of your posts, Yr Right?
Possum1 is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.