Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Prang at mudgee 14/9/14, 2 dead

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Sep 2014, 01:43
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Theville
Age: 43
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
all it takes is an unforecast increase in headwind component, a slight dirtying of the airframe, or some pitting of the propeller paint or flying with the balance ball slightly off centre and said cautious pilot may find himself not quite making the circuit.
If your fuel planning is that tight that your paint is a consideration, go and hand in your license to the nearest casa chap...
Username here is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 02:20
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: darwin
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YMDG crash

Aircraft absolutely did not run out of fuel. It had plenty left in the tanks when it made it to the ground.
anthos92 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 03:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Planning

I absolutely agree with the sentiments of Username Here. For anyone to plan Flight Fuel only with no Reserves is unthinkable. We have no evidence that fuel exhaustion was a factor on this tragic event. In fact, we have no evidence. Let us wait for the experts to determine the cause or probable cause and then comment.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 03:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
all it takes is an unforecast increase in headwind component, a slight dirtying of the airframe, or some pitting of the propeller paint or flying with the balance ball slightly off centre and said cautious pilot may find himself not quite making the circuit.
Surely you are not serious!
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 04:31
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fuel Planning
I absolutely agree with the sentiments of Username Here. For anyone to plan Flight Fuel only with no Reserves is unthinkable. We have no evidence that fuel exhaustion was a factor on this tragic event. In fact, we have no evidence. Let us wait for the experts to determine the cause or probable cause and then comment.
Unthinkable enough that every airliner you step foot on plans company minimum fuel at destination airport.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 05:57
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
"Company minimum" is a bit different to "nil reserves"

Last edited by Horatio Leafblower; 15th Sep 2014 at 05:57. Reason: Fat fingers
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 06:02
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ...outside the wall...
Age: 68
Posts: 170
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
....ah yes, Blyesky, but "company minimum fuel" is not the same as "no reserves" is it?

Last edited by ravan; 15th Sep 2014 at 06:03. Reason: Horatio beat me by a whisker.
ravan is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 06:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Planning

Blueskymine, I don't know what your qualifications are but I can tell you I am not in the least surprised that airlines carry only fuel needed to meet legal requirements which certainly does not mean arriving at destination without reserve fuel plus alternate if required. To carry any more than required adds to fuel burn due to the added weight and, in some instances, would reduce payload availability where performance means a TOW below MTOW permissable for the aircraft.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 08:04
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,878
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Mr. Banjo, your interpretation of "took out a fence" is vastly different to mine and others. The fence is mostly in tact with seemingly all posts accounted for. It is abundantly clear that it lacked forward speed at impact otherwise it would be largely survivable.

That being said someone told me that the fence was cut to allow emergency services access, but that is un-verified.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 08:22
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bathurst NSW AUS
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The shots from the local TV news appear to show upward bending of the nose and wings, that would be consistent with high vertical forces, wondering though with the proximity of the trees a branch has impacted with the canopy, helping to wipe a lot off forward speed and causing the injuries... Just thinking out loud...
garrya100 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 10:14
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,878
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
I was waiting for the link to be drawn regarding the passenger not being in the aircraft when crews arrived, that makes sense, thank you for the information. That makes it double the tragedy really, a terrible way to go.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 14:54
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess its entirely possible the pilot had an onset of cardiac arrest on the approach, that made him lose control - but then he could have climbed out and had the full-on heart attack or stroke, just outside the aircraft.
The shock of a high G crash landing also just might have loosened some clot that then moved into a major heart or brain artery? I'm no medic, but "embolism" rings a bell. I believe it's not unknown to also have an elderly partner suffer a cardiac arrest, when they see their partner have a cardiac event.

Arterial embolism: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia
onetrack is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 15:14
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
Unthinkable enough that every airliner you step foot on plans company minimum fuel at destination airport.
Rubbish.
Only about half of the airline flights I am on have "company minimum fuel at destination" and if they do have "company minimum fuel at destination" , they have over an hour of reserve.
Back on topic, hopefully something can be learned from the investigation. Until then, my condolences to those who knew them.
framer is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 17:13
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The same condolences from us. Truly tragic.

I understand the fence was cut by emergency services.


We can only echo what had been said before - They died doing what they loved doing. Amen.

Last edited by Stanwell; 15th Sep 2014 at 17:27.
Stanwell is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 18:04
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If it was a stall/spin, it is noted that in pommieland , stall warners are required to be fitted to the rv6. Theres not a lot of warning in that type of aircraft....not required in US/OZ.
frangatang is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 23:03
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's called a "stickshaker".
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 01:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RV characteristics

I did some test flight engineering on a friend's RV6 quite a while ago(one of the last under 101.28), helped with some flight tests and subsequently did a tailwheel endorsement in the aircraft. I've also flown an RV7A.

Some observations:
The RV6/7 had a weakness in that the longerons in the cockpit area could fail under crash loads and the cockpit area fold up. Daffyd Llewellyn designed a fix in the form of some steel tube added in that area.

The NACA 23012/23015 series airfoils used have an abrupt stall. Stall on the RV6 at gross was 52KIAS clean and 49KIAS with full flap. The airspeed system was honest (measured by GPS and IAS to TAS technique).
No aerodynamic stall warning. Pitch down and wing drop.

The RV6 with O-360 CS prop and a nice paint job but no excessive panel bling was 505Kg empty. Max Gross is 726kg. A model (nosewheel has I think another 50 lbs or 23 Kg) Doesn't leave much disposable for 140 liters of fuel, people and bags.

I suspect most RV6s are flown over designer's gross at takeoff when flown two up unless fitted with O-320 and fixed pitch wooden prop.
Eyrie is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 04:27
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine/Prop

The accident aircraft was a tail-wheeled model with 0-320 and fixed pitch wooden propeller. If the aircraft departed Dubbo it is only a short flight to Mudgee and I doubt fuel exhaustion would have been a factor, although I have seen no evidence for or against.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 05:10
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,878
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
An earlier poster suggested that there was ample fuel left on-board.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2014, 05:33
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aus, or USA, or UK or EU, or possibly somehwere in Asia.
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew Terry for many years and flew with him in this aircraft on several occasions.

He was a careful and prudent pilot, though not 'overlycautious'. he flew the aircraft often after getting it in the air and was serious about learning to fly it correctly. He was a good planner and not a risk taker, the aircraft was well constructed and nicely finished.

I am surprised, and saddened, of course. They were part of a small crew that really enjoy putting some air under the wings on fly aways, and a larger social crew at YLTV. Their loss is one that is being felt strongly.

HD
HarleyD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.