Psychometric Testing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Downunder
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psychometric Testing
Hi Folks. Long time reader, first time poster.
I'm after some info regarding psychometric testing, specifically for Qlink stage two. And yes, I have been through the Qlink thread.
Does anyone know of any helpful websites / books to help prepare. Also, any info or experiences with available courses would be appreciated. PMs welcome.
Cheers!
I'm after some info regarding psychometric testing, specifically for Qlink stage two. And yes, I have been through the Qlink thread.
Does anyone know of any helpful websites / books to help prepare. Also, any info or experiences with available courses would be appreciated. PMs welcome. Cheers!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide australia
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psychometric tests determine the suitability of your character for a career.
Police forces use Psychometric testing to test for empathy. If you have empathy you won't have a career in the force. Empathy is counterproductive to a satisfying career in the Police.
Psychometric testing is hard to study for. You are asked the same question in numerous different ways several times in the testing. It's hard to be consistent if you're"faking" (or misrepresenting) your answers.
As one of my pervious managers told me before my (successful test) , be honest in the test, after all if you're not suited to the role, aren't you better persuing another career?
Police forces use Psychometric testing to test for empathy. If you have empathy you won't have a career in the force. Empathy is counterproductive to a satisfying career in the Police.
Psychometric testing is hard to study for. You are asked the same question in numerous different ways several times in the testing. It's hard to be consistent if you're"faking" (or misrepresenting) your answers.
As one of my pervious managers told me before my (successful test) , be honest in the test, after all if you're not suited to the role, aren't you better persuing another career?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'gil' I guess yr advice is correct for today's environment but well before some Uni guru dreamed up the Psycho crap many a pilot applied, got thru due skill & lead a long & successful career as a commercial pilot.
Shame Co's tend to look for someone else other than a pilot within a pilot.
Flying the plane is the easy bit these days after all it's only a skill much like a trade but as for the peripheral crap?.............well it's a game of deception as I've seen a few pilots over the latter years that I scratch my head as to how they ever got thru that so called 'net' to filter out such personalities.
You don't need to be a good pilot anymore ya just gotta know how to play the game:-)
I've never had to do one of those silly tests thank God otherwise I'd still be on the ground so good luck HF55 hope ya bluff 'em!:-)
Wmk2
Shame Co's tend to look for someone else other than a pilot within a pilot.
Flying the plane is the easy bit these days after all it's only a skill much like a trade but as for the peripheral crap?.............well it's a game of deception as I've seen a few pilots over the latter years that I scratch my head as to how they ever got thru that so called 'net' to filter out such personalities.
You don't need to be a good pilot anymore ya just gotta know how to play the game:-)
I've never had to do one of those silly tests thank God otherwise I'd still be on the ground so good luck HF55 hope ya bluff 'em!:-)
Wmk2
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Downunder
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers wmk2. Hopefully I can bluff them just enough to get through!
gileraguy - I agree it is difficult to study for, particularly the motivational and personality questionnaire. Though Qlink stage two also includes Numerical and Verbal reasoning questions which I think you can definitely improve by putting in a bit of study.
gileraguy - I agree it is difficult to study for, particularly the motivational and personality questionnaire. Though Qlink stage two also includes Numerical and Verbal reasoning questions which I think you can definitely improve by putting in a bit of study.
before some Uni guru dreamed up the Psycho crap many a pilot applied, got thru due skill & lead a long & successful career as a commercial pilot.
Right up until he flew into a hill.
I think you would agree that there are some personalities that are better suited to single-pilot work and some better suited to multi-crew. In a small operation you can ill-afford that wrong person who can take down the morale of the whole base, or the whole pilot body.
The psych testing I have used was very very accurate and very descriptive of a person's character. We got all the Captains to participate in a validation study and it was very useful then as a recruitment tool, allowing us to identify the more desirable character traits in an applicant and to red-flag a very few.
The psych tests were only one tool in the selection process and an applicant with zero technical aptitude or bad referees would still get zapped. It did help avoid hiring a total charmer who turned out to be a psycho.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FG central
Age: 53
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As said above, you can't study for psychometric testing. The questions are designed in such a way that they will get an answer to what they are after by asking you several different questions that apply to the same topic. Unless you are willing (or even able) to go back and change previous answers, you won't fool the test or the reviewers of the test.
Just answer truthfully and you'll be very surprised after you've seen the results, if you are allowed to. The two psychometric tests I've done have hit my personality/beliefs/abilities right on the head...and they STILL hired me!
Management will only use it to weed out sociopaths and possibly determine your career path in the future if the test shows you may excel in a certain situation etc.
Just answer truthfully and you'll be very surprised after you've seen the results, if you are allowed to. The two psychometric tests I've done have hit my personality/beliefs/abilities right on the head...and they STILL hired me!
Management will only use it to weed out sociopaths and possibly determine your career path in the future if the test shows you may excel in a certain situation etc.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Despite the commonly held belief to the contrary, you can in fact study for and fool a psychometric test. However it does take a rather large investment in time and emotion.
Psychometric tests were designed to be used as a tool by a trained psychologist in conjunction with a face to face interview. These days, due to the stingy nature of airline recruitment departments the psychometric tests are interpreted by a computer program and the subsequent interview carried out by a HR person whom often have no real background in psychology and often simply use pro-forma type questions to tick boxes. These are the easiest tests to fool.
Fooling a psych test is like fooling a lie detector test - if you truly believe that you are telling the truth then your answers won't spike to indicated a lie. So it is with a psychometric test. You need to be the personality that the specific test is looking for and you need to carry that off for the duration of the test and any subsequent psychologist interview. You need to understand the specific psych profile down to the finest detail. It may be that you know someone who strongly exhibits this profile, you further study this profile from every source that you can find and put yourself in those shoes when giving an answer.
Seriously the psychology breadth of field that we are talking about here is not great. Broadly speaking, the tester will try to pigeon hole you in one of six or so profiles and then ask some pretty basic (canned) questions to back that up. With a bit of study you can know the intent and correct response to a psych question before the interviewer has even finished asking. The trick then is to remember to leave a thoughtful pause before responding.
Then again you can just be brutally honest. You might be surprised to find that you're exactly what they're looking for.
Psychometric tests were designed to be used as a tool by a trained psychologist in conjunction with a face to face interview. These days, due to the stingy nature of airline recruitment departments the psychometric tests are interpreted by a computer program and the subsequent interview carried out by a HR person whom often have no real background in psychology and often simply use pro-forma type questions to tick boxes. These are the easiest tests to fool.
Fooling a psych test is like fooling a lie detector test - if you truly believe that you are telling the truth then your answers won't spike to indicated a lie. So it is with a psychometric test. You need to be the personality that the specific test is looking for and you need to carry that off for the duration of the test and any subsequent psychologist interview. You need to understand the specific psych profile down to the finest detail. It may be that you know someone who strongly exhibits this profile, you further study this profile from every source that you can find and put yourself in those shoes when giving an answer.
Seriously the psychology breadth of field that we are talking about here is not great. Broadly speaking, the tester will try to pigeon hole you in one of six or so profiles and then ask some pretty basic (canned) questions to back that up. With a bit of study you can know the intent and correct response to a psych question before the interviewer has even finished asking. The trick then is to remember to leave a thoughtful pause before responding.
Then again you can just be brutally honest. You might be surprised to find that you're exactly what they're looking for.
Last edited by psycho joe; 12th Jun 2013 at 00:41.
