Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Spitfire Crashes at Ardmore - Again...

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Spitfire Crashes at Ardmore - Again...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jun 2011, 04:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: < 10ft AGL
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr Spitfire Crashes at Ardmore - Again...

Seems the spitty groundlooped and ended up with the nose kissing the ground...again...same pilot, same location.

Deja vu..?

See: http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-general-a...masterton.html
S.E.A.L.11 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 05:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear, wonder it it is insured and if so does our insurance go up again?

A1228/11 FROM: 09 JUN 2011 22:42 TO: 13 JUN 2011 23:00 EST
GRASS RWY 03/21 CLSD DUE SFC COND
Not sure the Spit was designed for tar seal surfaces!
c100driver is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 23:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: down there
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Konev is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 05:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Live in Taupiri, Waikato, work in the big smoke, New Zealand
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the NZ Herald
slackie is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 06:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"It wasn't his fault, but a strong wind came in behind him and just tipped him on to his nose." Mr Brown said the pilot was not injured and the aircraft was not damaged.
Not damaged? I find that hard to believe.

As for "not his fault"... the mind boggles.
remoak is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 06:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember during WW2, it was quite common for a WAAF to sit astride the fuselage to keep the tail down when taxying. However it had to happen! The pilot took off forgetting about the girl & complained of a CG problem & requested an immediate return. He was invited to make a very gentle circuit so the girl could hop off!
Nigel Osborn is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 20:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over the show like a madwomans crap
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Gawd

I've seen the picture, "not damaged"....? Looking at the prop blades bent 90deg would suggest otherwise, so I guess that's a(nother) bulk strip coming up. And why would you taxi a Spitfire, or any other type, on such wet grass? Its been hammering down here of late, the grass runways are closed, so what on earth was he doing on the grass? Maybe there is a rational explanation?
NoseGear is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 21:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wentworth
Age: 59
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel's got it. Forgotten skills, gravity is still the same as it was in 1941
Wallsofchina is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 00:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ask Dave Brown of Christian Aviation, he seems to have all the answers...
remoak is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 05:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wooden prop and low rpm..I don't think it "officially" requires a bulk strip..maybe just a boroscope
mattyj is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 06:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Age: 35
Posts: 242
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Saw it in the hangar today as I taxied past, "not damaged" is definitely being optimistic, but "less damaged than last time" appears to be an accurate assessment, at least cosmetically.
NZFlyingKiwi is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 19:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over the show like a madwomans crap
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qeh?

A Constant Speed, 4 bladed, bent at 90 deg "wooden" prop...? Seriously? I guess I just had it in my head it was a metal prop.
NoseGear is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 00:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ENZED
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I taxied past the Spit whilst it was on the grass.
The prop blades looked bent well back to me, ....I am sure wood would not do that. ?
LocoDriver is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 06:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its a TR IX..mark nines have a four bladed laminated wooden rotol prop..

promise..look at photo 2..

Doug Brooker's Spitfire - Photos - Graeme Hill - Weekend Hosts - RadioLIVE


back me up spitfire experts..?!
mattyj is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 21:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, four bladed wooden prop. The baldes are manufactured in Germany. The cost of the last lot was $40k per blade I recall...
Bastardos is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 02:24
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: wide left base 16"
Age: 53
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possibly a bit of prop precesion with a small gust up the ar$e at the wrong time, poor control positioning.

It's never one factor.

Tight turn with high power (small wheels, soft grass) aircraft has tendency to pitch forward (therefore tail up) or back depending on direction of turn and prop rotation.

He should go and do a few circuits in a Cub before getting back to the Spitfire!
Shredder6 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 06:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah it's far more likely that the aircraft stopped abruptly when taxied over soft ground. Oh look, a NOTAM saying the grass runway is closed due surface conditions... now I wonder what that means...

What a eff-wit. Don't let him fly it again!

Spits are quite happy on tarmac surfaces, ask the chaps at Duxford. Just land into wind.
remoak is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 07:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Perth
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its his Spitfire, he paid for it, therefore he can fly or crash it however he wants. When you get your own you can do the same.
chute packer is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 07:15
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does that mean that if I could afford to buy the Mona Lisa, I should be allowed to cut it up for confetti?

If you don't understand the concept of moral responsibility as applied to classic aircraft, you are just another bogan...
remoak is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 08:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
scratch a bogans 65 thunderbird with left hand drive..in gloss black with orange flame and he'll cry for a minute, then cut you bad dude..priorities!
mattyj is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.