Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Plese help RE: CPL Air Law - Refuelling

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Plese help RE: CPL Air Law - Refuelling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2010, 00:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plese help RE: CPL Air Law - Refuelling

Hi guys,

Below is a question from the 2008 version of Bob Tait's CPL Air Law textbook that I am having trouble with. The correct answer is listed as (c) as bolded below.

Q: Passengers may not embark or disenbark from an aircraft of six seat capacity

a) During refuelling with AvGas
b) During refuelling with AvTur with anti-static additive
c) During any refuelling operation
d) When no earth wire is connecting the aircraft to a suitable earth point

I originally thought the correct answer should be (a) as CAO 20.9 p4.2.1 says:

The operator of an aircraft must ensure that avgas is not loaded onto an
aircraft while passengers are on board, or entering or leaving, the aircraft.

To me the above quote says that under no circumstances is AvGas alowed to be loaded on to an aircraft with passengers on board, embarking or disenmbarking.

The reference quote given for the correct answer is CAO 20.9 p4.2.3 which simply says:

Subject to paragraph 4.2.4, the operator of an aircraft without an underwing
fuelling system must ensure that fuel is not loaded on to the aircraft while
passengers are on board, or entering or leaving, the aircraft.

(p4.2.4 refers to non-ambulatory pax remaining on board)

Can you see why I am confused? Does the part about 'six seat capacity' in the question have any significance here? I cannot seem to find it. Is it somewhere mentioned that aircraft with a 6 seat capicity or less cannot have an underwing fueling system? This is the only way I can see the 'correct' answer and reference quote making any (sort-of) sense.

Your help is much appreciated as my exam is on Friday (I am not currently doing any training at a flying school so cannot ask instructors). From this afternoon I will be away for two days, probably without acess to internet so I will try respond if there is an answer befre I leave. Otherwise I will when I get back.

Many thanks,

Opso
ops_guy is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 01:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Think about it like this, you need to have approval from CASA to refuel with punters on-board.

If it does not say this, then the answer will be C.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 01:03
  #3 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
4.2.3 Subject to paragraph 4.2.4, the operator of an aircraft with a maximum seating capacity of less than 20 must ensure that fuel is not loaded on to the aircraft while passengers are on board, or entering or leaving, the aircraft.

4.2.4 The operator of an aircraft with a maximum seating capacity of less than 20 may allow fuel that is not:
(a) avgas; or
(b) an aviation turbine grade which does not contain an anti-static additive;
to be loaded on to the aircraft while a passenger is on board if:

(c) the passenger’s medical condition is such that he or she cannot leave the aircraft without assistance; and
(d) the conditions set out in paragraph 4.2.2 are satisfied.
Pretty self explanatory. No mention of ambulatory passengers, answer is C.
 
Old 31st Aug 2010, 01:26
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tmpffisch - According to the latest version of CAO, those references say different things. That may be what the problem is - it has been changed since the 2008 issue of the Bob Tait Textbook. Here are the same references as you quoted from the latest version (my bolding to highlight)


4.2.3 Subject to paragraph 4.2.4, the operator of an aircraft without an underwing
fuelling system must ensure that fuel is not loaded on to the aircraft while
passengers are on board, or entering or leaving, the aircraft.

4.2.4 The operator of an aircraft that cannot be underwing fuelled may allow fuel to
be loaded onto the aircraft while a passenger is on board if:
(a) the passenger’s medical condition is such that he or she cannot leave the
aircraft without assistance; and
(b) the aircraft’s cabin door is open; and
(c) the equipment used for loading or unloading passengers (if any) is in
position at the door; and

(d) the requirements and conditions set out in paragraph 4.2.2 are satisfied.


So I think we may have found the issue - the CAO has been updated since the textbook I am currently using. Let that be a lesson to those of you studying that you have the latest text book and are familiar with what the Regulations and Orders actually say - don't put all your faith in the textbook. Silly me.

Thanks guys.
ops_guy is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 01:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't be confused by the 6 seat capacity. It may as well have been a 2 seat aircraft, however if it had said 100 capacity it would get confusing as is is far more likely to have an underwing refuelling system (which is not even mentioned in the available answers).

Last edited by VH-XXX; 31st Aug 2010 at 01:57.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 01:41
  #6 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry.

Still gives you the same answer though........
 
Old 31st Aug 2010, 02:09
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry.

Still gives you the same answer though........
Well since the CAO has been changed that question probably wouldn't come up in the test (ie: no reference to aircraft of seating capacity less than 20 in the refuelling requirements) and I guess worded differently to account for the underwing fuelling system.

Thanks again,

Opso

Last edited by ops_guy; 31st Aug 2010 at 02:34.
ops_guy is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 02:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think you need to have a practical perspective of this. Would you shutdown a 210 with a full load of punters at a fuel bowser in Jabiru, and proceed to top her up for the trip home to Darwin?
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 03:05
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you need to have a practical perspective of this. Would you shutdown a 210 with a full load of punters at a fuel bowser in Jabiru, and proceed to top her up for the trip home to Darwin?
Well according the CAOs you cannot have people on board at all when refuelling with AvGas. As I'm doing my Air Law Exam I will be needing to answer with what the Regs/Orders say. So to answer your question, legally you should have the punters off the plane whilst you refuel.
ops_guy is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 12:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exactly my point
The Green Goblin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.