Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Great Barrier-bound plane catches fire?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Great Barrier-bound plane catches fire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 00:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enroute
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great Barrier-bound plane catches fire?

Anyone know any details, apparently it occured today??
Capnmakka is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 02:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,445
Received 228 Likes on 78 Posts
brake binding on taxi, returned to stand, pax offloaded, pilot tried to put brake fire out but it kept re-igniting due to the heat. Fire service called and brake cooled using dry powder. That about sums it up.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 04:05
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enroute
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha so pretty minor then? News article made it sounds rather drastic. Bloody media.
Capnmakka is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 04:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Haha so pretty minor then? News article made it sounds rather drastic. Bloody media.
Folks,
Twice I have seen aircraft burnt out as a result of brake fires (including a B747), it can be a seriously big deal. A dragging brake on an individual wheel can be a particularly insidious problem, it make be very hard for the crew to know they even have a problem, as brake temperature sensing/indicating on individual wheels, and any cockpit warning, is usually found on more recent large aircraft.
Capnmakka, what are you a Captain of, a harbour barge, you certainly don't know much about aviation.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 06:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what was the air craft type?
Ejector is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 06:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Age: 35
Posts: 242
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
It was a Trislander.
NZFlyingKiwi is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 07:00
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enroute
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hahaha ok mate calm down! What I meant was in this particular instance it was pretty minor and the news media in intial reports blew it out of proportion with incorrect facts, as usual.
Luckily the barges I drive don't have brakes that bind and catch fire.
Capnmakka is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 09:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fire service called and brake cooled using dry powder.
Ha ha no I don't think so, the cooling effect of dry powder is approximately zero. It does put the fire out though. But then you have to spend a few hours cleaning all the powder out of the brakes...
remoak is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 10:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly is a strange one. The photo shows both tyres still inflated so it is difficult to see what was feeding the 'fire'.

All the Trislanders I have flown or maintained had a standard Cleveland 3 puck unit running on Fluid 41 (5606).

I have seen a Trislander shear a brake caliper bolt before and the whole caliper rotated over and fouled the disk. I think there is a possibility of more damage if the other bolt had gone.
With 3 engines running and taxiing downwind these things can require some braking...
A fire with flames etc would be very rare and it got a hold in the tyres and magnesium alloy wheels then it could get away. Apart from that it could possibly be a brake fluid fire.

No doubt we will see more when details filter through.
baron_beeza is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 12:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Trislander!!! What did they put it out for!!

Last edited by thorn bird; 2nd Jun 2012 at 12:06.
thorn bird is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 13:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Read the thread header and thought.."why didn't they just leave there gear down"....
Dooh....
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 22:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: new zealand
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better photo here: Passengers flee Great Barrier plane fire - National - NZ Herald News (or at least more of an action shot).

Article is mostly rubbish but can be interpreted with some thinking and the 'Great Barrier Mishaps' summary is inaccurate at best.

Noting also that that doesn't look like dry powder the firey is spraying onto the wheels.

Last edited by scroogee; 2nd Jun 2012 at 22:39.
scroogee is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 22:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cairns
Age: 50
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Trislander!!! What did they put it out for!!
Only a person who has not flown the Trislander would say that..........
Josh Cox is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 02:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only a person who has not flown the Trislander would say that..........

I reckon.

I have had the pleasure to work on and fly these in many places about the world.

Certainly a great machine for the operation... it fills a gap in the market that not many other aircraft types can.

On the other hand.... I can certainly understand a passenger thinking there may be too many of them about still. They don't score too many points in the looks, noise and comfort categories..

She's a hard road finding the perfect woman, boy.
baron_beeza is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 02:36
  #15 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by "baron_beeza
They don't score too many points in the looks, noise and comfort categories..
Do they score any?
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 08:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Brisbane
Age: 40
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from that photo, looks like it could have been pretty serious indeed. Very lucky.
Blackhander wannabe is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2012, 22:10
  #17 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,581
Received 438 Likes on 231 Posts
Civil Aviation Authority spokeswoman Emma Peel said the authority would review the report before deciding if further action was needed.
Wondered where she'd got to these days....

ShyTorque is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2012, 01:20
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am surprised to read the pilot is copping the blame at this stage.
At least we cannot blame the reporting for that.
I feel the tone of the reporting is much better this time... and I know there is a reason for that..

Thanks Bryce...


I cannot imagine tapping the brakes twice to be normal procedure.
I have seen something similar at Kalgoorlie many years ago but the system had been contaminated by brake fluid on that occasion. The affected seals in the park, or shuttle valve had allowed the brake to jam on.

The Auckland incident is an engineering problem.
Ok, the pilot should never have taxied with the issue either but was tapping on a brake the cure, - really..

What management would expect the Pilot to shut down three engines, climb out the co-pilot's door and then knock the brake... all in full view of the passengers.

Perhaps I am being harsh.
Did they mean the pilot could tap on the brake pedal twice to free the brake.
Hardly a fix but if it was that easy why would a pilot contemplate taxiing against a binding brake.

Difficult to comprehend either way. Certainly an avoidable incident and questions should be asked.

It makes me wonder how the LAME cleared the initial defect, - if indeed it was ever written up.
baron_beeza is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2012, 10:35
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi WindNZ, yep I have to agree with all of your post, based on what has been reported sofar at least.

The aircraft is on Air Transport though and is just not a 'normal' GA operation.

I did a factory liaison visit and then a Trislander rating course at Aurigny many years back. They had a large fleet of Trislanders at the time and operated them very much as you would expect a small airline operation.
I can't for the life of me recall the brake system but it did not normally give any problems. It would not be too much different to the Islander installation.
Perhaps we should mention here that it is not normal practice to leave any aircraft parked with the brakes applied.

GBA have attracted a bit of adverse publicity admittedly, - it is a shame as generally a well set-up Trislander should go pretty well.

At least the newspaper reporting seemed more balanced.
baron_beeza is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.