Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

YPJT landing opposite way on 06R today

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

YPJT landing opposite way on 06R today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2012, 09:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YPJT landing opposite way on 06R today

Not major news, but I saw a really hairy landing today at Jandakot. Either a 177 or a 210 looks like did a turn back after efato and had a wild ride back in with 30 knots or so up their butt and just made it in on 6r after a series of seriously hairy turns, somehow landing and skidding up to the keys. Certainly got our attention, anyone know what actually went down?
RR69 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2012, 11:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YES as it happens, either a 177 or a 210 did a turn back after efato and had a wild ride back in with 30 knots or so up their butt and just made it in on 6r after a series of seriously hairy turns, somehow landing and skidding up to the keys.

Chu Mai Huang is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2012, 11:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, I've never flown in Cambodia, but in Australia we're trained a little differently and what a few of us saw today was a little out of the box. If you're gonna take the piss the "what went down" comment was pretty obvious (the plane is the answer there if you didn't figure that out champ).
RR69 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2012, 12:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Not home
Age: 39
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha
thats why on the occasion i view this site... amusing
Bounceferret is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2012, 13:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hairy turns are typically reserved for the Eastern Bloc countries
FokkerInYour12 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 00:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bendigo, VIC
Age: 40
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well he is damn lucky he made it back!
Elfatness is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2012, 13:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A semi-detached 3x2
Posts: 247
Received 239 Likes on 82 Posts
well he is damn lucky he made it back!<<<<


It should be pointed out that he actually ran out of runway on the turn back, and ended up in the grass. I'm not sure if turning back and eating up 1150 m of runway can quite be regarded as damn lucky. I don't think many people teach turn backs at Jandakot, but there are not many landing options on upwind of 06L so I think he made the right decision (however, it looked to me like the a/c taxied back to the apron under its own steam, so we can query what the actual cause of the 'failure' was).
walesregent is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 02:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not far off completing my PPL @ YPJT and it was drummed into us to never attempt a turn back on engine failure after takeoff...
brettyyy is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 04:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
I'm not far off completing my PPL @ YPJT and it was drummed into us to never attempt a turn back on engine failure after takeoff...
Ask whoever's training you what the turnback decision-height is...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 04:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ask whoever's training you what the turnback decision-height is...
Good question... thanks.
brettyyy is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 04:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A semi-detached 3x2
Posts: 247
Received 239 Likes on 82 Posts
Ask whoever's training you what the turnback decision-height is...
That's a big can of worms, but considering the options on upwind 06L/06R consist mainly of trees and power lines, it may be worth opening.
walesregent is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 08:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Powerlines or not i would take 20kts g/s upwind over 80kts g/s downwind at touchdown.

Kinetic energy in this case is 16 times greater downwind.
desmotronic is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 09:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 360
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Turnback decision height is the height you judge you need to do a 180 without spinning in! My one and only engine failure was at YSBK taking off from 11C at night many years ago, at around 400 feet. All I could see were the lights of Sydney ahead and no safe dark patches. So did a 180 with stall warning going off all the time and landed safely back on 29C. Luckily no significant wind or traffic! Engine was full of black treakle which several years later was diagnosed as being due to a dodgy fuel addititive that caused a number of engine failures around Sydney.
ChrisJ800 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 04:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A semi-detached 3x2
Posts: 247
Received 239 Likes on 82 Posts
Powerlines or not i would take 20kts g/s upwind over 80kts g/s downwind at touchdown.

Kinetic energy in this case is 16 times greater downwind.
It did indeed look like a handful to put down but, like I said, the a/c was taxied back to the apron without assistance, the insurers weren't troubled and presumably all the pilots needed were new pants. I can't imagine the outcome would have been so rosy if they had landed upwind.
walesregent is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 05:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whatever the initial cockup, sounds like he/she did a good job in the end, although a little extra training in energy management, sideslip or other things may have helped with the over run.

Otherwise a good effort.

500 hours of education in one takeoff.... Some things money can't buy!
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 03:01
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can't imagine the outcome would have been so rosy if they had landed upwind.
Maybe so but could easily have been a lot worse downwind.
desmotronic is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 05:47
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For all those that think that turning back after an engine failure at T/O is a chance to be taken, have a look at this very sobering video of how easily it can kill you. There is only one or two seconds from the stall/spin to impact, hardly enough time to say "Oh shi......."

The link below will bring up a page with two video selections. Click on the left hand side snapshot of what appears to be overlooking a school quadrangle. The aircraft will rise into view from left to right.

Stall/Spin Turnback

It's a difficult choice and I hope I never have to choose, but I always remind myself as I open the throttle that up until 500' AGL an EFATO means straight ahead with limited deviations to clear major obstacles. A stall/spin has a 99.9% chance of being fatal, whereas a controlled off field landing will improve your chance of survival.
Ovation is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 06:30
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Know your aeroplane, know your options, do some practise carefully so you know how to execute your options in your aeroplane.

Know your aeroplane

Know your aeroplane.......
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 11:04
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always taught never turn back, this guy did, made it, and considering he was at right angles to the runway, half way down the runway at less than 100ft, still managed to hook it right (although that wingtip got bloody close to the ground a couple of times, bout a ft or so) and land with all that wind behind him - I'd pay serious coin to see that come off they way it did without crashing a second time - but again he made it...

The bit I also think about pre takeoff if you really think you can make it back is traffic... Had it of been a busy day with 6 in the circut, chopper's doing that weird **** choppers do over the grass, and a first solo student in a grob on short final, I reckon he would have been completely screwed. Perhaps that is another reason you are taught never turn back - could also just as easily hit a house I guess on the other hand and take out a family that way. Maybe this guy considered all of this and it helped make the decision to turn back?

I think I've just confused my self more, I'm still 50/50 on the turn back thing, particularly after seeing this, maybe...

Anyone know what happened to cause the turn back yet, particularly after the post saying he made it back on the ground under his own steam, didn't accidently switch the fuel off or something?

P.S. awaiting ridicule from the cambodian Pilot,I'm sure I've made plenty of stupid comments in this one!

Last edited by RR69; 29th Aug 2012 at 11:11.
RR69 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 12:04
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While instructing some years ago I was lucky enough to have a very experienced and senior instructor teach me a lot about turn backs. Would you do it given you had clear areas or water available? No - but most of our capital city, ga and a lot of regional airports leave you with little options.

Knowing your aircrafts performance is vital - as is knowing what you'll do and when before you take off.

It's much better going off the end at 10-20kt ground speed then through a roof or taking out power lines at 45kts. It's also a better option then trying to land on a 80m long netball court with metal poles all over it as I was first taught (at a time in my flying when landing accurately on a 1100m runway was still a challenge!!)

Both schools I taught at demonstrated the maneuver and taught handling at higher/safer altitudes.

For the poster above with the spin videos -there's many more examples of forced landings into unrealistic places being stuffed up (or having the only end outcome possible). Sometimes the "never do this" option is the best one.... Have a plan an keep all the options only.
overhere is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.