Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Mid-air near Fielding 26 July 2010

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Mid-air near Fielding 26 July 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jul 2010, 04:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mid-air near Fielding 26 July 2010

Anyone have any fresh info on the mid-air being reported on stuff.co.nz? Apparantly two 152's. Near Fielding Aerodrome?
Offcut is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2010, 05:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the NZ Herald:

Two dead in Feilding plane collision - National - NZ Herald News

Flew over Fielding several times today in/out of Palmy, stunning day there...

Condolences to those affected....

S2K
Sqwark2000 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2010, 05:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As reported in the media. Two 152s, both from the same operator. Two fatal injuries in one, with the second aircraft landing with damage.
Aerozepplin is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2010, 06:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Photo here now...
Two dead in Feilding plane collision - national | Stuff.co.nz

don't know if emergency services did any cutting of the aircraft, but either way, that's one flat 152.

Condolences to all those involved.
sleemanj is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2010, 07:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wellington
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Condolences to all.

I know it is a little too soon to speculate on the causes of this one, but it is the third fatal mid-air in the area in 6 years - Massey, Paraparaumu , and now this.
Weekend_Warrior is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2010, 20:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wellington
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nature of the beast...

...?? I don't believe a mid-air collision is in the nature of the beast at all.

I have my own theory about what has contributed to these crashes (and a few more) but will maybe air them at a more appropriate time.

Let's let the bodies cool first.

And I don't think you can compare GA to Military flying - apart from the fact that the aeroplanes look the same.
Weekend_Warrior is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2010, 22:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was reported in todays Dominion Post that the solo pilot landed sans engine power and front wheel. Perhaps one aircraft descended upon the other? The 152 at the lower altitude would not see the other aircraft if it was above and would be reliant on accurate reports on location, etc.
Bastardos is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2010, 01:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I know it is a little too soon to speculate on the causes of this one, but it is the third fatal mid-air in the area in 6 years - Massey, Paraparaumu , and now this.
.....and MDAC 20 years ago!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2010, 03:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah yes, that was the one where the last radio Tx was "dugga dugga dugga..."

Boys will be boys... t'was ever thus...
remoak is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2010, 08:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was reported in todays Dominion Post that the solo pilot landed sans engine power and front wheel. Perhaps one aircraft descended upon the other?
The image of the surviving aircraft I've seen on the news shows it also missing the top half of the engine cowl, possibly it's been removed post landing, but looked more torn off.

I can't find a static image of it, but it's in this video at about 1 minute in...
Husband remembers wife lost in Feilding Cessna crash - National - Video - 3 News
sleemanj is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2010, 19:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 43 S
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe optical illusion but does the lower leading edge of the left wing look a bit wavy?
Nasty business for sure
aldee is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2010, 20:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears that way to me too. Just so, so tragic.

Weekend, some posts have been deleted, including mine (I can't recall saying anything insensitive?) but I'm guessing someone tried to draw parallels with our Huey accident on ANZAC day...?

As you say... nothing at all similar between civvy and military flying - in my opinion.
kiwi chick is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 00:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: asia
Age: 51
Posts: 176
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Admittedly this is a congested piece of airspace, but it's bloody frustrating that these accidents keep happening! Especially when there is relatively cheap technology out there that would help prevent it! Google Zaon MRX or Monroy ATD, something like this set up to let you know when there's traffic within 1mile and 500ft would be just the duck's knuts as a backup to VFR. All for less than 1k USD! Bloody cheap compared to what a crash like this costs, in $ and more so in lives!
It's not the only answer, but it's a start! We can't afford to just shake our heads and carry on doing what we've always done, and accept that every now and again there's going to be a tragedy.
buggaluggs is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 02:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep one of three things must've happened..aircraft A flew into aircraft B, or aircraft B flew into aircraft A or aircraft A and aircraft B flew into each other..if you trained in a busy airfield or training area then-"there but for the grace of god..."
mattyj is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 03:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NT
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Were they doing overhead rejoins?, We need to get rid of the idea that all student pilots approach an airfield this way, Its not in the CAA rules, its not what happens in the real world I think our training organisations need a mind change on this one. Wasn't OHRJs and turning left after landing even if you are supposed to go right for the days of no radios?
VH-VIN is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 05:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Jungle
Age: 39
Posts: 285
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
VH-VIN,

You are right in that the utility of overhead rejoin's should be discussed, but what is the alternative? I still think it should be taught, I still do them from time to time in the Caravan's that I fly to unattended and even 'attended' (in the loosest sense of the word) aerodromes.

Is there not potential for a collision in any unattended joining procedure if you fail to spot or take account of the traffic?
Massey058 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 05:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SOHRJ's are a completely safe procedure if done 'standard' i.e flying the right pattern with appropriate radio calls.

How do you expect someone to determine the runway in use and any other traffic (incl. NORDO) at an unattended aerodrome without flying overhead to check the windsocks.

As for not happening in the real world, I can whole-heartedly say that it is a current and well used procedure in NZ. I've even done one in B1900D at a busy NZWR circuit...

S2K
Sqwark2000 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 06:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hallo people, We are not fliers, but very close, long standing friends of Pat Smallman the lady who died yesterday in the fielding crash. We are in London and had been friends of Pat for over 30 yrs. Mary, my wife travelled with Pat to Africa on 3 month safari's testing the boundaries and exploring the depths of forests for Gorilla's and we have lost one of the warmest, friendliest, funniest, lovliest live wires you could ever wish to meet. One so full of life and always, even at her age wishing to grow even stronger by learning, she tested boundaries of her life, but was as responsible as anyone in how she executed what she attempted - careless she was not. We did not know the instructor, but another young life taken too. I thank you sincerely for the offers of condolences in the earlier posts.

I did not wish to hijack a predominantly 'flying and aviation forum, I frequent a few forum in the UK myself and know how powerful they can be so what I would like to say here, now that I found these comments about the situation there in Fielding is please do whatever the industry can to change things if you can or if they are needed in the Aerodrome there if you feel it is needed, or anywhere else for that matter where small aircraft are vulnerable. I see someone saying for a 1000 $ something could have been done which could have made this avoidable - is there anyone out there pushing for these things to been applied?

Two very wholsesome people have had their lives snatched away from them in a flash and whilst I am sure all over the world these kind of losses are felt as painfully as these are here in this Fielding crash, but it's those who are in positions of strength within the industry who can change things for those who follow so that families and fellow flyers can be sound in the knowledge that things like this cannot happen.

The poor lad who survived this in the 2nd plane will have to live with this too, no matter where the fault lies eventually, it is not something easily lived with.

I wish all of you flyers, either professionals or just doing what Pat did living the dream a safe future and trust someone somewhere can make this a safer journey.

We will miss her greatly as will her family and other friends we never got to meet, this puts a human element to the techi side of things so please, if you can, press for safety changes. Try not let their lives be lost in vain.

Thank you.

Andrew and Mary Pain
Blackheath London
Mary & Andrew is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 07:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NT
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree there is a place for them but not every time. It is often safer to work in with other traffic either joining straight in or down wind. This should taught as well but doesnt seem to be the case. Finding out what the wind is can be done by allot of other ways other than looking at the wind sock from 1500 feet.
VH-VIN is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 07:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overhead joins

I completed a PPL in February, and overhead joins were definitely a hot topic and enforced rigourously. So too was the 500 foot climb level off and have a look before continuing the climb concept, so from my personal experience these concepts are well managed in the ppl curriculum in NZ. This was for a location with marginally higher traffic density to the one this incident occurred at.
latewings is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.