Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

NZ Instrument rating renewal questions

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

NZ Instrument rating renewal questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Mar 2012, 13:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: new zealand
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZ Instrument rating renewal questions

I had completed a NZ CAA MECIR back in 2004 and have not used the instrument rating sense. Does this mean I would have to do another MECIR flight test and IFR law exam to regain my rating?

Thanks
Jkeg
jkeg is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2012, 20:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I'm aware there is nothing in the rules stating that you need to resit an IFR law exam or do a flight test. You just need to get up to scratch to do an IFR renewal flight.

Although obviously it would be wise to read up on the IFR law stuff before this as you will be questioned on it and if its been a while then a lot may have changed.

Have a read of CAA part 61 it's all in there anyway.

Hope this helps.
mcrowe is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2012, 22:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Smog Central
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFR renewal, but like an initial issue from memory
notaplanegeek is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2012, 06:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Age: 35
Posts: 241
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Yes, basically it's a renewal, not a true flight test, but because you're pretty uncurrent you can expect that the examiner would essentially treat it as if it was an initial issue flight test.
NZFlyingKiwi is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2012, 09:32
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: new zealand
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok Thanks guys for the info.

still not 100% on the IFR law may need to give CAA a call reguarding this one
as I know there is an expairy of 5 years but I think this only if you are still to do an initial issue IFR flight test.
jkeg is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2012, 10:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a renewal should do it.
i have had my head in part 61 myself at the moment, hope someone here can give me a pointer in the right direction.

I got my IFR on a glass cockpit, do i need to "convert" to a steam driven cockpit? or is tea the step up and analogue is a given? i can't seem to find it anywhere, in-fact the only place TEA is mentioned is in the AC. there is no mention of TEA in the part.

thanks
Dynamite9585 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2012, 11:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5-year law expiry only applies to licenses. Ratings are held for a lifetime, therefore no law exam must be sat for the expired IR. (But comments above about what the examiner might ask are spot on.) Refer rule 61.37, recent flight experience.

There is only ever one initial issue IR test. However, annual competency checks are separate for TEA and non-TEA aircraft. If you haven't done a competency check in a round-dial aircraft within the past 12 months, you must do one prior to IFR flight in the said aircraft. Refer AC61_17, page 6.

A money-saving note however: approach aid endorsements are not specific to TEA or to non-TEA. Therefore, if you're current on all the approach aids you care about, you need only do the bare minimum IR renewal flight in the round-dial aircraft. You don't have to repeat all the different approaches again!
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2012, 11:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks Oktas.
I managed to track that down after i wrote the question.
looks like i'm up for a bit of a wallet reduction to do that, as i would also have to type rate
Dynamite9585 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.