Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Pilot Licences.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jan 2015, 20:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kerikeri New Zealand
Age: 89
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot Licences.

I used to hold an ATPL for NZ,USA,UK,IRE,LUX.
Big deal!
I also hold a motor car licence that is NZ issued and is valid world wide, with only a couple of exemptions.
So what is different.
I can fly(when Young enough) a NZ registered aircraft almost anywhere in the world, but I cannot fly the same type model aircraft in most countries in the world because my NZ licence is not recognized in total.
The Civil Aviation's Administrations in operations seem to think that they each individually, invented the wheel, and that ones home country, do not do things correctly.
I can state categorically the the differences in the rules and acceptable practices around the world, are almost identical.
My question: When will all the signatories to the ICAO system get there marbles into one bag and allow all pilots be is private or commercial fly for a living or otherwise in the county of their choice(Language difference exempt) without this soul searching re qualifications?

Old Flatulence .
gulfairs is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2015, 20:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot Licences.

When they can make more money that way.
Dash8driver1312 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2015, 21:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At 79 you will need a drivers licence medical to drive a car in NSW and this medical can be converted into a DL medical to fly any aircraft you are qualified to fly up to 1500kg VFR day with two on board. Your Kiwi licence is a FAA equivalent which should be accepted most everywhere. (although the DL medical is peculiar to Australia). Both Australia and NZ are ICAO signatories. The Australian DL medical simply activates your existing licence with restrictions. Although, the air is different in Australia and Bernouli's theorem doesn't wash in our air so CAsA will probably make you do something concerning nothing that will cost you heaps. I once helped an 80 year old retain his licence, but that was all due to a jaundiced view of a now departed AVMED individual. (a Kiwi crossed with something he was).
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2015, 23:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"will make you do something concerning nothing that will cost you heaps"

Brilliant.
currawong is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2015, 23:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never...unfortunately

My question: When will all the signatories to the ICAO system get there marbles into one bag and allow all pilots be is private or commercial fly for a living or otherwise in the county of their choice(Language difference exempt) without this soul searching re qualifications?
I'd say never. Or at least not in my lifetime unfortunately, which is such a pity.

I hold ATPLs from 4 countries. I had to travel overseas a couple of weeks ago just to renew the Class 1 medical for my UK licence despite holding Class 1 medicals from 3 other countries with an identical standard.

I agree with you completely that the current system of individual national licences is a joke.

Unfortunately, I can't see this ridiculous situation changing anytime soon. The bureaucracies in each country are so entrenched. They will not give up their kingdoms without a fight. And then, even if they were willing, getting agreement at ICAO, followed by ratification in each national parliament around the world...well, dreaming is the polite way to put it.

PG

Last edited by Popgun; 11th Jan 2015 at 01:12. Reason: Added quote
Popgun is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 00:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
"will make you do something concerning nothing that will cost you heaps"
Yeah, right up there with CASA's Mission Statemtent - "We're not happy until your not happy"!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 00:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember leaving Australia and how good it felt to
get away from a bureaucratic nightmare that
is a money grab by bureaucrats to pay
an incredible number of employees who effectively
engage in make work projects to continue their own employment
while continuously escalating their charges from a decreasing number
of users.

CASA's refusal to accept overseas medicals
is, from the point of CASA perspective, is tantamount to preventing coaches with bullion from
traveling their highways because they still have, plenty of easier victims locally.


They miss out on Australia Pilots overseas paying a ransom, to have their medicals from overseas validating their Australia licences.

Ditto for failing to accept overseas renewals of Instrument ratings etc.

Being a Charter Operator, or aircraft owner is about the same as having
a very large number of public servants putting their hand up your dress.
Ramjet555 is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 01:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're all the same!

I can't speak to Canada...but in my view, they're all the same.

In this matter, CASA is no worse (nor better) than the NZ CAA, the US FAA and the UK's CAA.

Box ticking, Yes Minister, bureaucratic numpties that fail to add any aviation safety-related value yet love taking licensing and processing fees to fund continued growth of their empire.

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 02:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 273
Received 39 Likes on 9 Posts
Just renewed my FAA, EASA(UK) and CASA First Class Medicals.
EASA and FAA - 1 page straightforward application.
CASA - 11 Page embarrassment of an application smattered with obtuse & ridiculous questions

Just renewed the biennial ASIC. Application requires Government certified ID. Me - Will you accept my current ASIC that says "AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT" on it? ASIC Authority - No, definitely not!
ASIC - What joke & a rort! Several countries have rejected my ASIC as a Crew ID - because it does not say anything along the lines of "Crew ID" on it!

Australia, as a friend has just said = Madly Expensive Ineptocracy

Ineptocracy
(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy)
A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

Says it all really
ramble on is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.