Can this be true?!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can this be true?!
While idling away my afternoon I got taking to a young budding instructor at YSBK who was filling me in on what the 'go' is for those 'lucky' enough to be starting out in our glorious world of aviation. It seems that one of the longest running and more respected names at YSBK has taken instructorcide to a new level....
To get the job in the first place you are subjected to the boss telling you how all your previous experience and training are wrong/badly done/pointless/worth nothing/have no structure/all of the above.
You are expected to work duty times of 6am to 6pm 6 days a week (the devils number if ever I saw it!). Of course during this duty time you get paid only for the flying hours you do, but are expected to do all other menial labour about the place, gratis.
Your pay is a whopping $27 an hour. Oh, and you need to take your tax and super out of that as you'll be subcontracting under your own ABN.
You will be expected to pay upwards of $1000 for your check to line, during which you'll have your confidence shredded by the above boss.
You'll then be expected to undertake further training to keep the job, including sim work to get up to speed with their own syllabus for IFR - at your cost of course. This will be at least 2 sessions a week.
You'll need to purchase at least 1, bur preferably 3 spare headsets for your students use, and also because you may need to do some scenic flights. This needs to be done inside your first month.
Once you've agreed to all the above, all you need to do to get the 'job' is to pay the company a bond of $750 committing to a year and you're living the high life!
If you can't cope with any of this then you'll have a thinly veiled insulting message about you on the company's website and be roundly slagged to all and sundry. Oh and your $750 is gone with it.
Does this REALLY still happen? Paying for your line checks? 72 hour weeks and getting paid for 10 hours of flying? Paid under the award, and having diddly work covers and the like? Then being BONDED for this honour?
Other than half of it being illegal, my heart goes out to the youngsters out there trying to make a way in aviation and having this in front of them. These operators need to go the way of the dinosaurs for the sake of everybody.
To get the job in the first place you are subjected to the boss telling you how all your previous experience and training are wrong/badly done/pointless/worth nothing/have no structure/all of the above.
You are expected to work duty times of 6am to 6pm 6 days a week (the devils number if ever I saw it!). Of course during this duty time you get paid only for the flying hours you do, but are expected to do all other menial labour about the place, gratis.
Your pay is a whopping $27 an hour. Oh, and you need to take your tax and super out of that as you'll be subcontracting under your own ABN.
You will be expected to pay upwards of $1000 for your check to line, during which you'll have your confidence shredded by the above boss.
You'll then be expected to undertake further training to keep the job, including sim work to get up to speed with their own syllabus for IFR - at your cost of course. This will be at least 2 sessions a week.
You'll need to purchase at least 1, bur preferably 3 spare headsets for your students use, and also because you may need to do some scenic flights. This needs to be done inside your first month.
Once you've agreed to all the above, all you need to do to get the 'job' is to pay the company a bond of $750 committing to a year and you're living the high life!
If you can't cope with any of this then you'll have a thinly veiled insulting message about you on the company's website and be roundly slagged to all and sundry. Oh and your $750 is gone with it.
Does this REALLY still happen? Paying for your line checks? 72 hour weeks and getting paid for 10 hours of flying? Paid under the award, and having diddly work covers and the like? Then being BONDED for this honour?
Other than half of it being illegal, my heart goes out to the youngsters out there trying to make a way in aviation and having this in front of them. These operators need to go the way of the dinosaurs for the sake of everybody.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dog House
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly why airlines these days can get away with having pilots pay their way into the cockpit........what an industry!
Like paying your way to an improved Stockholm Syndrome really....
Like paying your way to an improved Stockholm Syndrome really....
I've seen worse.
Generally the Pilots cause this situation. The keen ones hang around looking for scraps at the flying school, and slowly over time the above situation develops.
I remember one instructor at my school worked 90 paid flying hours in his first year, and was there full time including weekends.
Generally the Pilots cause this situation. The keen ones hang around looking for scraps at the flying school, and slowly over time the above situation develops.
I remember one instructor at my school worked 90 paid flying hours in his first year, and was there full time including weekends.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coming from a background in the construction industry to aviation (currently undertaking CPL training) it still amazes me the work and pay conditions in aviation. The amount of effort, passion and money (if you don't have the luxury of your parents forking out the cash) that goes into being a qualified pilot is so much more than any position in the construction, but with no reward but the ability to make some cash for doing something you love.....
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't get the gist of your post Goblin. What exactly are you saying? It's the pilots who are 'keen' to try and break into the industry by 'hang'ing around flying schools looking for a job that are responsible for the crap conditions they are offered?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did mention AFAP however the instructor in question was dubious about causing a stir as they didn't want to get a reputation as a trouble causer. Also I wonder if this well known CFI's reputation as a loud mouthed dragon of a lady also puts them off?
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really feel for young kids who haven't got the life experience or have a mentor to help them get away from shonky operators and realise that no one cares about their opinion. So many still believe that these dodgy companies control their future and wont confront them; if only they knew that the these operators are known only for their bad reputation.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Right here
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
She is not in a position to be disparaging of anyone's standards. Some of the exchanges between her and ATC are almost farcical and have had me laughing at first and then shocked at their amateurishness. I reckon even the US controllers would be having a laugh when she is departing the US on one of those ferry flights they are so famous for.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Right down and under
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I know who you guys are talking about, if im right, then that could explain why their instructors (except for the senior) are forever changing!?!
However I gotta say their aircrafts are in top condition!!
However I gotta say their aircrafts are in top condition!!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I know who you guys are talking about, if im right, then that could explain why their instructors (except for the senior) are forever changing!?!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NTH&STH,EAST&WEST
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now isn't it against labor laws to be a sub-contractor to 1 company?
If so, then why not name and shame these schools and get the AFAP, Labor dept and news papers involved.
If they can't afford to pay correctly, they can't afford to be in aviation.
There is also an issue of duty times being broken here too. Where is CASA??? Turning a blind eye??
NAME,SHAME and SHUTDOWN.
Where are their "senior" pilots? Are they helping to stand up for their junior colleagues?
Know wonder our flying schools are so sub-standard.
Also name the FOI who allows this to happen.
If so, then why not name and shame these schools and get the AFAP, Labor dept and news papers involved.
If they can't afford to pay correctly, they can't afford to be in aviation.
There is also an issue of duty times being broken here too. Where is CASA??? Turning a blind eye??
NAME,SHAME and SHUTDOWN.
Where are their "senior" pilots? Are they helping to stand up for their junior colleagues?
Know wonder our flying schools are so sub-standard.
Also name the FOI who allows this to happen.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Secret base in Hoth...
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gee sounds like these people on the east coast talk to some of the operators on the west coast... 
Sounds like the exact same sham as an operator out at YPJT..
I hope the Fair Work Ombudsman shuts them down, fines them and then throws their arses into gaol. Then they will learn what its like to be f@*k'd up the arse...
Sounds like the exact same sham as an operator out at YPJT..
I hope the Fair Work Ombudsman shuts them down, fines them and then throws their arses into gaol. Then they will learn what its like to be f@*k'd up the arse...
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Right down and under
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Neptunus Rex
$27 per hour? Outrageous! I was paid $20 per hour instructing on Cessnas at Parafield in 1887 - yes, 24 years ago.
On the other hand, again it's back to the "if this is the school you guys are talking about", their flying standard seems to be alright, flown with them (and a few others) before.
Simple answer is if people boycotted the operator then things will change. If pilots are willing to accept the conditions this is what will happen. Same will happen to airlines if pilots don't stand up.
However the issue then is how do people get enough experience to move on without working for free/sub par wages/scams.
However the issue then is how do people get enough experience to move on without working for free/sub par wages/scams.
well neville, the best way is to gaini some hours is to go and do some hard work and real flying 'out bush' and learn what an aircraft can really do! that is the sort of experience that will save your ass! not sitting in the right hand seat twiddling your thumbs!
bit of thread drift i know, but selling your soul to gain a few hours only leads to a situation where the person who gets the job isn't the best for it but the one who has the biggest bank account!
my two cents...........
bit of thread drift i know, but selling your soul to gain a few hours only leads to a situation where the person who gets the job isn't the best for it but the one who has the biggest bank account!
my two cents...........
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turns out this place has been changing instructors like nobodies business. As for help from a 'senior' instructor - well the only ones at BK are junior 3's and they're the ones getting shafted.
For those urging to get AFAP involved and shut them down - how many budding young pilots would be willing to do this and get themselves a name that could finish them before they've started? Surely this is where AFAP should be proactively taking action to protect the interests of our future pilots?
For those urging to get AFAP involved and shut them down - how many budding young pilots would be willing to do this and get themselves a name that could finish them before they've started? Surely this is where AFAP should be proactively taking action to protect the interests of our future pilots?