Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Wheels up landing - feather or not???

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Wheels up landing - feather or not???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Oct 2010, 12:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: melbourne
Age: 54
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheels up landing - feather or not???

OK, so if we are all going to do this one day - land with gear up!
What about feathering?
Lets start with a piston engine non-turbo twin
Do we feather or not?
And why?
2211race is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2010, 13:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Select gear down instead. It's cheaper and requires less power to get to the terminal.
psycho joe is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2010, 13:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whatever is required at the time in respect to runway surface, weather conditions including wind, services on standby, ATC, aircraft weight.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2010, 13:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From what I remember of previous posts on this question, you are better off flying the thing all the way to the ground. Feathering, particularly at the wrong time or altitude could well turn what would be a stable approach into a messy descent well short of your preferred landing point.

Another consideration is that deliberately feathering will turn the blades onto an axis that will not bend so easily, perhaps digging in one or both sides and turning your asphalt bobsled ride into an undignified flip.

Finally, as far as I am concerned, once the gear failure was confirmed to be more than just a blown down and locked indicator light, the aircraft belongs to the insurance company so don't get too excited about trying to limit engine damage. Flying the emergency to minimise the risk of injury to yourself and pax far outweighs trying to save on some repair bills.

Last edited by YPJT; 16th Oct 2010 at 13:57.
YPJT is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2010, 14:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: global gypsie
Age: 52
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about contacting "Myth Busters". Let them run a few time-xed cheiftains down their abandoned cisco runway and wait for the verdict?? Or better still just call international rescue. Im sure i remember Thunderbird II has a pod which has the special aircraft supporting motorised units which take the place of the gear. If you have the skill, a runway long enough and a great sense of humour? No dramas.
thrustpig is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2010, 18:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,233
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Do not feather under any circumstances.
Doesn't matter what kind of engine is installed.
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2010, 19:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Answered
Much Ado is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.