50 operators closed down.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I said
Adjective pāgānus m. (feminine pāgāna, neuter pāgānum); first/second declension
1.Of or pertaining to the countryside, rural, rustic.
2.(by extension) rustic, unlearned
3.(substantive) villager, countryman
4.(substantive) civilian
5.(substantive, Ecclesiastical Latin) heathen, pagan.
1.Of or pertaining to the countryside, rural, rustic.
2.(by extension) rustic, unlearned
3.(substantive) villager, countryman
4.(substantive) civilian
5.(substantive, Ecclesiastical Latin) heathen, pagan.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rose, fair enough.
You guys look like a bunch of fools carrying on with this criptic diatribe.
This is a real topic that deserves discussion amongst peers and is being destroyed by a pair of try hards that can cut and paste from google, grow up and get back on topic, or go play with each other somewhere else, preferably in private.
The CAR 206 reference as is being discussed here is an interesting one, scenic flights, IMHO better fit the description of RPT, to and from fixed terminals, fixed schedule, general public and seat rate. More fitting the definition than most of these island hopping flights and cattle station mail runs.
But is this the intent of the legislation ?.
Why has it taken so long for this to become an issue in CASA's eyes ?.
What of the private seat limitation when applied to parachute ops in SC7, Twotter, C208, "Super" Beaver, BN2 and Cresco ?. Should the APF be able to regulate something that really looks like a commercial operation with paying pax strapped into a VH registered aircraft ?, even if only for half the flight .
CAR 232 check lists where an FOI stipulates different to the certified check list, based on his/her personal opinion ?.
There are others, please add as you see fit.
You guys look like a bunch of fools carrying on with this criptic diatribe.
This is a real topic that deserves discussion amongst peers and is being destroyed by a pair of try hards that can cut and paste from google, grow up and get back on topic, or go play with each other somewhere else, preferably in private.
The CAR 206 reference as is being discussed here is an interesting one, scenic flights, IMHO better fit the description of RPT, to and from fixed terminals, fixed schedule, general public and seat rate. More fitting the definition than most of these island hopping flights and cattle station mail runs.
But is this the intent of the legislation ?.
Why has it taken so long for this to become an issue in CASA's eyes ?.
What of the private seat limitation when applied to parachute ops in SC7, Twotter, C208, "Super" Beaver, BN2 and Cresco ?. Should the APF be able to regulate something that really looks like a commercial operation with paying pax strapped into a VH registered aircraft ?, even if only for half the flight .
CAR 232 check lists where an FOI stipulates different to the certified check list, based on his/her personal opinion ?.
There are others, please add as you see fit.
You guys look like a bunch of fools carrying on with this criptic diatribe.
I suspect, however, Rose/Kharon is only one fool with split personality
If an operator has been shut down, where is the hue and cry? Which operators? Where? Isn't the tourism industry up in arms? no?
It's a load of tripe if you ask me
...oh and as for the fancy prose: it reads like the drunken ramblings of a simple man out to impress or intimidate the feeble minded.
All except this:
Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I once had a LAME do some work on my aircraft. When he put the priming lines back on there were a few 'extra' crimps. It was only by chance that I spotted the fuel p!ssing all over the exhaust pipe (cold thank Christ) A student was priming while I was closing the cowl. If I hadn't seen that somebody WOULD have primed while the exhaust was hot in the future.
People who operate in this manner know that you wont take action and couldn't give a sh!t.
I'm saying that it's probably people like myself who've experienced something like this want action taken and CASA and government departments come up with what you speak of.
I agree with yours and all the others' sentiments. Personally I'm sick and tired of law targeted at the lowest common denominator but what do ya do?
Why has it taken so long for this to become an issue in CASA's eyes ?
