Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Coffscity skydivers 207 prang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2010, 23:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coffscity skydivers 207 prang

I have been looking on the ATSB site and have not been able to find any reports for this accident, given there is a history of recent incidents for this operator I would have thought this one would have been investigated. can anyone shed any light ?

Last edited by Aerodynamisist; 21st Oct 2010 at 06:13.
Aerodynamisist is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2011, 12:37
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still no joy
Aerodynamisist is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 00:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Skydive operators have demonstrated for years an uncanny ability to keep serious incidents involving their aircraft well and truly on the quiet.
YPJT is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 14:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Secret base in Hoth...
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PVT ops, why should CASA care...

No fare paying pax on those flights, plus being PVT ops - doesn;t that mean you are not required to pay your pilots?

CCS - joke of an organisation!
ContactMeNow is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 20:49
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not CASA in this case, this is ATSB's jurisdiction. They should care as there were people on board.
Aerodynamisist is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 22:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can assure you CASA do care. I've seen FOI's grill the pilots for W+B calcs. The "operator" in question is/was nothing more than a bunch of cowboys who should never have been issued licenses.
PA39 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2011, 00:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Speaking of W&B. The usual load on a 182 jump aircraft is pilot plus 5 x meatbombs. I don't have the figures handy but I think you'd be hard pressed to squeeze that many in, with rigs and enough fuel of board for a couple of loads and still be under MTOW.
YPJT is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2011, 11:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gods Country
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel for a couple of loads and be under weight, not likely, unless they were all small, but fuel for one load and be under weight, most definitly. C182 p and above I think, have an increased MTOW over the earlier models, but they can have wingtip extensions and get increased MTOW under STC.
Back in day . . . .

Totally agree that skydiver aircraft operators have a knack of keeping accidents and incident things out of record books, I know of at least 3 that I can find no record of at all, despite serious and permanent disabling injuries in one.
Lancair70 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2011, 21:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FWIW.....the pilot of the "disorganisation" in question couldn't do the calcs!!
PA39 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.