Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

ADS-B Mandate – ATCs Responsible for Deaths?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

ADS-B Mandate – ATCs Responsible for Deaths?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2015, 13:30
  #441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
That's all well and good Porter (I'm not arguing the costs mentioned) but how is that related to the airspace model we currently use? Dick wants people to believe the changes he wants introduced are going to come without a cost to industry and won't require extra controllers. If nothing else where is the money for the training going to come from?

I'm glad to see that GA is also change resistant
le Pingouin is online now  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 07:08
  #442 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Where's the money coming from?
In the case of a friend of mine, well known school, the answer was a $32,000 second mortgage on the house, to equip two aircraft.
The cost is horrendous, the benefit is nil.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 10:30
  #443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly Leadie, the CAsA cost benefit analysis.
The cost is ours, the benefits are theirs.
thorn bird is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2015, 23:15
  #444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
$16,000.00 per aircraft?

Care to fill us plebs in on the work order and purchase list, shouldn't be a state secret?
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2015, 02:08
  #445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Near TownTown
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No ADSB

I have simply dropped our aircraft to NVFR. It will not stop me doing GPS Arrivals OCTA if I need to. Just another example of Australia trying to go it alone and AOPA tugging the forelock to CASA and AsA.
Mr Brewster is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2015, 09:12
  #446 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have simply dropped our aircraft to NVFR. It will not stop me doing GPS Arrivals OCTA if I need to. Just another example of Australia trying to go it alone and AOPA tugging the forelock to CASA and AsA.
Awesome, can you text me when you are doing this, I may need traffic on you when we're both in IMC.
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2015, 06:00
  #447 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
$16,000.00 per aircraft?
Oz,
I will ask, but I believe the aircraft already had a C145 or 146 source available. They were identical aeroplanes, this should have minimized the costs of the engineering orders, load analysis and all those sort of things that add $$$$$ thousands to this sort of job.

Exactly Leadie, the CAsA cost benefit analysis.
The cost is ours, the benefits are theirs.
Thorn Bird,
Nil benefit is guaranteed in this case, they are normally operating in an area and below levels where any ADS-B return is not on the screens of the controllers they are talking to, just their Mode C returns.

This just adds insult to (financial) injury.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 01:21
  #448 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Near TownTown
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries Porter, I will still be on the radio, just in very special VFR ��

Oh, and the quote to upgrade, about $3500 for a compatible transponder, another $8000 for a WAAS GPS plus fitting (cos my non WAAS 430 is no good, even though we don't have WAAS). So $16,000 sounds about right.
Mr Brewster is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 02:14
  #449 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mr Brewster....the magic acronym is not WAAS, it is FDE!

Methinks people are getting confused on what is actually required and what is candy. The requirement is FDE, the supply of that requirment need only be a blind GPS, purely to feed only the transponder.

As a navigator the 129 version 430 is still good. Did you really need to spend the money on a new 430? Did you look at All the alternatives, Mr Brewster?

This is where the argument was blurred a decade ago. Pilots were sold on the idea of a kick arse navigator. AirServices only wanted proof that your unit was excluding dud signals...they do not care what box supplies that information.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 15:10
  #450 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Clearedtoenter,
Just as well we have sooo much good weather, have topos handy, and recalibrate your fickle finger of fate ---- if you can remember how to map read and do a bit of old fashioned DR.
Nobody smokes anymore, so no more 1:1,000,000 matchbox.
Remember how to read a B-20 even. (always preferred P-7s myself, still got an almost new one in a box somewhere).
And don't forget, when you are flying IFRRR (I Follow Roads, Rivers and Railway lines) keep right.
That wonderful Can'tbra cost/benefit, your cost, they benefit.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 23:33
  #451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
CTR, TSO C145/146 is WAAS. As part of the TSO is Fault Detection and Exclusion. This is the bit AirServices is interested in. The NUC (or is it NIC) gives an integrity signal that it is using good data. Good data means integrity of the position, therefore maintain the separation standard.

My post on the C129 gear was prior to hearing of a rumour. Three ground station uplinks are being installed in Perth Brisbane and Melbourne...pointing at the MTSAT...now why would that be happening?
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2015, 01:54
  #452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Near TownTown
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the guy who quoted (on GC) said my 430 was no good and I needed another one.

Way too much to pay for zero benefit. So super special VFR it is
Mr Brewster is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2015, 09:13
  #453 (permalink)  
When you live....
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 0.0221 DME Keyboard
Posts: 983
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Brewster, not sure how much you're interested in the facts where they may conflict with your argument, but here goes anyway:

1. Garmin will upgrade (and fix everything else) on your non-WAAS 430 to make it WAAS. From their website:

List Price: $3,395 USD (subject to change without notice)

Visit an authorized Garmin sales and service center or call (866) 739-5687
Otherwise you can stay 129 compliant and buy a separate postion source such as the Freeflight 1201 - but that's going to cost you not much less than getting a TSO'd GPS.

2. A KT74 transponder is about $3500 (maybe a bit more with the exchange rate) but there are cheaper ones at about $2500 USD (Trig TT31).

So at a cost of $0 for the GPS changeover (*I'll qualify that by saying you need to have the right GPS antenna cable*) and a cost we paid of $1500 AUD installation (including an engineering order) on a Lance, you can do the whole job for just about than half of your $16k.

You still have the problem of finding alternates with only one GPS once all the aids are gone, that I can't help you with beyond saying that in any lighty, fuel reserves the nearest equiped aerodrome for most of the inhabited part of the continent still won't be unreasonable.

I'm also curious as to why you've dropped to NVFR about 8 months before needing to in WA and 18 months before the rest of the country needed it?


UTR
UnderneathTheRadar is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2015, 09:27
  #454 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Near TownTown
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dropped because all my RAD and INST ADs came up.

Even 8K is a lot given I am mostly VFR, only IFR when caught on top which is about 2 or 3 times a year.

I am mostly also below 8000 unless going to Cairns where the dreaded Bellenen Kerr and friend await.

So, nothing in the $8000 for me at all!
Mr Brewster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.