Do Airservices Have Weather Paints on Their Radars?
Thread Starter
Do Airservices Have Weather Paints on Their Radars?
In the March 2015 edition of Flying magazine in an article entitled, “Aftermath” about a serious accident with a PC12 the article states,
Obviously in the USA the air traffic controllers have paints of the precipitation. Does that happen in Australia? Normally it’s up to the pilot to request the fly-around precipitation and I know a number of years ago when I checked the areas of precipitation were not shown on the radar controllers’ screens. What is the present position?
“At 12.32 the Pilatus was approaching FL 260 when the centre controller advised the pilot of a large area of precipitation, some of it extreme, ahead of him”.
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ATC's have an auxiliary display with the BOM weather radars. It's looped so it's not a real time display. ATC's can give advisory advice only, they are not allowed to give vectors to avoid weather based on the BOM display. The BOM weather radar is not overlaid on the controllers main display.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I visited ATC at YMML a few years ago and was surprised to see a PC displaying the BOM weather radar next to the radar terminals.
If you carry a smart phone while flying you have the same weather information available as ATC/
If you carry a smart phone while flying you have the same weather information available as ATC/
And one thing to remember with those radars, is it is precip falling near ground level, so it may be pissing down on the ground but at 25000ft you may be above the worst of it, so take any advice from ATC into context with the overall picture and use your best judgement.
You crack me up PeterC. How did your phone last pick up signal when you were IFR above several thousand when in the middle of nowhere?
I can attest to the advantage of ATC having wx radar as they do in the US. I have been accurately vectored around cells, even in close proximity, by ATC in the US. It was obvious that the ATC'er vectoring me had a very good picture as he threaded the needle (me) through a cluster of cells - saves time on the radio too - instead of me asking for a heading or left/right of track. Awesome.
We should get that here!
We should get that here!
Last edited by josephfeatherweight; 8th Apr 2015 at 06:12.
Not sure, to be honest. They could see where the nasty weather was, with a high degree of accuracy.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Squawk7700,
Don't let PeterC's comments crack you up too much champ. He's probably accurate.
Back in 2008-2009 I was able to get the bom wx radar feed on my phone whilst flying at 10,000ft between Alice Springs and Tennant Creek on the Telstra network........it was damn slow but still worked.
I hope this doesn't crack you up....
Eternity.
Don't let PeterC's comments crack you up too much champ. He's probably accurate.
Back in 2008-2009 I was able to get the bom wx radar feed on my phone whilst flying at 10,000ft between Alice Springs and Tennant Creek on the Telstra network........it was damn slow but still worked.
I hope this doesn't crack you up....
Eternity.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You crack me up PeterC. How did your phone last pick up signal when you were IFR above several thousand when in the middle of nowhere?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I did several hours at FL150 the other day and the Telstra reception was patchy to say the least.
You can't rely on it but when you can get it it is pretty good with the overlay on Avplan.
You can't rely on it but when you can get it it is pretty good with the overlay on Avplan.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
So does AsA have radar that's not as effective as US radar?
Being an electronics man you'd know how Primary and Secondary radar works. The BoM weather radars are Primary, they pick up the reflected return from the source (in their case, water droplets). ASA use the BoM radars, but because they perform multiple 3 degree sweeps to form a full picture the picture when complete could be up to 15 minutes old.
To answer your question, ASA DO NOT have weather radars. They have ATC PSR and MSSR. I have no idea what they use in the USA, but given that their radar coverage and budget is far greater than ours it could well be that they have their own dedicated real time WX radars.
Don't expect an Aus ATC to vector you around WX from the 'weather radar', you are just as likely to be vectored into a cell as away from it given the age of the picture.
Unless you want to install a transponder in CB's...
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 45
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And one thing to remember with those radars, is it is precip falling near ground level, so it may be pissing down on the ground but at 25000ft you may be above the worst of it, so take any advice from ATC into context with the overall picture and use your best judgement.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 45
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weather radars and ATC radars operate at different wavelengths because they're detecting objects at different sizes raindrop size compared to aircraft size). Not sure what they do in America but I'm guessing some kind of overlay on their ATC screens
I checked with an ex US FAA ATC colleague as to how the use their radar for weather. He did not know specifically what kit brought the picture to their screens but it does display in 'real' time. Weather information in his words is a 'big deal'. If they are known to have not relayed known weather information to an aircraft they are disciplined. The weather radar is inherently accurate unless there is a major storm. The weather is shown as light, moderate, heavy and severe. He did not know the exact update rate on their screens but would be measure in minutes not seconds. When observing weather they are to inform the aircraft and ask for their intentions. The most common outcome is that the aircraft then elects to change course using their own airborne radar and their eyeballs. On request the ATC will vector around the displayed weather on their screens. There is no published tolerance by which the radar paints will be made to miss displayed weather. The Vectors are given with the onus on the pilot to accept the advice and for the pilot to keep reviewing the info given by ATC cross checked with their own aircraft radar and what they see out the window.
From my time in OZ as mentioned above the weather radar was just the BoM site displayed on a secondary screen and was for info only. I do recall that we could give information only but not outside of a strange distance like 60km from the weather station. I'd be all for having weather information displayed on any radar screen I used with accuracy enough to actually give and execute navigation advice. If your intent Dick is to pursue this I am all for it and you have my 100% support. Please do. As an ATC I certainly will get much benefit to absolutely no cost to myself........
From my time in OZ as mentioned above the weather radar was just the BoM site displayed on a secondary screen and was for info only. I do recall that we could give information only but not outside of a strange distance like 60km from the weather station. I'd be all for having weather information displayed on any radar screen I used with accuracy enough to actually give and execute navigation advice. If your intent Dick is to pursue this I am all for it and you have my 100% support. Please do. As an ATC I certainly will get much benefit to absolutely no cost to myself........
Sorry for the slight drift but is related, we operated into YPPH a few weeks ago and asked for the 200 foot winds due to a reasonable tailwind on finals. We're told "not available" and ATC explained on landing that they still have the tools to provide this but now NOT allowed to provide it. Perth can be tricky and this use to be readily available. ATC were equally annoyed and directed us to email air services directly. Anybody provide further scope on this?
Sure, anyone can get the weather on their 3/4G phone but you certainly wouldn't want to rely on it particularly for any life changing weather related decisions.
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The public BoM radar page carries a disclaimer. Indeed it is very useful and often (but not always) accurate. I cannot confirm but I imagine that's why it's only a secondary/advisory support system to ATC.
I believe the BoM were once sued by the widows of the victims of that awful weather event that affected the Sydney to Hobart yacht race some years ago. Even though the BoM got the weather forecast right on the day, the abovementioned disclaimer is what saved them from losing the case. The BoM was then engaged by these widows to successfully sue the yacht club who failed their duty of care to relay the updated weather forecast to their members.
I'm led to believe there are more empirical radar data sets available from the BoM than that public BoM radar page, but integrating that into the ATC system is a decision for the politicians as it will cost money, and sadly by looking at the current state of GA we all know that isn't going to happen any time soon.
I believe the BoM were once sued by the widows of the victims of that awful weather event that affected the Sydney to Hobart yacht race some years ago. Even though the BoM got the weather forecast right on the day, the abovementioned disclaimer is what saved them from losing the case. The BoM was then engaged by these widows to successfully sue the yacht club who failed their duty of care to relay the updated weather forecast to their members.
I'm led to believe there are more empirical radar data sets available from the BoM than that public BoM radar page, but integrating that into the ATC system is a decision for the politicians as it will cost money, and sadly by looking at the current state of GA we all know that isn't going to happen any time soon.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Squawk7700 - I wouldn't want to bet my life on it, but my experience is that Telstra 4G is available 95% of the time flying VFR around the southern states.
The aviation smart phone apps now even overlay weather radar over aviation maps. I'd never leave my iPhone behind and have even installed a USB socket in the plane to avoid a flat battery.
The aviation smart phone apps now even overlay weather radar over aviation maps. I'd never leave my iPhone behind and have even installed a USB socket in the plane to avoid a flat battery.