Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Norfolk Island Ditching ATSB Report - ?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Norfolk Island Ditching ATSB Report - ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2011, 20:34
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
From what I understand, at the time AWK ops, and for that matter Charter, were not required to carry an alternate for Norfolk! WX/Notams notwithstanding of course. Hello CASA, was anyone home! Now from a command point of view, I'd be extremely cautious about embarking on such a flight without at least another option up my sleeve. I'm assuming of course that the captain had calculated his relevant PNRs/CPs.

That brings us to the question, at what point did the crew learn the Wx at norfolk required an alternate, and was this information passed to them in time to take a different course of action?
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2011, 22:08
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's a fair question to ask krusty, and from distant memory when myself and a couple of others reviewed times distances and the weather being passed to the pilots, they could have made New Cal.

Probaly a good reason they did not want to!
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2012, 16:37
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ignore - Deny - Deny - Till the issue fades away

CASA Style
Ejector is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2012, 20:59
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jingles old mate that is SOPs for the regulator and bureau these days...the word in bold says it all I'm afraid:
A ditching, Air-work category, jet, night time, in the ocean!
Unless you have big pockets or a roo on your tail, nothing of consequence in other words, then noone gives a rat's rear end!

Gobbles sums it up perfectly:

A tough regulator is not afraid to take the big boys on, head on, and not willing to allow its testicles to be squeezed by the Minister, Board and other lines of protection. This is your starting point to achieve a higher standard of safety in the industry. Every time one of the 'big guys' f*cks up CASA should be throwing a rope around the accountable persons neck in that airline and punish them in accordance with the civil aviation act. You only have to do it once and the indsutry CEO/COO rogues will quickly take their money and run for safer grounds. Until that starts to happen there will be absolutely no improvement in safety or minimisation of risk. It's time for CASA to stop playing hand puppets with farmhand chopper pilots and chasing operators who forget to tuck in their uniforms while on duty, it is time to asctually oversight safety.
Sarcs is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 00:52
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Justice seeker rule 101 from the "bureaucratese" Ops manual, "if in doubt circle the wagons and prepare for a long seige and....."



..do not resurface until the coast is clear!"
Sarcs is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 03:41
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hiding in Plane Sight
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was not Airwork (ie air ambulance), was a Charter of aircraft and crew from Pelair by Careflight.
Al Fentanyl is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 08:27
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 1,681
Received 43 Likes on 28 Posts
Nowhere to go....

On long oceanic legs any pilot that had no alternate or is not fazed by the wx either,.. imho ...has steel balls and can land anything anywhere...or just a lead brain. PVT, CHTR, AWK...does it matter.

The guy that should get THE medal was the one who used his initiative and had a look from some high ground and spotted a faint light....as rough indicator as where to go with the boat.
Had that not occured..or the view been obscured by rain, it would be another AE type mystery...where DID they end up, apart from in the water. How about that for a 'miracle'?

Well I supose you could say he could land anything, anywhere....except it just was not the desired destination.
Scary.
aroa is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 12:31
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tasmania and High Wollemi
Posts: 439
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What did the client specify??

Jinglie, believe Al is correct. The client specified their flights to be operated to charter standard together with a whole bunch of other requirements.

ATSB report is due shortly I am told.

catseye is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 12:39
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hiding in Plane Sight
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jinglie, in order for it to be Airwork Category, ie an Air Ambulance operation, the patient or patients representatives must have contracted with Pelair to provide that aeromedical service. As I understand it, they did not. The clinical coordination was done through Careflight who accepted the case and chartered an aircraft and crew from Pelair as they did regularly. So for Pelair, it was a Charter.

If you have different info, would be glad to hear it.

Regardless of that though, to launch on that flight with air in the tanks and the load capacity to take more weight in fuel cannot be a wise decision.

Aroa is dead right about the only hero in the whole sorry saga - give that man a medal!
Al Fentanyl is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 13:29
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hiding in Plane Sight
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You may be right - or not. I will await with interest the outcome of the report.... if I haven't died of old age by the time it comes out.
Al Fentanyl is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2012, 13:35
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
What if that Air Ambulance flight is also carrying a passenger (i.e. not a patient or flight crew or medical staff)?
Checkboard is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2012, 04:38
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: on the edge
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it legal - PEL-Air? Was it legal CASA?......
Was what Legal? Do you have evidence that something was not (legal)?
blackhand is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2012, 07:51
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think it matters none what Cat this flight was conducted under (Air Work according to the report so far) it's still an A/C carrying people but the one underlying problem here is that less than max fuel was carried to an remote Is at night where the Wx was or could have been sus (as it turned obviously was very sus) in a light twin,that's the part that needs to be hammered home,simply be smart about the operation from a safety stand point not from a commercial stand point.
They where damned lucky it was a West Wind Jet you couldn't pick a better airframe to ditch with, engines up out of the way,fair amount of fuse blw the wings making it like a canoe with large outriggers!
Doesn't matter what the report says or will say eventually does anybody ever learn from the mistakes of others in aviation?....rarely!



Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2012, 04:03
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: More than 300km from SY, Australia
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Changes after the Event

I hope it won't result in an in-effective report like the Darwin Brasilia, where "....the Company involved has now gone to simulator training....so this won't happen again..."

Sorry - my paraphrasing of the report that came out sans any SR's [safety recommendations] by ATSB.

Anyway, casa never take any notice of them anyway.

We will see - ATSB you are on notice.
Up-into-the-air is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2012, 05:25
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Age: 61
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The report should be released next thursday. It has been a long time coming. We will see if the lion share of blame is laid at the feet of the regulator, the operator or the pilot.

Jinglie may be close to the mark about a circus.
john62 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 00:51
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes shall be very interesting to see. Surely Operator and Pilot won't be left unscathed.

We got lucky this time with no loss of life, so lets hope lessons will be learned.
adsyj is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 11:58
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,292
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
The captain is always to blame. Do you have anything else to speculate on before the official report?
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 13:28
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Age: 61
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have heard, most of the blame is directed at the crew. There are only minor criticisms of the operator and regulator.

Cookies must be enabled | Herald Sun

It appears someone has sent a copy to the media. The slant of this article suggests it is not good news for the pilot.

Four Corners is going to tell the "real story of what happened that night." So I guess they have also got a copy if they have produced a story over the last couple of weeks. Hopefully it will be better than the 60 minutes story at the time.
john62 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 04:48
  #79 (permalink)  
prospector
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The crew made four attempts to land in darkness before deciding to ditch after running out of fuel.
Decided to ditch?? Makes it sound as if they had options.
 
Old 30th Aug 2012, 02:02
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: middleofthehighway
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its out...

Here

Dog
Dogimed is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.