Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

ANR sends you deaf?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2012, 22:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: new zealand
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANR sends you deaf?

I love my Bose but a bloke was saying ANR will send you deaf?, any thoughts or facts.
Did the usual research on the net and still yes/no really, your wonderful responses will be waited upon........
He said the RAAF has got rid of them for that reason?
norwester33 is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 23:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 44
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard the same thing. Something to do with active noise canceling that it uses a higher pitch frequency to block out the ambient noise. This in turn slowly sends you deaf first in the higher range. Passive noise canceling on the other hand uses normal ear plugs and no batteries required much like the clarity aloft headsets.

That's just my basic understanding. I could be completely wrong however.
Altimeters is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 23:31
  #3 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jee, I thought it was basic physics how it worked, ANR just uses phase cancellation. I think the argument revolves around whether the sound wave is still present when it's been cancelled, which is nonsense...
 
Old 17th May 2012, 23:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You would need to consider the amount of time you spend flying to determine if you are likely to be affected either way.

2 hours a weekend versus 8 hours a day...

I find standard soft earplugs work well under almost any headset.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 00:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What ever the answer, it is not much fun suffering industrial noise deafness; trust me.
alidad is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 01:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure where that nonsense comes from, but I have heard others spread it too. The only way to actively cancel out noise is to cancel out the sound waves, thus reducing the pressure of them.

Active noise control - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
baswell is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 04:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: oz
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What The!

The government probably instructed the RAAF to issue ear plugs cause they are cheaper than a Bose or LightSpeed Zulu?????

Now in all seriousness, I have been using ANR headsets since 1997. I use to be fatigued after instructing for about 6 hours in a C152. Once I started on ANR there is no way I could go back. Trust me after my headsets went in for a service it was terrible to use non ANR. All up, my hearing from Tests is in the excellent range and there is no evidence of deteriation, even with me being in my very early forties.

Last edited by laser650; 18th May 2012 at 04:15.
laser650 is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 07:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under a wing
Age: 61
Posts: 728
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am a recent convert to anr.
I am far less fatigued after an 8-9 hour day than I used to be with a passive helmet.

I had concerns as some above have had, but no longer.
185skywagon is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 08:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by altimiters
Something to do with active noise canceling that it uses a higher pitch frequency to block out the ambient noise. This in turn slowly sends you deaf first in the higher range.
That ain't the way ANR works. It does not mask the noise, nor is it just merely causing the noise to not be perceived. It physically makes the noise (mostly) cease to exist within the protected area. And it certainly doesn't do it by using a higher frequency. The entire process is dependent on using the identical frequency as the noise to be eliminated.
A Squared is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 09:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've tried both the earplugs under the headset trick and ANR.
ANR is much better, on all fronts.
Less fatigue, less noise and radio is lower volume.

The earplug trick is great if you have a standard old headset, downside is if your flying with anyone using ANR they will get annoyed when you keep turning the radio up to hear the thing properly.
NIK320 is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 12:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mars
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANR sends you deaf??? What, you mean you are better off without it?

Well, I've sure met many older pilots with significant hearing loss, who never used ANR.

It's pretty certain if you fly and don't do something to protect your hearing, you'll go deaf.
Clearedtoreenter is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 12:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tjuntjuntjarra
Age: 54
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got an ANR helmet a couple of years back and would not go back to the old one with no ANR, but I still find I need earplugs in addition to the ANR, its just so much more comfortable when it is nice and quiet. Its just too noisy with the airvents all open.
aileron_69 is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 15:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
ANR send you deaf?

You missed April Fool's day by a month and a half.

Let's see some proof before you start trying to sell that whopper.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 18:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,076
Received 151 Likes on 66 Posts
I had similar concerns but could never get the bottom of it. i asked a audioligist once and they didn't know but couldnt see how it was harmful. My understanding is that ANR sends a counter soundwave cancelling the incoming sound. Does this actually increase the pressure on your eardrums though?
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 19:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
No. The mechanism is destructive interference (and not destructive to the eardrum). The undesired frequencies (ie. Non vocal) are sampled by a small microphone within the ear cup and a wave of completely opposite amplitude is broadcast to cancel the original signal out. The net result is NO sound at the attenuated frequency (theoretically). How can that possibly affect your hearing? It can't.

The only ANR that might possibly be harmful are those fitted ear plugs (which are, by the way, almost weightless and work very well) that could allow bacteria and moisture to build up withon the ear canal.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 19:34
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does this actually increase the pressure on your eardrums though?

No. It *reduces* the pressure on your ear drum. That's why it's quieter. Fewer, smaller, weaker sound waves reach your eardrum. It's really *is* that simple.
A Squared is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 23:24
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
MAYBE someone was singing praises for ANR, and said something like "Now that I use ANR Headseats, I can hardly hear the engine..."
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 19th May 2012, 02:45
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FG central
Age: 53
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used a set of ANR/ bluetooth ear defenders in ground handling. They were the only way to eliminate that 98Db whistle from the super noisy APU on a 737.
And I could receive calls and talk to the boss whilst continuing to do my work. They even have ear defenders capable of being used with two way radios.
I don't know why this sort of technology isn't used far more commonly.
Typhoon650 is offline  
Old 19th May 2012, 21:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
Probably because employers don't want to pay for the expense of this kit.

"What jasay Fella? Better Dead Bets? A 'n R? I don't know that band. What? I can't hear ya? Pay money for fancy headsets - Fook Off !!"
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 19th May 2012, 23:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I use earplugs under my ANR. Does wonders for me and I feel much less fatigued after long flights. It kinda stops pounding of sound into your ear arena and the side of your head versus straight into the ear if that makes sense. I find that it increases the quality of the audio, making it softer in terms of treble an makes it easier to comprehend radio calls.

But you are right, the volume does need to be much louder which might upset others.
VH-XXX is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.