Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Turbo Engines, wategates & MP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2010, 02:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vic
Age: 56
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Turbo Engines, wategates & MP

A question posed to me today but no only partial explination in the AGK book.

Waste gate fully closed(above critical altitude)
Increase rpm gives you a higher MP - Decrease RPM MP falls

Wastegate operating normally (below critical altitude)

Increase or decrease RPM - MP stays the same as the wastegate opens and closes as required to maintain the selected uperdeck pressure.

Wastegate failed to fully open position
Increase RPM causes MP to fall and decrease RPM causes MP to rise - just like a non turbo engine.

Have i got it right or am i barking up the wrong tree?
Ozgrade3 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 03:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im 90% sure that in theory you're correct but going from my time with manual and auto waste gates on the same ac type RPM has a negligable effect on MP.

The theory being with a closed wastegate as you increase RPM you increase exhaust pressure increasing the turbine speed. Of course in doing so you increase the need for aspiration, so any increase in pressure from increased turbine speed is negated by the extra air required.

If the wastegate is auto any minor difference is controlled by the uperdeck pressure.

If the wastegate is open it is as you said acting as an N/A engine, but again MP changes are still negligable.

Last edited by eocvictim; 7th Jan 2010 at 03:23.
eocvictim is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 08:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Y
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Seneca II has a fixed waste gate. It's been a while but from memory we used to climb at 34" MP and 2450 RPM. At top of climb the throttle was left at the climb position and the RPM reduced to 2200RPM. With the RPM reduction the MP reduced from 34" to 31" which we used for cruise. So reducing RPM makes quite a difference to MP with a fixed waste gate.
leg man is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2010, 09:11
  #4 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also worth having a read of Pelican's Perch #15:<br>Manifold Pressure Sucks! to gain a good understanding behind manifold pressure.

Plus at Pelican's Perch - More Stories there is a 6 part series on turbos and engine management, along with other great learning stuff on engines.
 
Old 7th Jan 2010, 11:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
tmpf...........keep studying that stuff.....will do you a lot of good one day young fella!
Jabawocky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.