Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Selection of Levels in Controlled Airspace

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Selection of Levels in Controlled Airspace

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Dec 2010, 09:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Age: 43
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
willadvise,
If my memory serves (and too tired to look it up) in the previous version of the MATS there was an exception in teh non-standard level assignment section that gave an exception for radar to radar sectors, or something along that line. That was taken out/deleted in the latest addition or so. which is why us radar to radar sectors in theory have to go through the same hoo-haa and time wasting as everyone else.

everyone,
And if everyone is flying at standard levels still doesnt stop the crossing tracks (at the same sequential level, i.e. either both odds or both evens) from having a MAC, be it radar or proc airspace. In radar airspace thats what actually looking at whats coming into the airspace in the not too distant future is all about.

Anyway, off to watch the cricket highlights....
rotorblades is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2010, 01:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Block levels are a pet hate of mine, when not operationally necessary. I am aware of one international carrier that requests them as a matter of course, and when they fly into an adjoining FIR ATC would rather deny everyone else their planned level than cancel the block clearance. Grrrrrr.
I am surprised by this. If required, as an ATC you CANCEL the block clearance and assign a single FL. The pilot doesn't decide this.For info in Australia we are not allowed to give cruise/climb but are allowed to give block levels. Go figure????


Anyway, off to watch the cricket highlights....
I didn't think there were any?
max1 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2010, 03:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Orstraylia
Age: 60
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's just timetable it so no two aircraft are in one place at one time - should mean we can get rid of ATC all together - imagine the cost savings!!!!1!11!!one
Tongue in cheek i take it?

Seriously though, if you took a snapshot of some sectors around OZ, and observed the number of crossing tracks where, if all aircraft flew standard levels, the potential number of conflicts would be increased by applying the standard level requirement. The strict application of standard levels only works 95% of the time IMHO. The other 5% a level change or vector is required to avoid trouble. In en-route surveillance airspace 99% of the time i`ll change a level.

Some of the "armchair experts" from higher up need to take a look at the volume of traffic and the number of conflicts in most sectors. Maybe we could set up a project, call in the consultants and hold regular meetings to justify a large expense account associated with the project. I reckon we could stretch it our for a couple of years with no result at the end. Ooohh the "jollys". Overseas trips to Europe, the States etc. to coincide with a little sporting event or two on the side. Where do i sign up?
Roger Sir is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2010, 05:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey Roger,

Can you book this in for the next Ashes series in England, Rotorblades will be keen to go......
Anyway, off to watch the cricket highlights....
Not sure he will be getting any more first class treatment in the Retard Vehicle -10

Cheeky Bugger!

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2010, 10:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of the "armchair experts" from higher up need to take a look at the volume of traffic and the number of conflicts in most sectors. Maybe we could set up a project, call in the consultants and hold regular meetings to justify a large expense account associated with the project. I reckon we could stretch it our for a couple of years with no result at the end. Ooohh the "jollys". Overseas trips to Europe, the States etc. to coincide with a little sporting event or two on the side. Where do i sign up?
Now you've gone and done it. Expensive fact finding mission to follow.

It always amuses me when governments and large corporations quote a large $ amount spent on addressing concerns. Your average punter equates money spent equals getting a result. What they don't realise is that someone, or a lot of people, on a large salary flew business class (many times), stayed in 5 star hotels with expense accounts and wrote a report with all the required 'bingo' words i.e. Worlds Best Practice, key stakeholders, positioning for the future, the word paradigm at least 3 times, cost/benefit analysis, etc. The upshot is usually a direction that has some semblance of common sense but proves unworkable in an operational sense 100% of the time.
Which segues nicely into why this thread was started.

The difference between a rort and a perk? A rort is something that you are not involved in. I'll get in the queue with Roger Sir if this one gets up.
max1 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2010, 11:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Age: 43
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yo Jaba,
gotta gloat whist I can, its rare as rocking horse doo. Anyway the last 3 tests'll go to Australia. And ozzies didnt do tooo badly (in the last 2 english innings they only conceded about 1,130 runs for 6 wickets)
no more first class treatment


Tis honestly a shame the aussie team cant put on a better show I was looking for a really close series, whichever way it went/goes.

Rb
(secretly supporting Australia but dont tell the rest of the expats)
rotorblades is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2010, 23:28
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RB

I think over some fine Indian Curry we discussed the up coming Ashes.....looks like I will have to eat my words and take another dose of that chilli stuff

Being flogged at home is something we colonials are not good at taking

NOTAMS should read, on first contact with BNE CEN north of Sydney and detecting a pommy accent, request unworkable levels and tracks

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2010, 04:47
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Running up that hill
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thing the higher ups miss is that standard levels only work if the conflicting traffic are in different hemispheres. They hear 'opposite direction' and imagine same track and opposite direction.

Traffic crossing at MRW north of PH is a perfect example. Inbound to PH,a/c tracking just east of south at standard level. Outbound a/c tracking just east of north wants same standard level. (As an aside I gather NZ runs N/S standard levels rather than E/W because most of their traffic is N/S.)

Standard levels have a powerful attraction for managers and regulators though. Firstly, 'Standard' is currently a holy word. Secondly, non-standard levels have figured in more than a few incidents. There are no reports or studies that show the millions of conflicts solved by non standard levels, so that doesn't figure in the thought processes.

As per usual, the problem with armchair experts is not that they don't know and understand, it's that they don't know or understand that they don't know and understand.

PS. Is it cricket time again?
Nautilus Blue is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2010, 06:00
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Orstraylia
Age: 60
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are no reports or studies that show the millions of conflicts solved by non standard levels, so that doesn't figure in the thought processes.

If i`ve told you once i`ve told you a million times, don`t exaggerate!

Good point Nautilus. The airspace i`m thinking of would have many, many conflictions per day with all aircraft operating at standard levels. From my memory there has been two instances over a lenghty period of time where two got too close whilst operating at a standard level. How many times has a non-standard level been used to keep `em apart? I`d hazard a guess and say 20 times per day but i could be wrong.

Only in Canberra does one size fit all!

RB, When is the next game old boy? Too soon methinks. Ooohhhh the pain..

Last edited by Roger Sir; 9th Dec 2010 at 06:04. Reason: Forgot to mention the cricket!
Roger Sir is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2010, 18:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Age: 43
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roger Sir,
I think it starts thursday-ish in Perth. And look on the bright side, things can only get better. Dont worry England are good at throwing things away so you'll win the series 3-1.

Jaba
You'll have to add onto that NOTAM : Expect Vectors for Controller Amusement
And that chilli stuff was just outrageously hot, although the look on your face did make me want to get my camera

Cheers All
Rb
rotorblades is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.