Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Mental maths - tips, tricks and shortcuts

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Mental maths - tips, tricks and shortcuts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Dec 2011, 22:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the water
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Mental maths - tips, tricks and shortcuts

I thought I'd start a little thread that will hopefully be of some benefit to newbies and "old hats" alike.

Maths is something we use on a daily basis as pilots and the more time you can spend looking out the window as opposed to scribbling on a piece of paper, punching numbers in to calculator or wizzing around your wizz wheel.

Be it simple 1-60's, a quick and dirty method of working out drift angles for an instrument approach or converting speeds, weight, units of measurement quickly.
WannaBeBiggles is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2011, 22:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Percentages can be good for quick mental comparison between choices, or straight calculations.

For example:
Planned groundspeed 130 kt.
Say time for one leg of a nav is 33 minutes, do groundspeed check from two pinpoints and actually getting 115 kt.
That's 15 kts slower than planned, close enough to 10% of planned g/s, so leg will take about 10% longer, or 3.3 min, so you can easily revise ETA and fuel burn.

It's not perfectly accurate, but can give you good estimates which you can refine when you get time.
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2011, 22:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The first thing I would recommend student pilots do is learn to mentally convert minutes to decimals ie (6 min = 0.1 hr etc). Some cadets I fly with have not seen the practicality of this in an age of an app for everything.
Greedy is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2011, 23:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Learn how to manipulate numbers and groups of numbers in your head.

For example 85 USG of fuel, how many L and KG?

Start with 85 x4 so that is 170 plus another 170 which is 340. Now we all know that it's about 3.778 not 4 so that is less 5% roughly. So that is less 10%/2 or 34/2 which is 17. Answer is 323 litres. Now doing it accurately it works out at 321.76, so in flight doing a mental check is 323 close enough?

Now we want kg, well 0.71 kg to the litre, ahhh near enough to 30% less and we had 323, but let's allow a tad mor so use 330 to account for the bit more than 0.70 vs 0.71 and we get 10% of 330 being 33, so three of them is 99 and that means 231kg. Or from 323 it would be 226kg.

Now doing it accurately I get 228.45kg, so how close is 231 or 226kg.

So the secret is knowing the formulae or conversion constants, and then just being good at manipulating the numbers in easy chunks. Knowing what to add or subtract and doing so.

I am blessed with good mental maths and the ability to also know what is near enough and what is wrong. Too many kids today can't do this and they have no clue if hey come up with a wrong number. That is the scary bit.

Mental maths is great, but it must be matched with knowing what looks right and wrong.

I hope that helps answer your question. As for the useful tricks like descent profiles such as distance times 3 (in hundreds feet) add 100 etc is something others here will have good tricks for.

Chimbu Chuck is a classic one for them.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2011, 23:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Minutes to decimals .6 - I've never had a reason to use this except for sometimes when I have to pay for the aircraft after the flight.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 02:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 日本
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one I use a lot is the 'clock face' for approximating crosswinds, drift angles etc:

The clock obviously has 60 minutes and you use the proportion of those minutes to estimate the % of the crosswind etc. I know, crap explanation So, I'll try harder. The wind is 30 degs off the runway at 20 knots. Take those 30 degs and pretend they're minutes on our clock face. 30 minutes is 1/2 (50%) of the face, so the crosswind component is about 10 knots. Another: wind is 20 degrees off the runway at 15 kts. 20 degs = 20 minutes = 1/3 of the clock face, therefore 1/3 of 15; crosswind is 5 kts. This works all the way up to around 40-45 degs; thereafter just take the whole lot. So a wind 50 degs off the runway at 10 kts will be 10 kts of crosswind.

Add in a 'max drift' calc and we can sort out all our nav problems. Max drift is the wind speed divided by our TAS in miles/min(or IAS if you're low down......these are approximates, not absolutes ) SO; we're in our Cessna and we're bimbling along at 120 kts. 120 kts/60 = 2 miles/min. We've got a wind speed of 30 kts at our cruising level, so max drift (i.e. if it was all across) would be 15 degs. Now we apply our clock face: wind is 15 degs off our track. 15 degs = 15 minutes = 1/4 of the clock. Max drift is 15 degs (piss poor example eh), so our drift angle is 4ish degs (1/4 of 15), so head 4 degs into wind. Another, I hear you cry: TAS 180 (3 miles/min). Wind is 60 kts, therefore max drift is 60/3 = 20 degs. Wind is 40 degs off our track. 40 degs = 40 mins = 2/3 of the clock. 2/3 of 20......14 degs of drift.

We can also take that angle off our track of the wind, subtract it from 90 and apply the same calcs to work out our groundspeed. E.g: we've got 20 kts of wind at 60 degs off our nose. 90-60 = 30. 30 on the clock face = 1/2; so we've got 10 kts of headwind. Wind 30 degs off track at 10 kts: 90-30 = 60; therefore take the whole lot: we've got 10 kts headwind. Apply logically for tailwind.

Applying it all: wind is 330/20 at cruise and we're going to track 360 in our 120kt TAS Cessna. So, max drift is 10 degs (120/60 = 2 nms/min. 20/2 = 10). wind is 30 degs off track so hdg reqd is 355 (30 = 1/2 the clock. 1/2 of 10 = 5 degs.....apply in the correct sense!). Groundspeed is 100 kts (90-30 = 60. Apply the whole lot 'cos it's greater than 75% of the clock face, therefore, we've got 20 kts headwind). We land on our conveniently orientated runway 36 and the wind is now 320 at 15. We've got a 10 kts crosswind from the left (40 degs off = 2/3 of the clock = 2/3 of 15).

I haven't got a whizzwheel to hand but would be interested to hear how close they are. Now, back to the FMC
Fratemate is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 03:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Another good tip is to
STOP USING FRGGIN' CALCULATORS IN FLIGHT!

It takes your attention away from the aircraft attitude while you concentrate on using tiny buttons and a miniscule display.

My students soon learn if a calculator comes out in flight it soon ends up in the baggage area behind the back seat.

The more you practise "mental gymnastics" the easier it gets.

Learn to use your whiz wheel (not just for time vs distance/fuel, but for multiplication and division as well). The dude who invented this thing was a certifiable genius!

Round numbers to make rough calcultions easier,
Eg. 4 miles off in 38 would be pretty close to 4:40, hence 6:60 or 6 degrees.

For cross and headwinds, I used
30 deg = 1/2 wind strength is x/wind
45 deg = 3/4 and
60 deg = 90%

Reverse the order for head/tail winds

30 deg = 90% head/tail wind
45 deg = 3/4 and
60 deg = 1/2.

At 60kts, 1 kt x/w = 1 deg drift
At 120 kts = 1/2 deg drift.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 04:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A good tip I was shown (after 20 years of flying) : A persons finger on a WAC chart covers near enough to 10 nm. Try it. 2 fingers 20nm 4 fingers 40nm etc You'll quickly work out for your own hand where it has to cross the track drawn on the chart to be surprisingly accurate.Very handy on a rough day bouncing around with no auto pilot.Wish I had been shown this for my pre GPS days. I still use for identifying items of interest that we see out the window from time to time.
Cheers RA
rutan around is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 09:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,293
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Stuff the mental maths!

Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 10:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But when MIHC chucks your calculator or whizz wheel (same thing really) into the back seat, maybe you might want to unstuff the brain maths.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 10:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,293
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
That's why I carry two of them!

Doesn't anyone have a sense of humor anymore?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 10:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Never at home
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To nail a 3 degree glideslope, use RoD of 5 x groundspeed! (Because a 3 degree slope is a 5% gradient). Simple, but effective.
BoxBoxCheez is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 11:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
No, I don't mind a whiz wheel, really. You can hold it up, operate it with one hand and keep an eye on what's going on outside at the same time.
(Most students let go of the yoke (haven't quite worked out rudder to keep wings level yet, but that doesn't matter cause they're looking down anyhoo) and concentrate fully on a little half by 3 cm screen for the next two minutes.)

Mental maths first, double check with the whiz wheel.

Plus, no batteries to go flat.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 12:43
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 145
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A good tip I was shown (after 20 years of flying) : A persons finger on a WAC chart covers near enough to 10 nm. Try it. 2 fingers 20nm 4 fingers 40nm etc You'll quickly work out for your own hand where it has to cross the track drawn on the chart to be surprisingly accurate.Very handy on a rough day bouncing around with no auto pilot.Wish I had been shown this for my pre GPS days. I still use for identifying items of interest that we see out the window from time to time.
Cheers RA
My instructor taught me this before Nav 1
JustJoinedToSearch is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 13:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Top of descent for a 500ft/min descent.
Thousands of feet to loose x twice the GS in nm/min.

Descent from 9000 to 3000 at 180kts.
dropping 6000ft and covering 3nm per minute so 6 x 6 = 36nm.

To prove it works.
36nm @ 3nm/min = 12 mins.
12 mins x 500ft/min = 6000ft.

4000ft at 120kts = 4 x 4 = 16nm
16nm @ 2nm/min = 8 mins
8 mins x 500 ft/min = 4000ft.

GS is a multiple of 2 so easy enough to use either 120kts, 150kts or 180kts.
+/- 10kts, adjust by 3nm as appropriate.
NIK320 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 14:19
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Cool

RTFQ = 1/2TFA

Works for me

You must have a ball park figure at all times as man's index finger on the keyboard causes more strife than the middle one used to do.

greybeard is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 14:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Zoo
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fratemate's clock code works well.

Rather than dividing and multiplying all over the place having one simple number to remember. I use 0.284 to get litres of Jet per side... ie I need 500 lbs of fuel x 0.284 = 145 litres a side.

Time on target can be useful as well... 10 seconds late requires a 10 knot increase for (normal cruise speed) seconds (so if normal cruise speed was 240kts, and you were 10 seconds late, you need to do 250kts for 4 minutes to make up the lost time).

Remembering 3x height for profile can be rather hand for night circling as well, not just 60nm out.
kalavo is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 20:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Quick numbers checks using what some have mentioned here are fine under certain conditions but it would be very irresponsible of any pilot not to have a calculator at hand at all times. Under pressure or duress the brain can be very unreliable & simply wrong so always have two options for working out any calculations. Why else do we have such high levels of automation these days even in basic A/C, 'cause it takes the 'guess' work out of a lot of flying & that includes number crunching using the brain only.End result safer!
When I was taught to drive a plane everything revolved around a whiz wheel as well as being able to do simple maths in yr head but a calculator was always there close at hand.

Simply being alert at all times & having good situational awareness means brain number crunching is kept to a minimum.

Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 21:12
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South of the North Pole
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is an easy one. How many feet before leveling off from a climb or descent is required for attaining your target altitude. 10% of ROC eg climbing at 1000fpm you'd need to start leveling off 100' prior to target altitude.

The other one is at what point you require to start your turn onto an DME arc. 1% of GS eg 200kts x 1%=2nm (rate 1 turn)

Knox.
knox is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2011, 23:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
Reciprocal headings, add 200 minus 20 or vise versa or add 2 minus 2 to keep it simple.

150 add 200 = 350 minus 20 = 330
300 minus 200 = 100 plus 20 = 120
Kelly Slater is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.