New Cylinder AD's released by FAA
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now 5/80 is not research at all. Un less it carried out on a calibrated dyno how can you ever say what power the cly is producing.
We know that unequal power from the six cylinders produces engine roughness. The fact that Walter ran his engine at 5/80 and it was absolutely smooth is proof positive it was producing full power.
Compression = power
A low cly will not make as much power as a cly running at 70/80.
A low cly will not make as much power as a cly running at 70/80.
And now you are say I give miss quotes we'll no you given out dangerous information
John Deakin
Mr Deakin: It's not worth your or Mr Atkinson's time responding to this troll. It is obvious to me that yr right understands, with crystal clarity, the points you are making. He has to understand them in order to choose, with surgical precision, the points about which he pretends to disagree.
That's why a number of us initially thought yr right was David Brown in disguise!
That's why a number of us initially thought yr right was David Brown in disguise!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm me no one else but myself. However I know who you are and your past. I'm no troll.
You sir as I've stated before and there is no change to it.
An ex military know it all that could not make it in the commercial world and ended up where you all do and damage the aviation community.
Go back to your hole and under your bridge. You added very little as you have zero understanding of what is what on this subject.
But still no answer how you said one thing at the start and a second at the end so which is it.
Cheers
You sir as I've stated before and there is no change to it.
An ex military know it all that could not make it in the commercial world and ended up where you all do and damage the aviation community.
Go back to your hole and under your bridge. You added very little as you have zero understanding of what is what on this subject.
But still no answer how you said one thing at the start and a second at the end so which is it.
Cheers
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And points that I put out are because what is said is wrong. I'm not a sheep I have a brain and I'm allowed to use it. I notice they quick to cya in an event that I find them lacking in and then try to discredit me.
Notice nothing back on leak rate or sb or stuff like that. Yet it shows he made two references that opposed each other.
I just would like a balance debate. Not a you will do cause we said. And remember it's NOT data it is obverations they have. Data is produced by manufactures and others that have there findings approved and an a STC issued. I and every other engineer cannot do work unless it is approved Data. Check casa out on this hey creamie
Cheers
Notice nothing back on leak rate or sb or stuff like that. Yet it shows he made two references that opposed each other.
I just would like a balance debate. Not a you will do cause we said. And remember it's NOT data it is obverations they have. Data is produced by manufactures and others that have there findings approved and an a STC issued. I and every other engineer cannot do work unless it is approved Data. Check casa out on this hey creamie
Cheers
And remember it's NOT data it is obverations they have.
With all due respects yr right, these people have way more data than you could ever comprehend.
Check casa out on this hey
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With respect bob I'm sorry but is not data that can be used that's the point. Data must be approved to be able to use. In this case it's observed only. If it is approved data via an stc then it can be called data.
We don't and can't deal with what ifs it very simple.
Yes casa bunch of wallowing wombats you don't have to tell me that. I have to deal with them daily. However they set the rules and as such I have to obey by them.
I alone have so much dirt on them I can wright a book.
And just because they on another level to me dose not mean they have the answers to all as has been shown. Ie super cooled fuel I think not.
Sorry I am not a sheep. They also said we don't think maybe they need to revisit that subject as we'll cause a lot of us do. Do you know why most lames don't comment on pprune cause they can't put up with the bs that said. I've struck true to what I have said but I notice the other side back tracking. I also note note nothing said about saying one thing and then another.
And another thing don't even know a David brown
But a debate is good just don't be a sheep and be lead. Think about stuff look at it. Funny how it's been hijacked again.
Cheers.
We don't and can't deal with what ifs it very simple.
Yes casa bunch of wallowing wombats you don't have to tell me that. I have to deal with them daily. However they set the rules and as such I have to obey by them.
I alone have so much dirt on them I can wright a book.
And just because they on another level to me dose not mean they have the answers to all as has been shown. Ie super cooled fuel I think not.
Sorry I am not a sheep. They also said we don't think maybe they need to revisit that subject as we'll cause a lot of us do. Do you know why most lames don't comment on pprune cause they can't put up with the bs that said. I've struck true to what I have said but I notice the other side back tracking. I also note note nothing said about saying one thing and then another.
And another thing don't even know a David brown
But a debate is good just don't be a sheep and be lead. Think about stuff look at it. Funny how it's been hijacked again.
Cheers.
So anyway, we all know what the 1940's-based leak check procedure and the 1940s-based maintenance rules require when the procedure results in a number that is beyond specification.
The APS/GAMI people are merely trying to help bring GA into the 1990s. For some, that's too big a change.
That's one of the reasons GA's in inexorable decline in Australia: Too many people and too many rules stuck in the last century.
The APS/GAMI people are merely trying to help bring GA into the 1990s. For some, that's too big a change.
That's one of the reasons GA's in inexorable decline in Australia: Too many people and too many rules stuck in the last century.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
yr right, you have a short memory. Very short.
I am David Brown. Although we may not have met you knew exactly who I was right from the start. Who are you?
I am afraid you are wrong on the approved data front. That is from a maintainers perspective (thats you when doing a specific task accoding to CASA requirements) not from a scientists perspective. All the gathered data that folk like Walter and John and myself refer to is actually in support of the data that has been collected since pre WWII. And support is that of TCM and LYC, P&W, CW and and and......
Your lack of willingness to learn from it is where the problem is. Not in the data or its acredited source. And by the way much of the data we are refrring to has been collected for the FAA's certification work on many different things, including the future of unleaded avgas. Trust me on this, I have seen far more approved data for the FAA than you are likely to ever want to see.
So cut the Willy wagging, I have no desire to get into that as I figure you can trump us all with that
BTW, Walter and John have over the last 20 years been involved in as much or possibly way more than me. So get over it.
What bothers me is I could learn something from you, but clearly you can't learn anything from anyone else. It seems the rest of the Army is out of step.
I am David Brown. Although we may not have met you knew exactly who I was right from the start. Who are you?
I am afraid you are wrong on the approved data front. That is from a maintainers perspective (thats you when doing a specific task accoding to CASA requirements) not from a scientists perspective. All the gathered data that folk like Walter and John and myself refer to is actually in support of the data that has been collected since pre WWII. And support is that of TCM and LYC, P&W, CW and and and......
Your lack of willingness to learn from it is where the problem is. Not in the data or its acredited source. And by the way much of the data we are refrring to has been collected for the FAA's certification work on many different things, including the future of unleaded avgas. Trust me on this, I have seen far more approved data for the FAA than you are likely to ever want to see.
So cut the Willy wagging, I have no desire to get into that as I figure you can trump us all with that
BTW, Walter and John have over the last 20 years been involved in as much or possibly way more than me. So get over it.
What bothers me is I could learn something from you, but clearly you can't learn anything from anyone else. It seems the rest of the Army is out of step.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you said a low cly will produce roughness then you said it won't which is it.
A cylinder that is producing LESS POWER than the others (from different mixtures, bad plugs, etc., will cause ROUGHNESS. Fairly noticeable. For example, one cylinder's mixture LOP, the rest ROP, will produce roughness. If all cylinders will run LOP smoothly, then you have pretty good fuel balance. If the fuel is really well balanced, then the engine will not run rough no matter how lean you make it, it will just slowly lose power and die.
My TNIO-550 was like that.
Weak compression (from rings and valve leakage) will generally NOT cause roughness. I say generally, because valve DAMAGE (a chunk of valve missing), or a hole in the piston from Preignition certainly will!
John Deakin
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mr Deakin: It's not worth your or Mr Atkinson's time responding to this troll. It is obvious to me that yr right understands, with crystal clarity, the points you are making. He has to understand them in order to choose, with surgical precision, the points about which he pretends to disagree.
My main concern is that he spreads trash in almost every message. Someone may accept what he says as truth. That's the only reason I've been as persistent as I have.
That's why a number of us initially thought yr right was David Brown in disguise!
John Deakin
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Last Resort
Age: 52
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Casa Troll
It's mind-boggling to think anyone is quite that malignant. I'm not convinced it's an act, but maybe.
For a practising LAME he seems to have a great deal time on his hands to contribute to the forum. Last time I looked LAMES spend every minute of the day trying to survive. Strikes me that he is a public servant with a computer at hand, probably someone who didn't make it the real world and took a government job instead. Remember this forum is a hot bed of resistance to the idiocy of CASA and this white ant is doing a wonderful job of perverting and skewing the agenda through at least two aliases. The signs are easy to recognise if you know what you are looking for. The malignancy is typical of the cancerous culture of CASA.
Sophisticated though he may be he is still a troll and easily dealt with. Ignore him and stop contributing to any discussion he may join, don't give him oxygen, his outrageous and provocative statements will soon cease. The mods will soon realise that he is dropping the hit count and lowering the tone of the forum and they too will lose patience. We are being played like fiddles people!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We'll occy I am dyslexic and have been all my life. I was in A for maths and G for English. I am no Casa spy I have no interest in being in Casa. I am however a hard working lame slut.
A troll you calle why because I'm not a sheep that has to follow I think not. You not said one word execpt to down grade myself. Why because it so far over your head.
Jaba sorry didn't make the connection. So keep putting me down I don't care. The reason your so worried is I speak the truth and put holes in what you are saying to the point you say one thing then another in the same post.
What you can't get over is what your being told is not what is sermon the hangar floor.
The last two weeks I've put my name to over 42 cly inspections how any have you all done and that's not including the Turbine and airframe work.
It's your way or the hwy. now on data I can't even print of a section of the m/m without having to stamp it sign it and date it. So your work is not data that can be used you have not had an stc on it etc etc.
What you can't seam to get over is the fact that what I've been saying is true and correct. Someone in the middle of now where where all there is sand and flys.
So as you state stuff if it's wrong I'll let you know. And I've found a lot wrong and you know it.
But to be called sofizicated fu&k me have you got it all wrong.
Cheers
A troll you calle why because I'm not a sheep that has to follow I think not. You not said one word execpt to down grade myself. Why because it so far over your head.
Jaba sorry didn't make the connection. So keep putting me down I don't care. The reason your so worried is I speak the truth and put holes in what you are saying to the point you say one thing then another in the same post.
What you can't get over is what your being told is not what is sermon the hangar floor.
The last two weeks I've put my name to over 42 cly inspections how any have you all done and that's not including the Turbine and airframe work.
It's your way or the hwy. now on data I can't even print of a section of the m/m without having to stamp it sign it and date it. So your work is not data that can be used you have not had an stc on it etc etc.
What you can't seam to get over is the fact that what I've been saying is true and correct. Someone in the middle of now where where all there is sand and flys.
So as you state stuff if it's wrong I'll let you know. And I've found a lot wrong and you know it.
But to be called sofizicated fu&k me have you got it all wrong.
Cheers