Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

"Light" aircraft crashes near Bendigo

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

"Light" aircraft crashes near Bendigo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Oct 2012, 02:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like the fcuking dickywhackers that wanted to introduce airbags on motorbikes in the 90's?
And guess what... the latest motorcycle jackets have... airbags!

Just one example... there are many...

Armored Air Jackets Motorcycle jacket with airbag protection!

Personally I would prefer to see a little more though going in to making the "survival cell" in aircraft stronger, very few people will be prepared to wear a helmet for routine flying... this accident was a routine flight until the last few seconds.

It's hard enough getting people to wear life jackets for over-water flights...

Last edited by remoak; 30th Oct 2012 at 02:07.
remoak is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2012, 02:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I would prefer to see a little more thought going in to making the "survival cell" in aircraft stronger
Isn't the age of the fleet part of the problem? People are flying around every day in 30 and 40 year old aircraft that won't ever have improved survival cells.

I agree it's a great idea for the future but I can't see the GA fleet being turned over at a rate that's going to see the average club pilot being able to sign out a significantly safer aircraft inside the next 25 years.
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2012, 02:31
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: YSBK
Age: 35
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A new research investigation has found
that more than 40 per cent of aviation
wirestrikes that occur in Australia
were not reported to the ATSB. This
investigation commenced following
anecdotal information from stakeholders
who were aware of more wirestrikes
than had been reported.
Wirestrikes pose an on-going danger
to Australian aviators. They can happen
to any low-flying aircraft involved in any
operation, such as aerial agricultural,
other aerial work, recreational or scenic
flights. Intrigued by the possibility that
this lack of reporting was common,
the ATSB reached out to electricity
distribution companies, asking for
information. And the electricity
companies delivered.
Before this investigation, 166 wirestrikes
were reported to the ATSB between
July 2003 and June 2011. The new data
from the electricity companies, however,
revealed another 101 occurrences that
had not been reported to the ATSB. At
least 40 percent of the wirestrikes in
Australia had never been formally tallied.
‘And it’s possible that the incidence
of wirestrikes may actually be even
higher,’ said Dr Godley, the ATSB’s
Manager of Research Investigations
and Data Analysis. ‘There are several
reasons for us to believe that. Firstly,
a major telecommunications company
did not have a single repository of this
information to be able to provide the
ATSB with information of wirestrikes on
its network. In addition, not all wirestrikes
result in a broken wire or interrupted
power supply, and so are not recorded
by electricity distribution companies.
And then there’s the fact that disused
overhead wires are not tracked, so
when they are damaged by an aircraft,
electricity companies aren’t notified.
Finally, there are many private power
lines out there, and we don’t have any
figures for them.’’
‘We’re urging pilots, and all aviation
stakeholders, to report any wirestrike to
the ATSB even if there’s no damage to
the aircraft and/or no injuries. There may
not even be any damage to the wires.
But the more we know, the better we
can do our job, which is to make flying in
Australia safer.’
The report Underreporting of Aviation
Wirestrikes is available on the ATSB
website at Australian Transport Safety Bureau Homepage
Notifications of safety related events can
be made via the toll free number
1800 011 034 (available 24/7) or via the
ATSB website. 


Only a 2 months after this from ATSB
CPT733 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2012, 02:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bendigo, Australia
Age: 76
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strip location:
S36 40 33 E144 23 16

I drive past here occasionally and every time I see the windsock I go "Huh!".

You can only see the hangar from the road as the strip runs downhill, and appears shorter than it is (from the road).

Google Earth is a bit fuzzy, but further east the powerline is about 30 metres north of the treeline.

I'll have a look tomorrow when I go past.
DeRated is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2012, 08:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is what we need....
Bicycle airbag | portable bicycle helmet
Clearedtoreenter is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2012, 07:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: australia
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone have names of passengers or pilot? Thanks
Debby Nair is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2012, 22:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide australia
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheer Up

A Cirrus could still strike that wire too mate!

The age of the fleet has nothing to do with hazard minimization or identification of hazards that are not part of the aircraft...

Aren't aircraft like good wine and women, getting better with age?

Isn't the riskiest flight the one AFTER 100hrly?
gileraguy is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2012, 22:48
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand that permission to land at this field has been withdrawn until further notice by the operator until changes to the procedures have been made. It appears to be a maintenance facility.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 08:24
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gilerguy
There might be something in that. Even the newer Cessnas have air bags and much stronger seats and mountings with better head support that might increase survivability.... if they actually work. Have to admit some of those older planes with weedy seat frames, no headrests and minimal restraints do look a bit dodgy when compared to the average car these days.
Clearedtoreenter is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 13:24
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheer Up

A Cirrus could still strike that wire too mate!

The age of the fleet has nothing to do with hazard minimization or identification of hazards that are not part of the aircraft...

Aren't aircraft like good wine and women, getting better with age?

Isn't the riskiest flight the one AFTER 100hrly?
Agreed but not my point. I meant that you can make rules about airbags, aircraft retrieval parachutes etc but they can't be easily retrofitted. The aviation fleet is older than our road fleet. And even on the roads there are cars without air bags, stability systems and antilock brakes.
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2012, 01:57
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide australia
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All new cars have to be fitted with ESC by law now.

Surely the weedy seats met strength standards for their COA originally.

No matter how safe your aircraft, it's always better to stay out of the wires...
gileraguy is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2012, 07:49
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: australia
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trying again - does anyone know the names of the pilot or passengers in TKI?

Thanks
Debby Nair is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2012, 03:28
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oz Trailer
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No names appear to have been released Debbie. Perhaps you can PM "Robbo" on The Aussie Aviator site as he says he knows pilot:

http://www.****************.net/thre...e-crash.34778/

Good luck.

(edit: hmmmm seems PPRuNe dont like us mentioning the opposition - even in a link.)

TB

Last edited by TunaBum; 16th Nov 2012 at 03:31.
TunaBum is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2012, 07:09
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an idea for an inventor:

We've all seen or heard about holding a fluorescent tube underneath high voltage power lines and seeing it light up.

Could such a "free" power source (induction loops I think they are called) be used for bright _flashing_ arrays of LEDs, visible even in daylight?

Install several of these along power lines.

Cost? Maybe $150 each. Mass produced by Chinese: Maybe $40.

Intelligent power companies would simply install them at the next scheduled maintenance. LEDs routine last 10,000+ hours although I don't know if this is affected by cycling, so they could conceivably last "a lifetime" and save many more.
FokkerInYour12 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2012, 18:33
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,222
Received 123 Likes on 62 Posts
They're already out there. And they talk to you too, broadcasting on the local area frequency when an aircraft is calculated to be approaching too closely to the power lines or radio tower. The power line system uses the magnetic field surrounding the cable itself to energize the doodad.

The FAA I believe has even certified the OCAS system to enable all those 2,000' high towers to have their beacon lights off at night until a plane gets too close...

Last edited by KRviator; 16th Nov 2012 at 18:35.
KRviator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.