Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

RPT priority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2014, 00:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RPT priority

Is there a CASA reference that states that RPT aircraft have priority over other non RPT aircraft?

If so could somebody please "enlighten" me with the book reference.

Cheers
aussie.pilot.. is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No reference, but it is suggested in the aip that aircraft flying for commerce should be given priority.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz
Posts: 311
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
ENR 1.4-19 and ENR 1.4-20
esreverlluf is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As has been pointed to here with the above post.
The worlds aviation infrastructure is built mainly on commercial traffic (RPT) it exists for that mainly & they pay the most for that infrastructure hence they have the priority.

Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Not on the ground
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a Reference in both

There is a reference in both the AIP and Jepps about ATC priority for types of traffic.

I don't have my jepps with me but from memory it is in early ATC-AU-108ish but in the AIP it is ENR 1.4-18-10.1 through to 10.4. (Regulation of Flight - Assessment of priorities) 10.1 is Emergency 10.2 is training 10.3 is Scheduled Air Services and 10.4 is The order of priority in processing aircraft at Sydney.

I think this is what your after?

Cheers
dayzel87 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I thought he was suggesting in a class g situation.

Yes regulation of flight assessment of priorities applies in a controlled environment.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:35
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop

I was actually specifically interested in a class D environment.
I understand that the ATC has overall control. It seems that sometimes they get it wrong.
aussie.pilot.. is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 02:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
When all charter becomes RPT does that mean the C210s will be getting equal priority with the 717s?
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 03:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Where it don't rain
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you are referring to the diversions to YMAV yesterday, it may have something to do with the fuel state of those pesky RPT jets, which had diverted during closure of YMML. If your not referring to these events then please disregard.
rowdy trousers is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 03:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'Ozzie P' I think you will find most of the answers here where ref to Airspace around the major centers, Class D wasn't mentioned in yr original Q.
But having said that the guy in the Twr at a Class D drome would be looking at the big picture stuff such as Sched's due slot times etc not only any priority the RPT might have.
These ATC'ers are usually local guys/gals in a much quieter environment so they kinda see the situation slightly diff than the major rat race dromes where dog eats dog & a certain Airline owns the sky above them


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 11:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
I understand that the ATC has overall control. It seems that sometimes they get it wrong.
Do they? How about giving us the incident/scenario and we might be able to comment. Otherwise, we'll have to keep pulling teeth to work out what you're on about.

When all charter becomes RPT does that mean the C210s will be getting equal priority with the 717s?
Speed and weight will determine that!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 13:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
As a Class D controller usually first in best dressed. However, it is much easier for a light aircraft to see a 737 or 717 etc and follow than make a jet orbit on a 10 mile final because he couldn't see a baron. So sometime you may get a bit extended for that type of reason.

Is this the sort of scenario you mean? I can think of numerous other reasons where I may get the RPT jet away ahead of the slower light aircraft but without a specific example I may as well tell you my theory on MH370

PS - The above is how I personally manage traffic, each controller may vary
Awol57 is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 01:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I was more taking a dig at the new rules coming in. At the two Class D aerodromes I've been based out of that mix RPT and GA traffic I think the controllers do a great job of balancing everyone. Sure I've done orbits or had to descend below CTA steps but I've also had jets conduct longer finals or slow their speed to get me in before them. Or jets requiring a backtrack holding at the holding point to get the long line of pistons (with sweating pilots and passengers) away first.

Good job boys and girls!
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 06:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Running up that hill
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I read AIP and MATS correctly, outside civil capital city CTR, scheduled has no priority.

At SY they get priority over non-jet non-scheduled, GA and training, and at the others just GA and training.

So outside SY, scheduled and non-scheduled are the same priority anyway, and outside capital cities that priority is nil.
Nautilus Blue is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 09:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"significant economic benefit'
Hempy is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 10:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good airmanship covers it.

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 13:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bloggsie old mate, how do you plan to go faster and put on weight, at your age and all

Jabawocky is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 11:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flights such as medevac / polair do get priority in Class D as they do at other towers. After that, arriving aircraft generally have priority over departing aircraft, then it comes down to making the traffic flow as good as possible. It can be slowing down a RPT to fit in behind a C172 or delaying a non RPT to expedite a sequence of traffic.

Of course many things can affect this, weather, pilot and controller experience, local knowledge, unexpected traffic, equipment failures, etc.

Some examples from today. B738 extended downwind to following an Airvan. A320 held lined up for 3 minutes to facilitate a DHC8 on DME arrival. DHC8 slowed on approach and a E190 processed via an instrument approach to give priority arrival to flying doctor BE20.


Hope this helps.
89 steps to heaven is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 11:50
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
G'day Jabba,
I think it could be velocity, the heavier you are the faster you get to your destination......i may be wrong.
sms777 is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 23:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: whoop whoop
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would not state that we get it wrong. Getting it wrong would mean that life's would have be lost, we all don't want that I would state that we may not have chosen the best option at the time, I am guilty myself. But it really comes down to safety. After that, we will do our best to make it expeditious.

If the controller is not comfortable with it, it not going to happen. Putting one more aircraft in the air could be just that one too many to keep it all running smoothly, jeopardising safety, as well as putting too much workload on the controller itself.

It really does depend on what the big picture is. E.g there could be only 2 on frequency, but may be a lot that just about to be handed off from other sectors. Its hard to tell.

But what I would suggest is trying to make a visit to your local tower. Most are more then willing to talk to pilots, I know I am. It would help you see what we are up to as well. There can be a lot going on behind the scene that you don't see, as it is for us. We try to do cockpit visit as well to get a pilots point of view.

Hope this helps.
swamp_1984 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.