APU Use
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Queensland
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
APU Use
Hello heavy drivers, intending flying to Singapore and was just checking feedback on xxxxxx which interestingly appeared very mixed.
Reviews varied from "excellent airline" to "would never fly with them again" so I guess it can depend on what happens on the particular flight with any airline.
However one comment was relating to a hold up on the ground for about an hour and the passengers were all "sweltering". Pax queried with cabin crew who responded that cannot have air con until start up.
Am I correct in saying that this is nonesense, normally the APU provides air and if not you would have some quite distressed pax especially on a hot day.
Could someone shed light on this, any reason why the APU cannnot be left running for that time or were they saving fuel or something?
Reviews varied from "excellent airline" to "would never fly with them again" so I guess it can depend on what happens on the particular flight with any airline.
However one comment was relating to a hold up on the ground for about an hour and the passengers were all "sweltering". Pax queried with cabin crew who responded that cannot have air con until start up.
Am I correct in saying that this is nonesense, normally the APU provides air and if not you would have some quite distressed pax especially on a hot day.
Could someone shed light on this, any reason why the APU cannnot be left running for that time or were they saving fuel or something?
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes
on
10 Posts
There is no policy to leave the APU to off until engine start in the airline you mention, in fact if the temperature is above 23 degrees the air con is required to be running, and no boarding if the cabin temp 30 degrees or over. Even with an APU out, an angine would be started on the gate(if no ground air available) and cool the cabin prior to boarding.
an angine would be started on the gate(if no ground air available) and cool the cabin prior to boarding.
Yeah right - I can immediately think of a couple of major ports where you're not permitted to have an engine running at the gate
Believe it or not Fathom, there are other methods of starting other than using the APU. Many years ago MMA had a "buddy" system (air ducted from another aircraft, e.g. the F.28's as a source for other F.28's or DC-9's - that I saw), more commonly external air is available from ground equipment (carts) and at some airports air is actually available from the terminal itself (e.g. Hong Kong).
The only one of these techniques that involves starting at the bay is using fixed air, and getting a clearance to do that is inevitably quite a performance all in itself...
The only one of these techniques that involves starting at the bay is using fixed air, and getting a clearance to do that is inevitably quite a performance all in itself...
Last edited by Dora-9; 9th Aug 2012 at 06:54.
Ah yes the F28 buddy start!!
These days if the APU is stuffed you'll need to start 1 on the bay unless they can push you and all the ground support equip to a taxyway!! Not likely so start 1 on the bay it is everywhere in the World.
These days if the APU is stuffed you'll need to start 1 on the bay unless they can push you and all the ground support equip to a taxyway!! Not likely so start 1 on the bay it is everywhere in the World.
Oh, and in HKG there is no compressed air available from the bridge, only Air Con and that sometimes either won't work or is useless!!
So they drive up a truck and plug in compressed air for starting.
So they drive up a truck and plug in compressed air for starting.
Last edited by nitpicker330; 9th Aug 2012 at 07:10.
Flew out of Dallas/FW to BNE last Friday. Apparently the APU on the 747 crapped itself on the way over to the US and was not able to be repaired during the layover. Temps on the ground were over 100+oF. Before we were able to board, one of the main engines was started and run for more than an hour so the cabin could be cooled to a level where boarding could take place. As a result we were more than and hour late in departing.
Mind you, 15 hrs 6 min non-stop from Dallas/FW to BNE is a marvel of my generation!
Dr
Mind you, 15 hrs 6 min non-stop from Dallas/FW to BNE is a marvel of my generation!
Dr
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: location loaction
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forky,
Just out of curiosity, do the regs have anything to say about a U/S APU and the aircraft not being able to depart from an airport that has services that are able to fix it? Similar to FDR's etc?
Or is it just your usual MEL item for X amount of time??
Rocket
Just out of curiosity, do the regs have anything to say about a U/S APU and the aircraft not being able to depart from an airport that has services that are able to fix it? Similar to FDR's etc?
Or is it just your usual MEL item for X amount of time??
Rocket
Forky,
Just out of curiosity, do the regs have anything to say about a U/S APU and the aircraft not being able to depart from an airport that has services that are able to fix it? Similar to FDR's etc?
Or is it just your usual MEL item for X amount of time??
Rocket
Just out of curiosity, do the regs have anything to say about a U/S APU and the aircraft not being able to depart from an airport that has services that are able to fix it? Similar to FDR's etc?
Or is it just your usual MEL item for X amount of time??
Rocket
As for the 747, I wouldn't have a clue - I was in seat 54E !!!!
Dr
Last edited by ForkTailedDrKiller; 9th Aug 2012 at 09:55.
When you live....
Forky,
Just out of curiosity
Just out of curiosity
Pretty sure the FTDK wouldn't require the APU repaired during a layover - sufficient (only) cooling obtained by leaving the door open....
UTR - tounge-in-cheek
Last edited by UnderneathTheRadar; 9th Aug 2012 at 09:56.
Capt Fathom:
Thanks for this - glad to hear this situation has changed for the better. My ears still ringing from abuse for starting on the bay at Singapore in a B744. A long time ago I confess, and my last few years in an airline - also a long time ago now - were on the B777 which came with seemingly the world's most reliable APU....
Cheers!
Actually, starting at the gate not a problem these days. Times have changed.
Cheers!
Nunc est bibendum
Rocket66, the MEL for a u/s APU allows for it to be flown for 10 days prior to repair. On twins that may come with a penalty prohibiting flying beyond 60 minutes from an airfield.
Re the DFW/BNE flight........if they run an engine for an hr at they gate they would be about 3000kg short on gas. Can they do hot refueling.
Just curious being such a fuel critical sector.
Just curious being such a fuel critical sector.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Queensland
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for responses folks. I guess I shouldn't have mentioned airline concerned but I wasn't out to put them down, I haven't even flown with them.
So who knows what occurred with the APU and the air but I was just making a general query.
It appears that it would be unusual for the cabin not to be cooled or air conned with pax on board.
Not sure what the regs say but I would be surprised if an aircraft so equipped could operate without a serviceable APU.
So who knows what occurred with the APU and the air but I was just making a general query.
It appears that it would be unusual for the cabin not to be cooled or air conned with pax on board.
Not sure what the regs say but I would be surprised if an aircraft so equipped could operate without a serviceable APU.
Well then you'll have to be surprised. !!!
As Keg already has said, most Jets can have an inop APU for around 10 days.
On the A330 it can still do full 180 min ETOPS without one.
Ok
As Keg already has said, most Jets can have an inop APU for around 10 days.
On the A330 it can still do full 180 min ETOPS without one.
Ok