Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Question: Why are copilot endorsements considered `on the nose`?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Question: Why are copilot endorsements considered `on the nose`?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Aug 2011, 13:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question: Why are copilot endorsements considered `on the nose`?

With airline recruiting increasing in OZ and endorsement training at candidates expense, why do operators demand command endorsements when a copilot endorsement is sufficient to be a first officer? Seems illogical to require a copilot candidate with maybe only 250 hours TT to fly in command of a high capacity type.
sheppey is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2011, 14:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would guess that whilst pretty much the same endo, the company would then have to go thru a command endo when and if you upgraded, so extra sims etc
yowieII is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2011, 00:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You can't log ICUS with a copilot endorsement.

That would defeat the plans of many of the airline execs.

Regional airlines and small GA companies often give copilot endorsements. It's a way of keeping you from moving on to greener pastures, and putting up with bad T&Cs. The opposition who operate that Metro or Kingair won't hire you until it's a command endorsement. They don't want to fork out money to get you up to speed. They want you for nothing, or at their oppositions expense.

A company I worked for a while back only gave copilot endorsements. That way they knew you'd stick around to become a Captain and gain a command endorsement, or if you left, you would not be able to compete against them on the same type. Many companies are reluctant to hire you with a copilot endorsement.
It's a funny world this aviation game.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2011, 04:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the only addition for a command endo over and above a co-jo's is performing an RTO from the left-hand seat ? Correct me if I am mistaken.
ReverseFlight is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2011, 05:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Copilot endorsements were invented by DCA in the late '50s
(or early 60s) as a means to stop command-licenced pilots
appointed as FOs from running away to such airlines as CX.

Globally a copilot endorsement is crap, and the hours useless
as tits on a bull. Taking the P1 rating will stand you in good
stead for any future offshore opportunities.
Slasher is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2011, 07:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slasher. That's exactly how I remember it. But I thought they were dropped here as part of the ICAO alignment.
Old Akro is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.