PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Restarting out of production aircraft (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/551231-restarting-out-production-aircraft.html)

Nulli Secundus 14th Nov 2014 00:50

Restarting out of production aircraft
 
The twin otter appears to be a huge success again after years out of production.

I thought I'd ask the panel what other aircraft could back again and what could make them viable today given new technologies and emerging markets.

For mine, the Short SD360 made sense for its spaciousness and simplicity. Just iron out a few imperfections (bit noisy) and maybe there's a new market opportunity. Is pressurisation all that necessary for sub 100nm sectors?

Any comments?

Jabawocky 14th Nov 2014 03:23

Chieftan, Comanche, 210, Cessna 400 series……

V Tails :E

Lancair70 14th Nov 2014 03:31

I'd like a C210 made from composites :}

solowflyer 14th Nov 2014 04:06

Good ol Beaver

c100driver 14th Nov 2014 04:21

The only reason Viking is succeeding with the Twotter is that it is a specialised aircraft with a specific market.

Airframe wise a Kingair has probably the same labour component as a Chieftain or a 402. If a Chieftain or 402 were reintroduced to the market they would probably cost in the region of 1.5m. Yeah right!

It is the capital cost that is the big killer to restart aircraft in a tight market, where Joe and Jane public expect to pay $59 for a seat for a 1 hour trip!

After Cessna butchered the C206H to make it heaver, slower and less payload I am pleased that they have not continued and bastardised their finest. The C180/185!

yr right 14th Nov 2014 04:22

V tails OMG.

Viking was taking about turbine single otter and beavers some time back but as with the 400 series twin otter cost is prohibitive. They not selling as many as the thought Shame. Great aircraft done a heap of work on them all over the place.

fencehopper 14th Nov 2014 04:27

Gippsland before they where bought out talked of the Nomad :bored:

gassed budgie 14th Nov 2014 05:40


After Cessna butchered the C206H to make it heaver, slower and less payload I am pleased that they have not continued and bastardised their finest. The C180/185!
No, but they could pump out a few more of these!

http://imageshack.com/a/img540/2410/sjxWYj.jpg

And just for you Lancair, Cessna's take on where they thought the 210 was headed.

http://imageshack.com/a/img42/6748/imagewsu.jpg

Other than the stillborn Cessna NGP and the misconceived 162, this was the last time that Cessna put any serious R&D into their S/E line up, just on 30 years ago!

The wing was of composite construction with a NLF airfoil, same span but a lot smaller in area and full of fuel. With the larger tanks and bigger tail Cessna were on the way to somewhere else with the 210 airframe. What a shame it was the General Dynamics came along and buggered things up.

OZBUSDRIVER 14th Nov 2014 05:53

Dash10 C441 Conquest

27/09 14th Nov 2014 05:55


Chieftan, Comanche, 210, Cessna 400 series……
So far as the single Comanche goes check out the Raven 500. Ravin Aircraft

Walking Ballast 14th Nov 2014 06:01

Mosquito, Lancaster, Beaufighter

triton140 14th Nov 2014 06:09

Jabiru :E

peterc005 14th Nov 2014 06:12

Airtourer.

Pinky the pilot 14th Nov 2014 06:15


If a Chieftain or 402 were reintroduced to the market they would probably cost in the region of 1.5m. Yeah right!

Dash10 C441 Conquest

Really have no idea m'self as to whether or not that would be an accurate figure c100driver, but does anyone else think that the day will come where the abovementioned aircraft, suitably modernised/updated will have to have production restarted simply because the existing fleets will be too bloody old?:eek:

Walking Ballast; To that list you can add the Hawker Tempest V.:E

SOPS 14th Nov 2014 07:36

The whole Cessna line. Produced in 2014. They would be lovely aircraft.

OZBUSDRIVER 14th Nov 2014 08:15

Ooooooohhhhh pinky....that was so cold:{

yr right 14th Nov 2014 08:55

A new Barron is over the 1 million mark. One would think you be looking around the 2 mill plus for a chieftain. Last time I looked the 400 Viking was nearly 5 mill

Nibbles2310 14th Nov 2014 09:38

Turbo prop Chieftain would be nice

kingRB 14th Nov 2014 10:43


Turbo prop Chieftain would be nice
Piper PA-42 Cheyenne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lancair70 14th Nov 2014 11:20


Turbo prop Chieftain would be nice
To be honest don't you mean PA-31T


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.