Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Ground operations at GAAPs post June 3 2010 - safer?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Ground operations at GAAPs post June 3 2010 - safer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jul 2010, 09:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 286
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
Does the USA have many class D towers with airspace only 3nm in radius?
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2010, 10:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
While we're at it ... lets drop this "we have to harmonise with the rest of the aviation world" crap!

It would be an interesting exercise to compare the alphabet airspaces in each aviation country .... and see who is actually harmonising

Even Class G is different between ICAO states ... some give IFR traffic, some don't ... some even control aircraft in G

The sooner we get honest with ourselves, drop the harmonising crap, and massage the alphabet to suit AUSTRALIA ... the better.
peuce is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2010, 10:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Privateer (apt name),

There should be a taxi clearance not a taxi broadcast when the tower is in operation.
There is. Read your AIP.

If your issued specific exit instructions off the runway theres no need to report your location (really tower should hand ya to ground) Example Tower: VH-OZY exit taxiway Golf contact ground 119.2
And if not? Read your AIP.

If you exit and then contact ground.....yeah ICAO says tell'm where your at and where you wanna go.
So what? We use AIP as the rule-book.

No you don't need a clearance to cross an unlit runway at night when the tower is closed. When its closed D is no longer in effect.
I wonder who you would get a clearance off to cross an unlit runway at a non-towered airport?

And while I am on a rant....theres no bloody need to report how many POB's when you filed a bloody flight plan.
Yes there is. Read your AIP.

I suggest you direct your rant at AsA/CASA. We just do what the book says; A concept that you and your NAStronauts have trouble grasping.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2010, 20:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In an Airplane
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt. Boggs.

That was my point. Perhaps you missed the sarcasm directed at previous posts.

Oh except for the POB's I was serious about that. Sure the AIP calls for it however its still retarded and cloggs up the radio.
privateer01 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 00:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Enroute from Dagobah to Tatooine...!
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oh except for the POB's I was serious about that. Sure the AIP calls for it however its still retarded and cloggs up the radio.
Not for those of us who have frequent, last-minute changes to POB...
Captain Nomad is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 01:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
-and what would that be? Awol, not having a go at you...if you are busy elsewhere on a system that is only less than 6 weeks old, one does have to ask, where are your attentions most needed?
The fact the system is only 6 weeks old is part of the problem. We too are learning how best to manage it. Generally speaking SMC is also doing the COORD role (however once it starts ramping up we separate these jobs). This means we might be talking to the associated TCU or anyone else for that matter - which is why we split the jobs apart when it's busy.

This morning we had 12 aircraft taxiing for departures or circuits. There was also the odd arrival in the mix. The SMC is responsible for issuing each taxi clearance, a time check to all departing aircraft, writing up each strip for each aircraft, chasing up the correct readback from each aircraft (usually the most arduous part of the job at the moment while everyone learns the correct readback). There is a lot of heads down time whilst writing on the strips plus the fact we are generally looking after up to 10 aircraft for 2 separate runways.

It's just not always possible for us to be monitoring every single arrival to watch where they vacate is all I meant.
Awol57 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 05:21
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Why are departing VFR aircraft given a time check, prior to Class D I always thought this was only an IFR thing?
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 05:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time Checks

Because that's what CASA said had to happen. Nobody ever said it had to make sense.
mirage3 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 07:11
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Prior to Class D it was only IFR but now, as with all Class D aerodromes, where an accurate time source is not available (for example a CATIS) we have to give all departing aircraft a time check.
Awol57 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 21:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In an Airplane
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As already mentioned, show me a US Class D with Instrument Approaches that has only 3NM and 1500FT AGL, and abuts Class G.

Anyone?

Hello CASA? Hello?
There probably isn't one.

If you want an example of how it should work.......

Try KYIP and KDTW in Detroit.

8 Nm apart. KYIP is D and KDTW is B.
privateer01 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.