Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Restarting out of production aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Restarting out of production aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Nov 2014, 00:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Restarting out of production aircraft

The twin otter appears to be a huge success again after years out of production.

I thought I'd ask the panel what other aircraft could back again and what could make them viable today given new technologies and emerging markets.

For mine, the Short SD360 made sense for its spaciousness and simplicity. Just iron out a few imperfections (bit noisy) and maybe there's a new market opportunity. Is pressurisation all that necessary for sub 100nm sectors?

Any comments?
Nulli Secundus is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 03:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chieftan, Comanche, 210, Cessna 400 series……

V Tails
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 03:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gods Country
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like a C210 made from composites
Lancair70 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 04:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cloud9
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good ol Beaver
solowflyer is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 04:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only reason Viking is succeeding with the Twotter is that it is a specialised aircraft with a specific market.

Airframe wise a Kingair has probably the same labour component as a Chieftain or a 402. If a Chieftain or 402 were reintroduced to the market they would probably cost in the region of 1.5m. Yeah right!

It is the capital cost that is the big killer to restart aircraft in a tight market, where Joe and Jane public expect to pay $59 for a seat for a 1 hour trip!

After Cessna butchered the C206H to make it heaver, slower and less payload I am pleased that they have not continued and bastardised their finest. The C180/185!
c100driver is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 04:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V tails OMG.

Viking was taking about turbine single otter and beavers some time back but as with the 400 series twin otter cost is prohibitive. They not selling as many as the thought Shame. Great aircraft done a heap of work on them all over the place.
yr right is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 04:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Greta
Age: 67
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gippsland before they where bought out talked of the Nomad
fencehopper is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 05:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lost in the space-time continuum
Posts: 455
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
After Cessna butchered the C206H to make it heaver, slower and less payload I am pleased that they have not continued and bastardised their finest. The C180/185!
No, but they could pump out a few more of these!



And just for you Lancair, Cessna's take on where they thought the 210 was headed.



Other than the stillborn Cessna NGP and the misconceived 162, this was the last time that Cessna put any serious R&D into their S/E line up, just on 30 years ago!

The wing was of composite construction with a NLF airfoil, same span but a lot smaller in area and full of fuel. With the larger tanks and bigger tail Cessna were on the way to somewhere else with the 210 airframe. What a shame it was the General Dynamics came along and buggered things up.
gassed budgie is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 05:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Dash10 C441 Conquest
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 05:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chieftan, Comanche, 210, Cessna 400 series……
So far as the single Comanche goes check out the Raven 500. Ravin Aircraft
27/09 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 06:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mosquito, Lancaster, Beaufighter
Walking Ballast is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 06:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: YLIL
Posts: 250
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jabiru
triton140 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 06:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airtourer.
peterc005 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 06:15
  #14 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,976
Received 104 Likes on 59 Posts
If a Chieftain or 402 were reintroduced to the market they would probably cost in the region of 1.5m. Yeah right!
Dash10 C441 Conquest

Really have no idea m'self as to whether or not that would be an accurate figure c100driver, but does anyone else think that the day will come where the abovementioned aircraft, suitably modernised/updated will have to have production restarted simply because the existing fleets will be too bloody old?

Walking Ballast; To that list you can add the Hawker Tempest V.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 07:36
  #15 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,884
Received 156 Likes on 50 Posts
The whole Cessna line. Produced in 2014. They would be lovely aircraft.
SOPS is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 08:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Ooooooohhhhh pinky....that was so cold
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 08:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A new Barron is over the 1 million mark. One would think you be looking around the 2 mill plus for a chieftain. Last time I looked the 400 Viking was nearly 5 mill
yr right is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 09:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: On Airport
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo prop Chieftain would be nice
Nibbles2310 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 10:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 565
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
Turbo prop Chieftain would be nice
Piper PA-42 Cheyenne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
kingRB is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2014, 11:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gods Country
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo prop Chieftain would be nice
To be honest don't you mean PA-31T
Lancair70 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.