Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Is education required to get a job with major airlines

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Is education required to get a job with major airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 10:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grammar, punctuation, syntax, are going the way of dinosaurs (sadly).
To some extent I agree. However there has to be at least a few people who can get their grammar, punctuation and syntax right otherwise there'll be no SOPS and manuals worth having.
27/09 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 10:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
If you don't have the grammar, then your chances of correctly construing instructions in a manual are zero....

As in "Press any key".............. Where is the "any" key?
Sunfish is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 12:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have never been asked about tertiary qualifications in any job as a Pilot.

It was always hours, experience and flying assessments. The psychometric and behavioural style interviews came into play for large domestic airlines.

In fact I was never asked to provide anything from high school either. I always provided high school results in CVs, but were never asked about it. I know a couple of airlines require it (Qantas, Skywest) but I never interviewed with them.

Theoretically you could leave high school in year 10, pass your CPL and ATPL subjects and become an airline Pilot easily in this country.

An aviation degree is a waste of space. If you want a degree, get something useful as a back up (accounting, IT, or even law would be handy these days if you aspire to pilot councils and representing pilot groups).

GG
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 22:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,197
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
Although I got into airlines over 45 years ago with nothing more than 1500 hours, three years of high school education and a few ATPL subjects already passed, I really think times have changed.

The equipment, for a start, is less hands-on. Back then if your first airline aircraft was to be a DC3, some tailwheel time was more highly regarded than a Leaving Certificate. As long as your math was good enough to pass navigation and flight planning, and your written English good enough to describe various meteorological situations to the satisfaction of the examining board, that was about all the formal education needed.

Now, I expect that computer literacy would rate highly, although if recruiting was left up to me I would rather see a good aviation-associated technical trade qualification. An avionics LAME ticket perhaps.

But someone who can't string a sentence together in reasonably-correct English won't get through the door because first impressions DO count. And having got through the door, most substantial airlines will use something like the process of elimination I described earlier. Why? Because a) it's easy to do and b) because it's their train set, so they can.

Today, someone with the basic education that I had - i.e. three years of highschool - and someone with no willingness to self-improve via study courses, TAFE etc would probably be limited to a flying career of cattle mustering or scenic flights. They might just make some second level turbo-prop operation but even the RFDS would probably overlook someone lacking a good education - again because they can afford to be picky. Sorry to sound negative towards the OP, but if he/she did drop out of the education system too early, it needs to be said that self-improvement WILL be required to succeed, regardless of whether 'education' is really relevant to actually being able to fly an aeroplane.

Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 3rd Jul 2013 at 00:35.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 23:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To some extent I agree. However there has to be at least a few people who can get their grammar, punctuation and syntax right otherwise there'll be no SOPS and manuals worth having.
The ironic thing is how many times do you see "SOPs" written as "SOP's" in SOPs?

Last edited by VH-FTS; 2nd Jul 2013 at 23:03.
VH-FTS is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2013, 23:37
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Granite Belt, Australia
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grammar, punctuation, syntax, are going the way of dinosaurs (sadly).
Sadly so is torking proplee if TV noos reeders and reporters r yor gide.
Animalclub is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2013, 07:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Language is fluid and if modern usage dictates how language will evolve, expect no grammer and many abbreviations.

If you went back to English speakers 500 years ago, you'd probably have a hard time understanding them.
The Green Goblin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.