Nav. lights on during the day?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nav. lights on during the day?
Ahem.
Have noticed some pilots intentionally do this.
I struggle to understand why they do it. I suspect they think they are making themselves more visible.
I wonder how much more visible they think they are?
Have noticed some pilots intentionally do this.
I struggle to understand why they do it. I suspect they think they are making themselves more visible.
I wonder how much more visible they think they are?
Years ago the company I worked for (Bank Runs) had the policy of leaving the Nav light switches on at all times. One theory being, if unexpected poor vis was encountered, then it was one less thing to worry about.
The main reason however,was that after leaving the aircraft for the day, or evening, pilots were encouraged to always look back at the A/C as they walked away. If the batteries were inadvertantly left on (it happened more frequently than you may think), then the nav lights being on would alert the pilot to his/her error.
The company rational was that it was less expensive to replace the odd Nav light globe than to go through the cost of retrieving an aircraft with a flat battery.
The main reason however,was that after leaving the aircraft for the day, or evening, pilots were encouraged to always look back at the A/C as they walked away. If the batteries were inadvertantly left on (it happened more frequently than you may think), then the nav lights being on would alert the pilot to his/her error.
The company rational was that it was less expensive to replace the odd Nav light globe than to go through the cost of retrieving an aircraft with a flat battery.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Enroute from Dagobah to Tatooine...!
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I wonder how much more visible they think they are?
People do need to be careful though. In some types you won't see your 'three greens' with nav lights on during the day!
As far as the end of day 'last check' for battery on - the beacon would work better in most cases and is the preferred procedure for some operators. It would probably get your attention better being a flashing light.
Depends on the type you are flying.
On something like a Metro, you had a switch which you could select NAV lights (ground operations, night) and Nav and strobe (all operations once entering a runway).
So you had no choice. Once you turned the strobe lights on, the NAV lights were selected by default.
Personally I think if an operator (or individual) is worried about replacing a few globes, they can stick it where the sun don't shine. I'll have everything turned on whatever time of day especially in CTAFs. Those strobes or NAV lights could be the difference between some one seeing you from above or not on decent. We all know what happened when a 727 mowed down a 172 in the US that time.......
On something like a Metro, you had a switch which you could select NAV lights (ground operations, night) and Nav and strobe (all operations once entering a runway).
So you had no choice. Once you turned the strobe lights on, the NAV lights were selected by default.
Personally I think if an operator (or individual) is worried about replacing a few globes, they can stick it where the sun don't shine. I'll have everything turned on whatever time of day especially in CTAFs. Those strobes or NAV lights could be the difference between some one seeing you from above or not on decent. We all know what happened when a 727 mowed down a 172 in the US that time.......
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know this is going to sound simplistic and naive, but I was told it was left on when on the ground so that ground crew knew the aircraft was still 'live' (as if the sound of the APU wouldn't have told them that .. lol )
I know this is going to sound simplistic and naive, but I was told it was left on when on the ground so that ground crew knew the aircraft was still 'live' (as if the sound of the APU wouldn't have told them that .. lol )
Bottums Up
When I started multi-crew ops some 20 years ago on the Nord, Nav lights were on whenever electrical power was on, and rotating beacon on whenever the prop was going to spin.
We all know what happened when a 727 mowed down a 172 in the US that time.......
t Reply
t Reply
Mostly amused by this post. I am the one who pays for my bulbs if they go (about $5) and I would never consider NOT turning them on. It may not really increase visibility but why wouldn't you?
Aviation, in my mind, is about maximizing safety opportunities; not trying to second guess the potential value-add of a marginal addition to safety.
Looking around the cockpit I see a lot of other things that could be turned off too:
- that second magneto (only really needed if the first fails),
- the artificial horizon (only needed at night and in clound, why wear down the gyros, or electrons,
- the HSI, I've gotta itty magnetic compass - that'll do me
- the GPS (unless I'm direct to), I'm even required to navigate within tolerance of the old aids, so who needs it,
- the cockpit lights - after all I'm carrying a torch,
Mmmm ... Safety first, who's it gonna hurt?
Aviation, in my mind, is about maximizing safety opportunities; not trying to second guess the potential value-add of a marginal addition to safety.
Looking around the cockpit I see a lot of other things that could be turned off too:
- that second magneto (only really needed if the first fails),
- the artificial horizon (only needed at night and in clound, why wear down the gyros, or electrons,
- the HSI, I've gotta itty magnetic compass - that'll do me
- the GPS (unless I'm direct to), I'm even required to navigate within tolerance of the old aids, so who needs it,
- the cockpit lights - after all I'm carrying a torch,
Mmmm ... Safety first, who's it gonna hurt?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "live" aircraft idea is a very good one. Countless time I've approached an aircraft on foot from behind or the side and seen the Nav lights and realised it was "live" and given it a wide berth.
Go back one to CAR 195 though and it says that CAR 196 only applies at night and conditions of poor visibility. I seem to recall though several years ago there was a campaign launched by airservices for turning all lights on during the day in the terminal area to increase visibility
The last 3 operators I have flown with on 3 different continents including oz all had the same policy.
1. Nav lights on means there is live power going to the systems, be it from batt, APU or external. Next time you go get on a burner take a look. Reasoning, it is a warning to all, be it engineers, catering, refueling that there is live power.
2. Beacon right before starting engines
3.Strobes when entering the active.
4. Taxi or Landing lights ON On the roll to Top of Climb or through 10,000.
5. and a variation of either taxi light or landing lights on at top of decent or below 10,000' .
Simple really.
1. Nav lights on means there is live power going to the systems, be it from batt, APU or external. Next time you go get on a burner take a look. Reasoning, it is a warning to all, be it engineers, catering, refueling that there is live power.
2. Beacon right before starting engines
3.Strobes when entering the active.
4. Taxi or Landing lights ON On the roll to Top of Climb or through 10,000.
5. and a variation of either taxi light or landing lights on at top of decent or below 10,000' .
Simple really.
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. Nav lights on means there is live power going to the systems, be it from batt, APU or external...
airline jets in the past when no such practice existed and no
one got electrickeried dead. I think some smart arse may've
thought it up somewhere as a good way to avoid shouting the
bar and the excuse spread.
Only time I agree with the navs on during the day is when in
extremely limited vis, like fog, whereby the ice-cream trucks
have a good reference where your wingtips are and can avoid
bashing into them.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "live" aircraft idea is a very good one. Countless time I've approached an aircraft on foot from behind or the side and seen the Nav lights and realised it was "live" and given it a wide berth.
. I think the more fairy lights, beacons, and big light up signs saying 'This Is An Aircraft, Stupid' the better. Anything that minimises the risk of Wing Dings and other 'amusing' ramp incidents (where amusing is defined as someone else's ramp and/or someone else's aircraft
) is a good thing. I know it's an attitude that can lead to a culture where people have to hi viz their own shoes so they don't trip over them, but if it's not a big hassle I think they're a useful added precaution.
Last edited by Worrals in the wilds; 15th Aug 2011 at 09:11.
I'm no lawyer, but it strikes me as a really really bad piece of regulation to have one reg saying to turn your navlights on at all times, then another separate reg saying that that other reg only applies at certain times.
Why isn't car 196 listed as a subreg (eg CAR195(1a))??
Aviation regulation in Australia is hardly the regulator's and their legal teams' finest hour so maybe I shouldn't expect too much I guess..!
Why isn't car 196 listed as a subreg (eg CAR195(1a))??
Aviation regulation in Australia is hardly the regulator's and their legal teams' finest hour so maybe I shouldn't expect too much I guess..!