Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Uncle Sam accelerates the introduction of ADS-B

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Uncle Sam accelerates the introduction of ADS-B

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 06:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Golden Road to Samarkand
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uncle Sam accelerates the introduction of ADS-B

Bill aims to speed up air traffic system overhaul


By JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 1 min ago

WASHINGTON – Transforming the nation's air traffic system by replacing World War II-era radar with 21st century GPS technology would be accelerated under a bill approved Monday by the Senate.
The $34.5 billion bill funds the Federal Aviation Administration through Sept. 30, 2011... It also addresses a series of safety concerns raised by the crash of a regional airliner last year near Buffalo, N.Y., that killed 50 people.
The centerpiece of the bill calls for key elements of the FAA's NextGen program to be in place at the busiest American airports by 2014. The system won't be fully in place for noncommercial aircraft until after 2020.
The nation's antiquated air traffic control system is a major source of airline delays.
The new system is projected to cost the FAA as much as $22 billion through 2025. Airlines would have to spend as much as $20 billion more to install equipment in their planes.
In the long term, the system is expected to save airlines money by allowing planes in crowded air corridors to take more direct routes and fly closer to each other without safety risks, reducing delays, saving energy and cutting down on pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions. Pilots will have real time information on the location of other aircraft.
The system is crucial to handling the expected growth in air traffic from about 700 million passengers in 2009 to the more than 1 billion annually by 2023.
The United States lags behind other nations in making the transition to the new technology, said Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., a key sponsor of the bill. Even Mongolia, he said, is further along.
"It's embarrassing," said Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.
The bill, passed by a 93-0 vote, contains a provision authorizing the FAA to make grants to airlines to help cover equipment costs. Some airline executives have said that as much as they want the new system, they can't afford to put it in their planes.
Airlines have suffered repeated shocks over the past decade, including the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the SARS virus, volatile oil prices and the current economic downturn. They have shed more than 158,000 full-time jobs since employment peaked in 2001 and lost an estimated $30 billion to $60 billion in recent years...
___

Associated Press writer Jim Abrams contributed to this report.
Interesting... even in an economic shock, they're determined to implement ADS-B as soon as possible.
Quokka is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 06:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Interesting... even in an economic shock, they're determined to implement ADS-B as soon as possible
Yes, what a wonderful example of forward thinking sound economic management the yanks have been.....






.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 10:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: skullzone
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The nation's antiquated air traffic control system is a major source of airline delays.
and
In the long term, the system is expected to save airlines money by allowing planes in crowded air corridors to take more direct routes and fly closer to each other without safety risks, reducing delays, saving energy and cutting down on pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions.
are terrific motherhood statements, so full of wonderfully positive-sounding rhetoric, unfortunately they totally ignore the unpleasant fact that reducing (ground and enroute) delays and energy/emissions, is pointless if there is not enough concrete to handle the traffic in the terminal areas, or if the weather is not favourable.

I do like the safety aspect though.






8.7.6.5.4. queue Flying Binghi in 3.2.
KittyKatKaper is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 14:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What the KKK said. More concrete but the NIMBY rule.
max1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.