Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Monarchy V's Republic debate re aviation

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Monarchy V's Republic debate re aviation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2011, 23:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually "The Crown" is a privately run corporate entity situated in London's CBD and is also its own state answerable to no one. "The Crown" through various avenues appoints Presidents; and neither have our best interests at heart - just their own.

Wakey wakey
Erin Brockovich is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 23:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's why I reckon turf the states, have one set of rules and regs for everything Australia wide. The house of reps represent national and international issues, the senate represents the states, local government looks after the local issues

It wont ever happen because the un-representative swill, to borrow a phrase (I'm talking all houses of parliament) will never legislate themselves out of a job, state or federally. That's why I say make them an offer they can't refuse and be done with them
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2011, 06:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually "The Crown" is a privately run corporate entity situated in London's CBD and is also its own state answerable to no one.
Not since the Magna Carta.



As an Aside, it gives me the irits every time I see one of those info-tainment programs spruiking for a change of the Australian National Flag. Usually it involves some airhead reporter citing cultural relevance as an excuse to swap the Union Jack for a boomerang or a Kangaroo or some other pointless symbol. They also, without fail manage to get some uneducated idiot to come out with 'But we have another countries flag on our flag'.


It's about time some of these people learnt some history. Starting off with the fact that the Union Jack is just that. A symbol of unity comprised of the national identity of several countries. The basis of the Union Jack is the Georges Cross. A symbol that originates from as far back as the end of the Roman Empire (and was once the national symbol of France until they swapped with England). The Symbol of the Georges cross is recognised in the national colours of every country that was once territory of the Roman Empire. i.e. the Whole of the known world at one time.

So let’s think about which symbol might be most relevant to multicultural Australian society. Is it a boomerang or some other Indigenous and/or Australiana symbol? Or is it the Georges Cross? A symbol recognised by, and representative of over 90% of the world’s population and their (our) collective history.
psycho joe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.