Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Radio use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 11:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Adelaide
Age: 48
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radio use

Flying a big ring route over a CTAF I thought I was far away from oncoming RPT and did not want to Clag the comms. However the RPT did tell me it would be nice to get on the radio. As VFR I assumed CASA wanted us to stop all stations call. So moral of the story I have learnt't is to give your intentions even if it sounds crap and like myself balls the call!
dickair is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 11:40
  #2 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If there is even a remote chance that you are going to conflict with CTAF traffic, please get on the radio. It's the ones that I don't know about that really frighten the bejeezus out of me!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 11:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If there is even a remote chance that you are going to conflict with CTAF traffic, please get on the radio. It's the ones that I don't know about that really frighten the bejeezus out of me
And the five 172's in the circuit each making four calls a circuit in halting Engrish giving themselves numbers for landing doesn't? Not being able to understand or get a word in is just as dangerous Loog out the window!
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 12:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 51
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damm right!
was transitting the EDGE of Wagga once. Heard a REX Saab backtracking. Had a think about it. Appeared to me he was gunna be airborne about the same time I was going to be abeam the rwy centreline, so I gave him a call. They actually had me visual the moment they lined up, as they knew where to look for me.

Good use of the radio is quality airmanship. Speak up, be heard and be clear!

Jas
jas24zzk is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 13:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Problem is Johnny sitting up at 8500 feet in his PA31 or Jim in his C172 at 6500 closer than 10nm to the field, dont think they are in conflict. It feels pretty high up there in a bugsmasher.

Problem is most turbine aircraft achieve better than a 2:1 climb rate, generally closer to 1:1.

This means roughly at 6nm they could be passing 6000 feet on climb. Light, I can be heading through transition closer than 10nm from the field, especially if it's a downwind departure.

Talk them, it can't do any harm?
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 13:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Idlewild Peake
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is all about balance

Too many calls versus not enough calls. Think about it.
Always call taxiing, about to depart and inbound/overflying 10 miles. If there are no other aircraft in the area, then there is no one to talk to.
If there are no calls from other aircraft, continue in silence. Continue doing circuits, no need to call downwind, base or final. Continue if you are departing, no need for any other calls.
If another aircraft calls inbound or taxiing and they are a potential conflict then speak up - tell them your position, altitude and intentions.

Last edited by uncle8; 22nd Aug 2011 at 13:42. Reason: can't spell
uncle8 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 13:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 51
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your right Goblin,
I was either 7500/8500 when i made my call to the REX boys. They had acheived my level by the time the passed behind me. (they did alter heading to pass behind)

Just coz I was high didn't mean i was still out of potential conflict.

And Yep uncle. too many calls simply stops the one you want to know about from transmitting.
jas24zzk is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 22:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Perth
Age: 41
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just because you dont hear another aircraft doesnt mean you shouldn't make a radio call.

The AIP contains all the required radio calls and these days there is only need for a downwind call with intentions just like it used to be before NAS.

When in doubt make a call even if its not in the right order (AIP can help you practice), it helps to know where everyone is and allows everyone to have a greater situational awareness.

Last edited by Aeromuz; 23rd Aug 2011 at 03:58.
Aeromuz is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 23:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 350
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uncle... If I understand your post you’re saying not to bother making a call if you don’t hear anyone else?

If so, what if the inbound aircraft does exactly the same? No calls because they can’t hear anyone else.... could lead to several aircraft approaching the CTAF at the same time...

Of course we are required to look out the window, but as has been proven, it doesn’t provide 100% protection.
717tech is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2011, 23:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
As VFR I assumed CASA wanted us to stop all stations call.
Not CASA, Dick Smith and his mates at NASIG. They even got it put into AIP for a time - what a disgrace. Fortunately, CASA finally saw sense an AIP now encourages pilots to speak up.

For those of you who think "looking out the window" will save you from a midair with a turboprop or jet, think again. I don't particularly mind if you kill yourself through bad airmanship; the fact is though that you will probably take many innocent lives with you in the other aeroplane you run into.

If in doubt, speak up (and that includes if you're in E airspace anywhere near a D tower)!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 00:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Idlewild Peake
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm all in favour of making all necessary calls but dislike making too many. The AIP gives us some discretion - it's worth a look.

717, When we announce ourselves, either inbound or outbound, other conflicting traffic has the opportunity to make contact, we are relying on them. Similarly if we are in the area and someone else calls taxiiing or inbound, it's up to us to speak.
uncle8 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 01:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
717, When we announce ourselves, either inbound or outbound, other conflicting traffic has the opportunity to make contact, we are relying on them. Similarly if we are in the area and someone else calls taxiiing or inbound, it's up to us to speak.
That's only true if they happened to catch your first call, or you, theirs.

From a ground ops perspective, there are a few benefits to more than one CTAF call, even on an otherwise quiet frequency:

1) Frequency verification, especially where there is no AFRU. If I'm at, say, Warwick (non-discrete CTAF) and I hear someone broadcast once, but only once, to Toowoomba traffic (which is a discrete CTAF), I might give them the benefit of the doubt. If they do it twice, I'll prompt them as to their incorrect frequency.

2) Ground vehicles and ground operations rely on good landing estimates to vacate the movement areas. This is especially the case at quite busy, RPT-serviced CTAFs like YWLM, YBUD, YPKG, YBTL etc where aerodrome works after hours are common. There is no guarantee a ground-based radio will receive your initial call at 10 or 15 miles, nor that you will hear any transmissions such a radio might make until you are much closer in. Admittedly not relevant if you're merely overflying.

3) As per (2) above, taxiing aircraft are often directing a their few meagre watts of VHF straight into the tarmac via belly-mounted antennas. No guarantees you can be heard or can hear - more calls equals more probability of detection.

4) Let's face it, none of us are as proficient at picking circuit entry estimates as we ought to be. I once spent some time operating a CA/GRS service and even those piloting shiny jets with quite good FMS equipment can be out by more than five minutes between initial entry estimate and their actual arrival. This is the difference between Joe Navajo (or, as I saw, Garry the Glider) being able to achieve another circuit or not. (In fact, a particular 737 pilot, having cocked his estimate up, then asked the glider he was turning base simultaneously with, if he wouldn't mind going around to allow the jet to land first.) More calls equals more opportunity for you to keep other traffic as aware of your position and intentions as is possible to be.

In short, except in the few cases where you have a genuinely congested frequency, I cannot equate good airmanship principles with fewer CTAF calls. What are you saving if the frequency is quiet? Time? Money? Fuel?
Woodwork is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 01:52
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Let's face it, none of us are as proficient at picking circuit entry estimates as we ought to be. I once spent some time operating a CA/GRS service and even those piloting shiny jets with quite good FMS equipment can be out by more than five minutes between initial entry estimate and their actual arrival.
??? With GPS, how can this be? I reckon that I consistently hit my circuit estimates +/- 30 secs at worst!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 02:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by Woodwork
except in the few cases where you have a genuinely congested frequency, I cannot equate good airmanship principles with fewer CTAF calls. What are you saving if the frequency is quiet? Time? Money? Fuel?
It's a case of always doing what you normally do. If you are in the habit of making lots of calls when there is nobody around (not much point in that) you are likely to do the same when it's busy.

Regarding jet ETAs, unless the approach has been loaded into the FMS, the ETA will not be correct, as the FMS will plan a "Straight-In" approach direct to the airport, ignoring any positioning for the runway to be used. It will start "slowing up" at 15 miles. If I then come barrelling into the circuit at 200kt, my original estimate will be wrong. This. of course, should be known and compensated-for by crews.

As for you, Doctor , obviously your ETA won't change if you're taking off, climbing, descending and landing all at the same speed of 60KIAS!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 03:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.. and it would be good if light aircraft have their transponders on even in a non radar environment, so that they'll show up on TCAS. Is this taught in flight schools these days?
training wheels is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 03:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 350
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
By definition "in the vicinity" of a non towered aerodrome includes ANY height above the aerodrome that could conflict with operations at the aerodrome.This could include the meat-bomber at FL140 or high performance aircraft arriving or departing.So don't just consider the horizontal requirement of 10 nms.
mates rates is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 04:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: over there
Age: 35
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hopefully PLASTOD (or X training schools equilivant) is still been taught
AussieNick is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 04:20
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
.. and it would be good if light aircraft have their transponders on even in a non radar environment, so that they'll show up on TCAS. Is this taught in flight schools these days?
It is a regulatory requirement (if you call AIP a regulation) to have your transponder switched on if one is fitted, regardless of the airspace type. Transponders are practically the only defence against midairs with fast turboprops and jets and it is critical that the regs be followed. If a trainer is not "teaching" it, they are being negligent.

Please Please Please make sure your transponder is on!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 06:39
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too many calls versus not enough calls. Think about it.
Always call taxiing, about to depart and inbound/overflying 10 miles. If there are no other aircraft in the area, then there is no one to talk to.
If there are no calls from other aircraft, continue in silence. Continue doing circuits, no need to call downwind, base or final. Continue if you are departing, no need for any other calls.
Please don't do this.

I can count 3 times in the last week this wouldn't have worked, thankfully by making regular calls the guys at the other end heard my 2nd or 3rd call and everyone was clear.
eocvictim is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2011, 08:40
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 145
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Better to speak up and be annoying, than to stay silent and be a statistic.
JustJoinedToSearch is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.