Piston ban on Gabo Island
From the first post and the media report, its about performance, nothing to do with the over water segment
Harts would of responded to the Clients guidelines
Had plenty of experience dealing with Harts and always found them excellent
Harts would of responded to the Clients guidelines
Had plenty of experience dealing with Harts and always found them excellent
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you ever seen the glide ratio of Pac750????,,,,,,not for me thanks
Corrupt system...
...Harts would of responded to the Clients guidelines...
.
Binghi, who are you calling corrupt, the State, Harts or both
edit - spelling as usual
edit - spelling as usual
via megle2:
Binghi, who are you calling corrupt, the State, Harts or both
Binghi, who are you calling corrupt, the State, Harts or both
megle2, as you are championing Harts and commenting on how the report came about, i.e. "responding to the clients guidelines", a question for ya:
Why would the Harts report recommend no piston engine aircraft to use the subject airfield ?
.
Binghi, I'm not championing anyone
As for the report, no idea
As for the report, no idea
Problem is this is not a good example because Lipmann has crashed more aircraft up that way than all operators combined.
Whatever your smoking, can I have some, it must be real good sh1t!!
The figures (verified statistics) presented to the Regional Aviation Association Conference and NSW (you do know the difference between NSW and QLD, do you?) Tourism Task Force were for the whole of Australia over many years, and certainly nothing to do with one operator.
Next time, read the post before you hit the keyboard.
Tootle pip!!