Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

CASA proposing flight test requirement for ATPL issue.

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

CASA proposing flight test requirement for ATPL issue.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2011, 02:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All very interesting! But does anyone know when this proposed change is to become effective?
Also, I don't think it is a bad idea upping the requirements to ICAO and NZ comparable standards. Afterall how much worth is an ATPL where half of this flight time can come from gliders, ultralights, etc.
Although I do say this now after receiving my ATPL.
saseahawk is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2011, 03:14
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A licence with a REQUIREMENT for a couple of hundred gliding hours would be an improvement!
ATPL [and SCPL before that] for over 25 years.

Licence test as part of command IR test sounds reasonable.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2011, 05:16
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But does anyone know when this proposed change is to become effective?
This is the most accurate and succinct answer you will ever read:





No.
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2011, 05:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, unfortunately. I've heard this proposition for the first time several years ago. Just like they were discussing to change the flight planning and performance subject aircraft to a more modern aircraft than the 717.
saseahawk is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2011, 09:21
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...can't imagine there is anyone..current...capable or...believeable...in CASA that could do the assessment..
cficare is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2011, 20:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the water
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
True, unfortunately. I've heard this proposition for the first time several years ago. Just like they were discussing to change the flight planning and performance subject aircraft to a more modern aircraft than the 717.
At least the 717 would give you a type that still flies in Australia...the 727 on the other hand

I don't see a real issue with this, as long as they still accept my ATPL passes and don't make me do them again!
WannaBeBiggles is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2011, 22:46
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the 727 it shall be. Interesting. Good point you made.
They will have to accept them. It wouldn't be fair otherwise.
saseahawk is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2011, 01:35
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seagull mark IV?
Tankengine is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2011, 10:32
  #29 (permalink)  
SW3
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LeadSlead why would we be talking about private ops on the subject of an ATPL above 5700kg where I've been explicitly on the subject of commercial ops. If you want to fly your KingAir 350 privately without an ATPL fill your boots, talking about RPT here. Give the knit picking a break!
SW3 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2011, 11:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tankengine,
Seagull Mk IV, that brings back memories, ATPL Flt Planning exam in the early 80s.
Based on the old B707 we were told.
aussie027 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2011, 02:59
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
have to wait for your command on a >5700kg multi crew aircraft
as they are not above 5700kg
only privilege an ATPL offers over a CPL is the ability to command RPT services
ATPL is the requirement for command >5700kg,
ATPL required for above 5700 RPT OR CHARTER ops except if aircraft is single pilot
With respect, when was the last time some of you guys actually read the CAR with respect to CPL and ATPL priveleges and limiations?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2012, 20:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 49
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the aspiring corporate captains who have overseas type rating providers?

let me guess, there will be an hourly rate charged.....
as fragged is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2012, 09:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: southern hemisphere
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its been a while since this thread was active just wondering if anyone has any updates as to when the CASA atpl Flight Test is coming into effect? lots of rumors around but nobody really knows. I've emailed CASA about it to get their verdict, but have been waiting a while now
mar1234 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2012, 10:16
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: All over
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back in 2009 there was something on the CASA website about changing CASR Part 61 to include the need for a flight test. I e-mailed a guy in the licencing department and he was cagey about when it would be brought in, but suggested that it might be some time in 2010 So it's anyone's guess.
StoffelNZ is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2012, 14:54
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 145
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Have we fully transferred over to CASR 1998 yet?

There's your answer.
JustJoinedToSearch is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2012, 20:52
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: on the beach :-)
Age: 50
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

employee a few consultant mates or keep a few of the crusty old cts employed a little longer by throwing the thought around! Hell, the formation of a working group is likely and a couple of trips to Montreal or the USA is definitely on the cards, especially for all the pensioners running the joint. Oh the taxpayer kitty is so deep, decisions decisions, which bucket of money do we raid this time, which unnecessary trip abroad to go on this time, more troughs please, quickly quickly our snouts are dry, quick quick more troughs!!

And speaking of troughs, rumour has it that 15 of them attended the recent safe skies seminar (safe skies should be used loosely) in Canberra, most stayed at the luxurious $650 starting price per night Hyatt Canberra (Presidential suite spooning perhaps) and the cost of their sojourn was huge!
Do they feel guilt?
weloveseaplanes is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 08:57
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 36
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe i've missed this, but is there still a prerequisite to have a pass in the 7 ATPL exams based on B727 and B767 for an aircraft which I imagine will not be used to conduct this flight test? could it be a good idea to adopt a similar process with regard to the written portion and look into the FAA system a bit more?
expert_beginner is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2012, 06:48
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if this proposed new ATPL licence system include the current situation where a CPL paying for his own A320 type rating (being his first jet) will still be given a command endorsement on type, even though his simulator training is in the copilot's seat?
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2012, 07:43
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
could it be a good idea to adopt a similar process with regard to the written portion and look into the FAA system a bit more?
Wash your mouth out! Don't you know that mentioning anything the FAA does is heresy! You'll be burnt at the stake for that.
PLovett is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2012, 10:21
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tee emm,

When you do an A320 type rating, you spend equal time in either seat.

You then receive a command rating.
4SPOOLED is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.