Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Legal Question - Flying From Private Property?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Legal Question - Flying From Private Property?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Apr 2011, 19:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Legal Question - Flying From Private Property?

Lets assume that Sunfish has just found Ten acres to build his "dream home" on in rural Victoria.

It's a level bush block with a nice flat area for an airstrip with no obstacles to speak of and no houses directly under the approach paths.

It's about 500m from the centre of a small town, but the nearest houses are around 350 metres away.

Assuming I bought it, and proceeded to safely fly in and out for private use only, is there any legal way for the inevitable complainer to stop me?
Sunfish is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 20:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 67
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, it needs to be zoned other than residential or rural to be sure of not getting successful challenges.
Shrike135 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 20:08
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Zoned "Rural living" - and the schedule of activities says nothing about prohibiting aviation. Noise might be an issue.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 20:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 67
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a prayer.
At 500 metres you would get group objections from the town.
500 metres would be well inside a suitable noise buffer zone
You would lose quite a large sector on takeoff because you can't make safe height over the town.
But the killer punch is the Rural Living Zoning
Rural Living is where the town's lawyers and doctors build their McMansions, and they've got money to fight noisy hobbies
You have to go out past that fringe - maybe 10 mins or so out, then talk to all neighbours within a km or so radius. If they all agree, there's a good chance.
Shrike135 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 21:25
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
About 66db - Rotax. Easily meets European standards.

The area is a holiday/retirement area.

Exactly what powers does the Victorian Government have over private aviation?

Lindsay Fox parks his helicopter at his house in Portsea - zoned high conservation residential. What's to stop me doing something similar?
Sunfish is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 22:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Speak to the local council? Each one would be different anyway, as no one seems to be able to standardise anything these days.

From a CASA point of you, you just have to follow the CAAP (or something just as good that would stand up in court) for ALAs, although I'm sure you'd know that sunfish.

You would lose quite a large sector on takeoff because you can't make safe height over the town.
I may not have understood this point but, you don't need to be at 1,000ft over the town if you are on Takeoff and/or Landing. You might though piss off the neighbours constantly doing that (ie; it may be friendlier to accept a downwind and go the other way if your plane allows)
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 22:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Geostationary Orbit
Posts: 374
Received 59 Likes on 22 Posts
Old topic, already solved..... yawn....

Search VCAT: UPSON VS CORANGAMITE 2005.

Get mowing.
thunderbird five is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 22:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sunfish....
A couple of things you may not have considered:
1/there is NO SUCH THING as a "dream house" in Victoria.... it just isn't possible
Lindsay Fox parks his helicopter at his house in Portsea - zoned high conservation residential. What's to stop me doing something similar?
2/Lindsay Fox has a lot more money to pay off councils, than I presume, you do.

good luck though
apache is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 22:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know of several strips that have been shut down through council action due to complaints from neighbours regardless of zoning. Whilst it's legal to fly below 500ft on approach and takeoff, people still don't like low aircraft over their homes. Worst case is when other aircraft visit your place and the neighbours get jealous of you and your mates enjoying themselves, watch the fun begin. Most often strips get restrictions for a sole aircraft onle, ie. The owner.

On the flip side I know of strips operating privately for many years without issue. One that comes to mind is right in the heart of Stratford - google it. Another one is interesting, he used to get complaints from most neighbors from his 912 Skyfox (very quiet aircraft), some years later, all his neighbours (3 of them) have aircraft now (at strips elsewhere) and the horse stud that used to complain the most, now operates their own R44!

On the face of it, your proposed site does seem a little close to suburbia to be assured of 100% success.

Isn't there a rule somewhere about being 500 meters from persons not involved in aviation or is that just an RA-Aus rule?
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2011, 23:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand it, the legal case is easy. The same law that underpins our right to garage a car at home applies to aircraft. Its a legal precedent that dates to the horse & buggy era. The problem is that there has never been a proper challenge, so instead there is the crazy dance between councils trying to apply made up local regulations and aircraft / helicopter owners wanting to avoid legal costs and being ostracised by neighbors.

Lindsay Fox overcame his difficulty using the pre-existing use clause. When a friend had similar problems he engaged the same lawyers to run the same argument and you've never seen a council back down faster.
Old Akro is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2011, 02:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tipping my hat to the differences in Vic and NSW aviation regulation, the council is certainly not in a position to tell you how to operate an aircraft. They are, however, in a strong position to tell you how you can utilise your land, particularly where it affects neighbouring property owners.

Have a look at this private strip in suburban Newcastle, which applied for permission to build a hangar:
http://www.newcastle.nsw.gov.au/__da...rt_Item_29.pdf

That application was approved, but the (potential) killer in it is this little aside:
The objectors' concerns include: .... potential loss of property values; health and amenity impacts on neighbouring residents; ....
Woodwork is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2011, 03:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sunfish,

Surprisingly, one answer would be to move to NSW.

We have some quite interesting laws defining "quiet enjoyment" of your property, and then the local nimbys and their representative on the local council cannot kybosh "reasonable" movements rates on your private property.

As I recall, "reasonable" is about 10-20 movements per week.

Of course, there are limits to how close to "town" you can be, but in an acreage lifestyle area, not too much of a problem. I love the fine print, whena it comes to a "hangar", its a nono, but a building application for a "machinery shed" will whistle through.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2011, 03:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
66dB you say?

You could whipper-snip and chop firewood all day and produce around 115dB (at the source) but no-one would give 2 sh!ts.

But an aeroplane . That's different.

Tall poppy wankers.
FourBalls is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2011, 05:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Schofields
Posts: 62
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Sunfish,

There was a very similar discussion on this topic here (including some input from yourself):

http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-general-a...airstrips.html

PinkusDickus is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2011, 22:08
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Thank you all for your advice and the links to relevant cases.

Mcgrath:

From a CASA point of you, you just have to follow the CAAP (or something just as good that would stand up in court) for ALAs, although I'm sure you'd know that sunfish.
My understanding is that CASA makes "recommendations" for ALA's. They are not written in stone and CASA does not "Approve" ALA's.

Just God help you if you run into something that shouldn't have been there according to CASA's recommendations, because then the area wasn't satisfactory according to AC 091 - 225.

http://www.casa.gov.au/newrules/part.../ac091-225.pdf
Sunfish is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2011, 22:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Sorry Sunfish that's what I meant, obviously you don't have to follow CAAPS, but god help the man who doesn't and has to get up in court and justify himself!
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 06:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albany, West Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 506
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Sunfish, a couple practical aspects include:

1. ensure that there are no proposed urban or hobby farm developments near your dream block - which will then scream 'loss-of-amenity' even though you were there 1st

2. check with the electricity providor re any new proposed spur lines, and give them a detailed map of your block & strip regardless.

3. check with your proposed new neighbours re the planting of trees & hedges. Your 'adequate' length strip could soon have obstacles dead inline with your runway direction, and there's nothing you can do about it....except perhaps go STOL or rotary wing!

4. try for a reasonably level block which will give you flexibility in deciding operating direction and also whether L or R circuit is more friendly. Avoid situations where you have to make a straight in to avoid overflying noise sensitive locations - you'll remember, but your mates probably won't.

happy days,
poteroo is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 19:29
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Thank you for your comments Poteroo.

By the way I found a denizen of this particular area and asked him if there were likely to be problems with tree huggers, etc. The response

"Nah! No one cares. A bloke already has his own strip and aircraft and another has his own helicopter on his block."
Sunfish is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2011, 03:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So how are you going to sail your new yacht into the airstrip?
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2011, 09:18
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: china
Posts: 38
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Nothing beats being able to fly out of the backyard.

Is it really only 10 Acres? What are the dimensions? Either you don't need much runway or it's a long and narrow block.
12-47 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.