Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Exactly why would/should you buy or not buy a Brumby?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Exactly why would/should you buy or not buy a Brumby?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2015, 14:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From their own web site:

News - Brumby Aircraft Australia

When the joint venture is fully implemented, airframes will be manufactured in China to Brumby specifications and under Brumby’s quality control. The completed airframes will then be sent to the Brumby factory in Cowra, NSW at which time the engine, instruments, radios and any special paint options will be added before the aircraft is finally flight tested, certified by Brumby Australia and released to the customer.
Derfred is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2015, 18:29
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 452
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
All the spin in the world will not help if you cannot deliver in a reasonable time frame what is no doubt a good product.
On eyre is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2015, 23:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It must be said that the Brumby AirCruiser shares the name only with the Victa designed and built AirCruiser. Additionally the Brumby named one has nought to do with the CT4 either.

There was only ever one AirCruiser built by Victa that eventually went to NZ and from that the CT4 morphed.

THE AirCruiser is again Australian owned and domiciled.

Tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2015, 00:17
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,878
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Tipsy are you referring to their page wording below?

Brumby engineers are currently working on the final design of the new AirCruiser and while only one AirCruiser has been produced to date, the highly successful military air training aircraft known as the CT-4 was derived from the AirCruiser design but up-graded to aerobatic standard. The CT-4 is used by the Royal Australian Air Force, the Royal New Zealand Air Force and the Royal Thai Air Force for ab initio flight training.
I'd be surprised if these figures were achieved, as in, often adding 100hp doesn't always add a stack of knots.

n its basic 210 hp piston configuration, the AirCruiser will have a cruising speed similar to or exceeding speeds of well-respected Cessna and Piper models such as the Piper Archer III and the Cessna 172s.

The 310 hp Continental will deliver cruising speeds and useful load capabilities similar to the highly successful Cirrus SR22 but at a significantly reduced capital cost.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2015, 01:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was making the point of historical accuracy.

The wording on the website is deceptively ambiguous.

You are totally correct when you say "adding 100hp doesn't always add a stack of knots".

Tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2015, 01:38
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anybody know, then, what relationship (if any) Brumby's projected AirCruiser has to Henry Millicer's Aircruiser design?
Stanwell is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2015, 02:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stanwell, Brumby Aircruiser P/L of Cowra NSW are the Type Certificate Holders of T/C VA520. This is the latest incarnation of the original Victa owned Type Certificate 34-4 from 1967.

As to a relationship with Henry's original design, I think the photo's on the website answer that pretty clearly.

Tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2015, 03:34
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you look at the Aircruiser wing it becomes apparent where the CT4 came from.

Would be wonderful if the Aircruiser was produced.
peterc005 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2015, 04:18
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, Tipsy.
Stanwell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.