Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Something for the Bar Room Barristers

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Something for the Bar Room Barristers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2012, 23:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something for the Bar Room Barristers

Say a pilot works Sun , Mon , Reserve at home Tue( and not called), works Wed ,Thur, Fri Sat and is due for day off Sun.
The crewing dept of the airline call on the morning of the Sunday day off and asks if the pilot can work that day. They say that CASA allows them to change the Tue reserve to a day off on the roster retrospectively. The pilot then works that day( the second Sunday)
Is this allowed under CAO 48.1 para 1.12 ?
Greedy is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 23:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,795
Received 116 Likes on 56 Posts
No.



.. Apparently "No." is too short for PPRuNe.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 23:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But nobody has to comply with CAO 48. CAO 48 is a ‘law’ to which a ‘standard exemption’ is issued (so therefore isn’t really a law).

Symptomatic of ills in regulatory reform ….
Creampuff is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 23:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Megiddo
Age: 60
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Symptomatic of ills in regulatory reform ….
Is that similar to 'ills of society'? And what regulatory reform?
Valley of Hinnom is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2012, 00:56
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAO 48 is written into our EBA as well as Operational Documents as procedures to be observed. Does this give them legal weight?
Greedy is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2012, 01:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The EBA will almost certainly have some lawyers weasel words in it that mean that application of CAO 48 is not unequivocal. CASA have a whole spidersweb of exemptions that they issue. There would be a significant chance that your airline has some sort of exemption.

Basically, our system is that we get unworkable regulations that get made workable by CASA exemptions. If you have the energy, you could look here: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Browse/Resu...ent/CA/26/casa

The list is a bit scary. Can you image how many people in Canberra are engaged in all of this? Just because we can't make workable regulations.

The real question is, did you feel fit to fly on the Sunday? If yes, then the issue is an administrative one of whether they have cheated you out of a leave day. If the answer is no, then it might be an ombudsman / union issue.
Old Akro is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2012, 01:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that link is wrong. Its in here somewhere: Civil Aviation Safety Authority - Legislative and non-legislative instruments

They used to publish an excel spreadsheet listing them all now. I guess that was too easy to understand.
Old Akro is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.